A trial of empowerment-based education in type 2 diabetes—Global rather than glycaemic benefits

Insulin Pub Date : 2009-01-01 Epub Date: 2009-02-23 DOI:10.1016/S1557-0843(09)80006-7
Helen Cooper , Katie Booth , Geoff Gill
{"title":"A trial of empowerment-based education in type 2 diabetes—Global rather than glycaemic benefits","authors":"Helen Cooper ,&nbsp;Katie Booth ,&nbsp;Geoff Gill","doi":"10.1016/S1557-0843(09)80006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We have assessed the effect of a structured, empowerment-based educational system (“LAY or “Look After Yourself”) for patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted, testing the system against standard support. Using 3 centres, 89 patients participated in the study. Outcome measures included glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>), body mass index (BMI) and a variety of quantitative psychological and educational measures. Assessment was made at 6 months (“short-term”) and 12 months (“long-term”) post-intervention. The educational programme was associated with benefits in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels (<em>p</em> = 0.005), illness attitudes (<em>p</em> = 0.04), and perceived treatment effectiveness (<em>p</em> = 0.03) at 6 months follow-up compared to controls. At 12 months however, only illness attitudes (<em>p</em> = 0.01), and self-monitoring (<em>p</em> = 0.002) showed benefit. A combined outcome measure showed positive benefit for the educational programme both at 6 months (<em>p</em> = 0.001) and 12 months (<em>p</em> = 0.002). This structured educational programme, aimed at encouraging selfhelp, was associated with only limited benefits in glycaemic control, but there were significant educational and psychological benefits. Diabetes education should be regarded as having broad patient-based positive outcomes, and should not be expected to have lasting benefits on glycaemic control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100678,"journal":{"name":"Insulin","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 61-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(09)80006-7","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insulin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084309800067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We have assessed the effect of a structured, empowerment-based educational system (“LAY or “Look After Yourself”) for patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted, testing the system against standard support. Using 3 centres, 89 patients participated in the study. Outcome measures included glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI) and a variety of quantitative psychological and educational measures. Assessment was made at 6 months (“short-term”) and 12 months (“long-term”) post-intervention. The educational programme was associated with benefits in HbA1c levels (p = 0.005), illness attitudes (p = 0.04), and perceived treatment effectiveness (p = 0.03) at 6 months follow-up compared to controls. At 12 months however, only illness attitudes (p = 0.01), and self-monitoring (p = 0.002) showed benefit. A combined outcome measure showed positive benefit for the educational programme both at 6 months (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.002). This structured educational programme, aimed at encouraging selfhelp, was associated with only limited benefits in glycaemic control, but there were significant educational and psychological benefits. Diabetes education should be regarded as having broad patient-based positive outcomes, and should not be expected to have lasting benefits on glycaemic control.

一项针对2型糖尿病的赋权教育试验-全球而非血糖益处
我们已经评估了一个结构化的、以赋权为基础的教育系统(LAY或“照顾好自己”)对2型糖尿病患者的影响。进行了随机对照试验(RCT),对该系统进行标准支持测试。在3个中心,89名患者参与了这项研究。结果测量包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、身体质量指数(BMI)和各种定量心理和教育测量。在干预后6个月(“短期”)和12个月(“长期”)进行评估。与对照组相比,在6个月的随访中,教育计划与HbA1c水平(p = 0.005)、疾病态度(p = 0.04)和感知治疗效果(p = 0.03)相关。然而,在12个月时,只有疾病态度(p = 0.01)和自我监测(p = 0.002)显示出益处。综合结果测量显示,在6个月(p = 0.001)和12个月(p = 0.002)时,教育计划都有积极的益处。这种旨在鼓励自助的结构化教育计划在血糖控制方面只有有限的益处,但在教育和心理上却有显著的益处。糖尿病教育应被视为具有广泛的基于患者的积极结果,而不应期望对血糖控制有持久的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书