An investigation of the optimization of search logic for the MEDLINE database

M. H. Heine, J. Tague-Sutcliffe
{"title":"An investigation of the optimization of search logic for the MEDLINE database","authors":"M. H. Heine, J. Tague-Sutcliffe","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4%3C267::AID-ASI3%3E3.0.CO;2-Y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key variables in the optimization of the retrieval process is the logic imposed on a set of query terms. If the query is small, a combinatorial algorithm can be employed to identify search expressions having an optimal logical form. An experiment is described in which this was done for queries expressed against MEDLINE, for a variety of criterion variables. The method employed is useful not only for assisting in identifying optimal logical forms, as demonstrated, but also as an experimental control device to assist investigations into the effects of varying the set, and number, of search terms. The experiment also suggests several novel properties of effective searching against MEDLINE, for example that searching with four MeSH terms is likely to be more successful than searching with a lesser number of terms, provided search logic is optimal. The latter result is, surprisingly, true for both Precision and Recall, i.e., a tradeoff between the maximally attainable values of these variables fails to hold when the number of search terms varies in this range.","PeriodicalId":79676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","volume":"64 1","pages":"267-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4%3C267::AID-ASI3%3E3.0.CO;2-Y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

One of the key variables in the optimization of the retrieval process is the logic imposed on a set of query terms. If the query is small, a combinatorial algorithm can be employed to identify search expressions having an optimal logical form. An experiment is described in which this was done for queries expressed against MEDLINE, for a variety of criterion variables. The method employed is useful not only for assisting in identifying optimal logical forms, as demonstrated, but also as an experimental control device to assist investigations into the effects of varying the set, and number, of search terms. The experiment also suggests several novel properties of effective searching against MEDLINE, for example that searching with four MeSH terms is likely to be more successful than searching with a lesser number of terms, provided search logic is optimal. The latter result is, surprisingly, true for both Precision and Recall, i.e., a tradeoff between the maximally attainable values of these variables fails to hold when the number of search terms varies in this range.
MEDLINE数据库搜索逻辑优化的研究
检索过程优化的关键变量之一是对一组查询项施加的逻辑。如果查询很小,则可以使用组合算法来识别具有最佳逻辑形式的搜索表达式。本文描述了一个实验,在该实验中,针对各种标准变量,对针对MEDLINE表示的查询进行了此操作。所采用的方法不仅有助于识别最佳的逻辑形式,如所示,而且作为一种实验控制装置,有助于调查改变搜索项的集合和数量的影响。实验还提出了针对MEDLINE进行有效搜索的几个新特性,例如,如果搜索逻辑是最优的,使用四个MeSH术语进行搜索可能比使用较少数量的术语进行搜索更成功。令人惊讶的是,后一种结果对于Precision和Recall都是正确的,也就是说,当搜索词的数量在这个范围内变化时,这些变量的最大可获得值之间的权衡不起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信