A randomized prospective multicentre trial of cefpirome versus piperacillin-tazobactam in febrile neutropenia.

F Bauduer, T Cousin, O Boulat, F Rigal-Huguet, L Molina, N Fegueux, E Jourdan, J M Boiron, J Reiffers
{"title":"A randomized prospective multicentre trial of cefpirome versus piperacillin-tazobactam in febrile neutropenia.","authors":"F Bauduer, T Cousin, O Boulat, F Rigal-Huguet, L Molina, N Fegueux, E Jourdan, J M Boiron, J Reiffers","doi":"10.3109/10428190109064594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fever is frequently the only clinical sign of infection in patients with chemo-induced neutropenia. In this setting, empirical administration of broad spectrum antibiotics must be rapid. The aim of this work was to compare, for the first time, cefpirome (CPO) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) in a large randomized trial. Two hundred-eight febrile neutropenic episodes (FNE) (> or = 38.5 degrees C and ANC < or = 0.5 giga/l) were treated by randomization, as first line therapy, using either CPO 2 g x 2/day (105 cases) or PT 4 g x 3/day (103 cases), alone (CPO: 15/PT: 15), or plus aminoglycoside (165 cases, CPO: 82/PT: 83) or quinolone (CPO: 2/PT: 2). There were 131 men and 77 women aged between 17 and 83 years (median: 49) who received chemotherapy (n = 160) or allogeneic (n = 10) or autologous (n = 38) stem cell transplantations. Underlying diseases were: acute leukemia (n = 131), lymphoma (n = 33), myeloma (n = 16), solid tumor (n = 8), myeloproliferative disorder (n = 9), chronic lymphoid leukemia (n = 5), aplastic anemia (n = 3), myelodysplasia (n = 3). Distribution of age, neutropenia duration (median: 17 days), underlying disease, and protocol therapy duration (median: 11 days) was comparable in both arms. A microbiologically documented infection (MDI) was evidenced in 57 cases (27%). Bacteria were isolated from blood cultures in 54 cases (Gram positive: 32 cases). Their in vitro susceptibility rates to CPO and PT were not different. Two days after antibiotics initiation, clinical (fever disappearance) and microbiological (culture negativation) success rates (SR) were 62% for CPO versus 61% for PT and 50% versus 55% respectively in case of MDI (p = 0.89). Two deaths and 77 failures were registered. At the end of protocol, SR (no antibiotic change/absence of superinfection) was 59% with CPO versus 50% with PT (p = 0.27) and 53% versus 40% respectively in the 151 cases with neutropenia > or = 10 days (p = 0.17). The occurrence of side effects was similar in both arms. In our hands, the efficacy of CPO and PT was comparable for treating FNE.</p>","PeriodicalId":75683,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology international reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"379-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10428190109064594","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell biology international reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10428190109064594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Fever is frequently the only clinical sign of infection in patients with chemo-induced neutropenia. In this setting, empirical administration of broad spectrum antibiotics must be rapid. The aim of this work was to compare, for the first time, cefpirome (CPO) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) in a large randomized trial. Two hundred-eight febrile neutropenic episodes (FNE) (> or = 38.5 degrees C and ANC < or = 0.5 giga/l) were treated by randomization, as first line therapy, using either CPO 2 g x 2/day (105 cases) or PT 4 g x 3/day (103 cases), alone (CPO: 15/PT: 15), or plus aminoglycoside (165 cases, CPO: 82/PT: 83) or quinolone (CPO: 2/PT: 2). There were 131 men and 77 women aged between 17 and 83 years (median: 49) who received chemotherapy (n = 160) or allogeneic (n = 10) or autologous (n = 38) stem cell transplantations. Underlying diseases were: acute leukemia (n = 131), lymphoma (n = 33), myeloma (n = 16), solid tumor (n = 8), myeloproliferative disorder (n = 9), chronic lymphoid leukemia (n = 5), aplastic anemia (n = 3), myelodysplasia (n = 3). Distribution of age, neutropenia duration (median: 17 days), underlying disease, and protocol therapy duration (median: 11 days) was comparable in both arms. A microbiologically documented infection (MDI) was evidenced in 57 cases (27%). Bacteria were isolated from blood cultures in 54 cases (Gram positive: 32 cases). Their in vitro susceptibility rates to CPO and PT were not different. Two days after antibiotics initiation, clinical (fever disappearance) and microbiological (culture negativation) success rates (SR) were 62% for CPO versus 61% for PT and 50% versus 55% respectively in case of MDI (p = 0.89). Two deaths and 77 failures were registered. At the end of protocol, SR (no antibiotic change/absence of superinfection) was 59% with CPO versus 50% with PT (p = 0.27) and 53% versus 40% respectively in the 151 cases with neutropenia > or = 10 days (p = 0.17). The occurrence of side effects was similar in both arms. In our hands, the efficacy of CPO and PT was comparable for treating FNE.

发热性中性粒细胞减少症中头孢匹罗与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的随机前瞻性多中心试验。
发热往往是化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症患者感染的唯一临床表现。在这种情况下,必须迅速使用广谱抗生素。这项研究的目的是在一项大型随机试验中首次比较头孢匹罗(CPO)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(PT)。288 例发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FNE)(>或=38.5 摄氏度,ANC <或=0.5 千兆/升)患者接受了随机治疗,作为一线疗法,单独使用 CPO 2 克 x 2/天(105 例)或 PT 4 克 x 3/天(103 例)(CPO:15/PT:15),或加用氨基糖苷类药物(165 例,CPO:82/PT:83)或喹诺酮类药物(CPO:2/PT:2)。接受化疗(160例)或异体(10例)或自体(38例)干细胞移植的患者中有131名男性和77名女性,年龄在17至83岁之间(中位数:49岁)。基础疾病包括:急性白血病(131例)、淋巴瘤(33例)、骨髓瘤(16例)、实体瘤(8例)、骨髓增生性疾病(9例)、慢性淋巴性白血病(5例)、再生障碍性贫血(3例)、骨髓增生异常(3例)。两组患者的年龄、中性粒细胞减少持续时间(中位数:17 天)、基础疾病和方案治疗持续时间(中位数:11 天)分布相当。57例(27%)患者出现微生物感染(MDI)。54 例患者从血液培养中分离出细菌(革兰氏阳性:32 例)。他们对 CPO 和 PT 的体外敏感率没有差异。开始使用抗生素两天后,CPO 的临床成功率(退烧)和微生物学成功率(培养阴性)(SR)分别为 62% 和 61%,MDI 为 50%和 55%(P = 0.89)。登记的死亡人数为 2 人,失败人数为 77 人。方案结束时,在中性粒细胞减少大于或等于 10 天的 151 个病例中,CPO 的 SR(未更换抗生素/无超级感染)为 59%,而 PT 为 50%(p = 0.27);CPO 的 SR(未更换抗生素/无超级感染)为 53%,而 PT 为 40%(p = 0.17)。两组的副作用发生率相似。在我们手中,CPO 和 PT 治疗 FNE 的疗效相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信