DURABILITY PERFORMANCES OF COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCKS EXPOSED TO WETTING–DRYING CYCLES AND HIGH TEMPERATURE

Philbert Nshimiyimana, C. Hema, Seick Omar Sore, Ousmane Zoungrana, A. Messan, L. Courard
{"title":"DURABILITY PERFORMANCES OF COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCKS EXPOSED TO WETTING–DRYING CYCLES AND HIGH TEMPERATURE","authors":"Philbert Nshimiyimana, C. Hema, Seick Omar Sore, Ousmane Zoungrana, A. Messan, L. Courard","doi":"10.2495/arc220121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environmental durability of earthen materials is among the main factors that limit their widespread acceptance in the contemporary building sector. This study assesses the performances of compressed earth blocks (CEBs) before and after exposure to the wetting–drying (WD) cycles and high temperature. The CEBs were produced from kaolinite-rich earth material stabilized with lime-rich residue (5%–25%) or the lime substituted with rice husk ash, lime:ash (20:0%–12:8%) or cement (4%–8%), with respect to the mass of dry earth. The CEBs were cured for 28–45 days and at the ambient temperature of a laboratory of 30±5°C and the moisture of production, necessary for the reactivity of the binders and improvement of the performances of CEBs. The CEBs were dried before testing their initial compressive strength. Their compressive strength was also tested after exposure to 12 cycles of wetting in water for 6 hours at 30±5°C and drying in the oven for 42 hours at 70±5°C. Additionally, it was tested after exposure to the elevated temperature of 150–600°C. After exposure to the WD cycles, the compressive strength of CEBs relatively increased, by up to 49% (4.6 to 6.8 MPa) for CEBs stabilized with lime (15%) and by up to 40% (4.4 to 6.2 MPa) with lime:ash (20:0%), with respect to their strength before the WD cycles. The maximum increase of the strength was observed for CEBs containing a higher amount of lime, related to the reaction of excess lime which resulted in the formation of more cementitious products and improvement of the strength of CEBs. Nevertheless, the compressive strength decreased by 55% (12.5 to 5.5 MPa) for the CEBs stabilized with cement (4%), resulting from the degradation of the initial cementitious products. However, the strength increased by up to 58% (4.2 to 6.6 MPa) for the CEBs stabilized with cement (8%) after exposure to 600°C. This implies that the stabilization of CEBs with lime-rich binder is more resilient to the WD cycles than cement. It also shows that the cement stabilized CEBs would at least retain their strength after exposure to high temperature.","PeriodicalId":23773,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/arc220121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental durability of earthen materials is among the main factors that limit their widespread acceptance in the contemporary building sector. This study assesses the performances of compressed earth blocks (CEBs) before and after exposure to the wetting–drying (WD) cycles and high temperature. The CEBs were produced from kaolinite-rich earth material stabilized with lime-rich residue (5%–25%) or the lime substituted with rice husk ash, lime:ash (20:0%–12:8%) or cement (4%–8%), with respect to the mass of dry earth. The CEBs were cured for 28–45 days and at the ambient temperature of a laboratory of 30±5°C and the moisture of production, necessary for the reactivity of the binders and improvement of the performances of CEBs. The CEBs were dried before testing their initial compressive strength. Their compressive strength was also tested after exposure to 12 cycles of wetting in water for 6 hours at 30±5°C and drying in the oven for 42 hours at 70±5°C. Additionally, it was tested after exposure to the elevated temperature of 150–600°C. After exposure to the WD cycles, the compressive strength of CEBs relatively increased, by up to 49% (4.6 to 6.8 MPa) for CEBs stabilized with lime (15%) and by up to 40% (4.4 to 6.2 MPa) with lime:ash (20:0%), with respect to their strength before the WD cycles. The maximum increase of the strength was observed for CEBs containing a higher amount of lime, related to the reaction of excess lime which resulted in the formation of more cementitious products and improvement of the strength of CEBs. Nevertheless, the compressive strength decreased by 55% (12.5 to 5.5 MPa) for the CEBs stabilized with cement (4%), resulting from the degradation of the initial cementitious products. However, the strength increased by up to 58% (4.2 to 6.6 MPa) for the CEBs stabilized with cement (8%) after exposure to 600°C. This implies that the stabilization of CEBs with lime-rich binder is more resilient to the WD cycles than cement. It also shows that the cement stabilized CEBs would at least retain their strength after exposure to high temperature.
干湿循环和高温下压缩土块的耐久性能
土材料的环境耐久性是限制其在当代建筑领域广泛接受的主要因素之一。本文研究了压缩土块(ceb)在干湿循环和高温作用前后的性能。根据干土的质量,用富石灰渣(5% ~ 25%)稳定富高岭石土材料或用稻壳灰、石灰:灰(20:0% ~ 12:8%)或水泥(4% ~ 8%)代替石灰制备ceb。ceb在30±5°C的实验室环境温度和生产湿度下固化28-45天,这是粘合剂反应性和ceb性能改善所必需的。在测试其初始抗压强度之前,将ceb干燥。在30±5°C的水中湿化6小时,在70±5°C的烘箱中干燥42小时,经过12个循环后,测试了它们的抗压强度。另外,在150-600°C的高温下进行测试。经过WD循环后,ceb的抗压强度相对于WD循环前的强度提高了49% (4.6 - 6.8 MPa),石灰(15%)稳定的ceb的抗压强度提高了49% (4.4 - 6.2 MPa),石灰:灰分(20:0%)稳定的ceb的抗压强度提高了40% (4.4 - 6.2 MPa)。石灰掺入量越高,ceb的强度提高幅度越大,这与过量石灰的反应导致ceb的胶凝产物越多,强度提高有关。然而,由于初始胶凝产物的降解,水泥稳定的ceb(4%)的抗压强度下降了55% (12.5 ~ 5.5 MPa)。然而,暴露于600°C后,水泥稳定的ceb(8%)强度增加了58%(4.2至6.6 MPa)。这表明,与水泥相比,富石灰胶结剂的ceb对WD循环的稳定性更强。结果表明,水泥稳定的ceb在高温下至少能保持其强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信