Bilateral outpatient total knee arthroplasty – Is it feasible, safe, and worth considering: A pilot study

S. Rajan, Saurabh Jain, Chetan Dhosariya, A. Goyal
{"title":"Bilateral outpatient total knee arthroplasty – Is it feasible, safe, and worth considering: A pilot study","authors":"S. Rajan, Saurabh Jain, Chetan Dhosariya, A. Goyal","doi":"10.4103/jotr.jotr_21_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected patients has proved to be beneficial to both patients and health-care systems in terms of safety, reoperations, readmission rate, complications, cost-effectiveness, increased patient satisfaction, and improved outcome scores. However, these benefits of outpatient TKA have been limited to unilateral TKA. Hence, we reviewed the results of bilateral outpatient TKA in five patients to educate surgeons about the feasibility, safety, benefit, and area of research for bilateral outpatient TKA and its worth consideration in selected groups of patients to decrease patient morbidity and cost. Materials and Methods: Five bilateral knee arthroplasties done as outpatient surgeries at our center were reviewed for patient satisfaction, readmission, reoperation, emergency visit without readmission, unplanned clinic visits, and complications. All these cases followed proper selection criteria, adequate preoperative planning, and strict adherence to our standard operating protocols. Results: Five patients of bilateral outpatient TKA with a mean age of 48.6 years were included in the study. All patients have excellent outcomes at 1-month follow-up. The mean Knee Society Score was 91. None of the patients required reoperation or revision surgery. All the patients demonstrated a high level of satisfaction, without any complications of instability, infection, ileus, urinary tract infection, or deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Bilateral outpatient TKA can be considered a suitable alternative with benefits of reduced hospital stay, and hence decreased morbidity and cost, early mobilization and recovery, economical advantages, minimal pain owing to multimodal analgesia, faster return to normalcy, and less mental stress or disturbances, but in selected patients at specialized center only. The study stresses on the fact of bilateral outpatient TKA should also considered a key area of research in the field of outpatient TKA in addition to other areas of universal selection criteria, ideal risk assessment tool, safety aspect, surgical duration, ambulation, and reasons for not able to discharge.","PeriodicalId":34195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation","volume":"24 1","pages":"68 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jotr.jotr_21_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected patients has proved to be beneficial to both patients and health-care systems in terms of safety, reoperations, readmission rate, complications, cost-effectiveness, increased patient satisfaction, and improved outcome scores. However, these benefits of outpatient TKA have been limited to unilateral TKA. Hence, we reviewed the results of bilateral outpatient TKA in five patients to educate surgeons about the feasibility, safety, benefit, and area of research for bilateral outpatient TKA and its worth consideration in selected groups of patients to decrease patient morbidity and cost. Materials and Methods: Five bilateral knee arthroplasties done as outpatient surgeries at our center were reviewed for patient satisfaction, readmission, reoperation, emergency visit without readmission, unplanned clinic visits, and complications. All these cases followed proper selection criteria, adequate preoperative planning, and strict adherence to our standard operating protocols. Results: Five patients of bilateral outpatient TKA with a mean age of 48.6 years were included in the study. All patients have excellent outcomes at 1-month follow-up. The mean Knee Society Score was 91. None of the patients required reoperation or revision surgery. All the patients demonstrated a high level of satisfaction, without any complications of instability, infection, ileus, urinary tract infection, or deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Bilateral outpatient TKA can be considered a suitable alternative with benefits of reduced hospital stay, and hence decreased morbidity and cost, early mobilization and recovery, economical advantages, minimal pain owing to multimodal analgesia, faster return to normalcy, and less mental stress or disturbances, but in selected patients at specialized center only. The study stresses on the fact of bilateral outpatient TKA should also considered a key area of research in the field of outpatient TKA in addition to other areas of universal selection criteria, ideal risk assessment tool, safety aspect, surgical duration, ambulation, and reasons for not able to discharge.
双侧门诊全膝关节置换术——是否可行、安全、值得考虑:一项初步研究
门诊全膝关节置换术(TKA)已被证明在安全性、再手术、再入院率、并发症、成本效益、提高患者满意度和改善结果评分方面对患者和卫生保健系统都有益。然而,门诊TKA的这些益处仅限于单侧TKA。因此,我们回顾了5例患者双侧门诊TKA的结果,以教育外科医生双侧门诊TKA的可行性、安全性、益处和研究领域,以及在选定的患者群体中值得考虑的问题,以降低患者的发病率和成本。材料与方法:对5例双侧膝关节置换术患者满意度、再入院、再手术、无再入院的急诊就诊、计划外门诊就诊及并发症进行回顾性分析。所有的病例都遵循正确的选择标准,充分的术前计划,并严格遵守我们的标准手术方案。结果:纳入5例双侧门诊TKA患者,平均年龄48.6岁。随访1个月,所有患者预后良好。膝关节协会平均评分为91分。没有患者需要再手术或翻修手术。所有患者均表现出高水平的满意度,无任何不稳定、感染、肠梗阻、尿路感染或深静脉血栓形成的并发症。结论:双侧门诊TKA可被认为是一种合适的替代方案,具有缩短住院时间、降低发病率和成本、早期活动和恢复、经济优势、多模式镇痛带来的疼痛最小、更快恢复正常、较少精神压力或干扰等优点,但仅适用于专科中心的特定患者。本研究强调,双侧门诊TKA是门诊TKA领域除通用的选择标准、理想的风险评估工具、安全性、手术时间、下床时间、不能出院的原因等方面外,还应考虑的一个重点研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信