Are wild wolves southpaws? Including potential conservation implications

S. Barber-Meyer
{"title":"Are wild wolves southpaws? Including potential conservation implications","authors":"S. Barber-Meyer","doi":"10.26451/abc.09.01.06.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lateralization, or a left-right bias in behavior (e.g., handedness), was originally thought to exclusively exist in humans, but is now known to be widespread. Lateralization can exist at the individual or group level. In dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), tests of paw preference have produced inconsistent results. Because wolves (C. l.) differ genetically, morphologically, and behaviorally from dogs, I was interested in assessing them for lateralization. I examined lateralization (right versus left) of the foot captured (a step test analog) of wild wolves (n = 93) trapped for radiocollaring purposes in the Superior National Forest, Minnesota from 2011 – 2017 and 2019. No support was found for lateralization, and sex and age class were not significant predictors of which foot was captured. Because many mammals demonstrate lateralization, and because population-level lateralization is thought to convey increased social cohesion, it is surprising that wild wolves did not demonstrate population level lateralization. This step test analog may not have been an appropriate measure (as lateralization is task dependent) and / or wolf lateralization may exist at the individual level, but not the population level. Future work on wolf lateralization at both the individual and population levels examining pawedness via multiple tasks while accounting for potential confounding factors (such as different rearing conditions and methods) could provide clarification. Examining potential trade-offs between the costs and benefits of lateralization that these highly social animals may incur would be very interesting in terms of evolution and in comparison with dogs. Furthermore, because lateralization has been connected to emotional functioning and animal welfare, baseline lateralization data from wild wolves may inform captive wolf management and conservation, including the captive breeding programs for endangered Mexican wolves (C. l. baileyi) and red wolves (C. rufus) and other programs (e.g., educational facilities).","PeriodicalId":31700,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.09.01.06.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lateralization, or a left-right bias in behavior (e.g., handedness), was originally thought to exclusively exist in humans, but is now known to be widespread. Lateralization can exist at the individual or group level. In dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), tests of paw preference have produced inconsistent results. Because wolves (C. l.) differ genetically, morphologically, and behaviorally from dogs, I was interested in assessing them for lateralization. I examined lateralization (right versus left) of the foot captured (a step test analog) of wild wolves (n = 93) trapped for radiocollaring purposes in the Superior National Forest, Minnesota from 2011 – 2017 and 2019. No support was found for lateralization, and sex and age class were not significant predictors of which foot was captured. Because many mammals demonstrate lateralization, and because population-level lateralization is thought to convey increased social cohesion, it is surprising that wild wolves did not demonstrate population level lateralization. This step test analog may not have been an appropriate measure (as lateralization is task dependent) and / or wolf lateralization may exist at the individual level, but not the population level. Future work on wolf lateralization at both the individual and population levels examining pawedness via multiple tasks while accounting for potential confounding factors (such as different rearing conditions and methods) could provide clarification. Examining potential trade-offs between the costs and benefits of lateralization that these highly social animals may incur would be very interesting in terms of evolution and in comparison with dogs. Furthermore, because lateralization has been connected to emotional functioning and animal welfare, baseline lateralization data from wild wolves may inform captive wolf management and conservation, including the captive breeding programs for endangered Mexican wolves (C. l. baileyi) and red wolves (C. rufus) and other programs (e.g., educational facilities).
野狼是左撇子吗?包括潜在的保育影响
偏侧化,或行为上的左右偏向(例如,惯用手),最初被认为只存在于人类中,但现在被认为是普遍存在的。偏侧化可以存在于个人或群体层面。在狗(Canis lupus familiaris)中,对爪子偏好的测试产生了不一致的结果。由于狼在遗传、形态和行为上与狗不同,我对评估它们的侧化很感兴趣。我检查了2011年至2017年和2019年在明尼苏达州苏必利尔国家森林(Superior National Forest)捕获的野狼(n = 93)的脚的侧化(右与左)(一个步骤测试模拟)。没有发现侧化的支持,性别和年龄等级不是捕获足部的显著预测因子。因为许多哺乳动物表现出侧化,而且种群水平的侧化被认为传达了增强的社会凝聚力,所以野生狼没有表现出种群水平的侧化是令人惊讶的。这个步骤测试模拟可能不是一个适当的测量(因为侧化是任务依赖的)和/或狼侧化可能存在于个体水平,但不存在于群体水平。未来在个体和种群水平上对狼侧化的研究将通过多种任务来检查爪爪,同时考虑潜在的混杂因素(如不同的饲养条件和方法),从而提供澄清。从进化的角度和与狗的比较来看,研究这些高度社会化的动物可能产生的偏侧化的成本和收益之间的潜在权衡将是非常有趣的。此外,由于侧化与情感功能和动物福利有关,野生狼的基线侧化数据可以为圈养狼的管理和保护提供信息,包括濒危墨西哥狼(c.l. baileyi)和红狼(c.r uff)的圈养繁殖计划以及其他计划(例如教育设施)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书