Experimental study of the safety of the selective COX‐2 inhibitor, celecoxib, for gastric mucosa

Jun Ting Li, Z. Li, X. Zhan, Z. Cui, Shinan Nie
{"title":"Experimental study of the safety of the selective COX‐2 inhibitor, celecoxib, for gastric mucosa","authors":"Jun Ting Li, Z. Li, X. Zhan, Z. Cui, Shinan Nie","doi":"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE:  To compare the gastric mucosal damage induced by a COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, and a conventional NSAID, indomethacin. \n \n \n \nMETHODS:  A rat model of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage was prepared for indomethacin and celecoxib separately (n = 8). After gastric damage was induced by 100% ethanol, celecoxib was administered by gastric gavage (n = 8). Gastric mucosal concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 and the lesion index (LI) were measured. Morphological changes of the gastric mucosa were assessed under light and scanning electron microscopy. \n \n \n \nRESULTS:  Indomethacin caused marked gastric damage (LI: 13.38 ± 2.06) and significant reduction of the concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 (P < 0.01), Celecoxib did not produce necrotic injuries on healthy gastric mucosa (LI: 0), but the mucosal injuries previously induced by ethanol worsened after its administration (LI: 37.19 ± 3.34 vs 19.90 ± 2.28, P < 0.01). \n \n \n \nCONCLUSIONS:  Inhibition of COX-1 is the major mechanism of NSAIDs in producing gastric mucosal damage. As a selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib does not produce toxic injuries of the healthy gastric mucosa, and is thus safer than conventional NSAID. However, when administered in the presence of an altered gastric mucosa, gastric injuries were worsened.","PeriodicalId":10082,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","volume":"64 1","pages":"53-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2003.T01-1-00115.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:  To compare the gastric mucosal damage induced by a COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, and a conventional NSAID, indomethacin. METHODS:  A rat model of NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage was prepared for indomethacin and celecoxib separately (n = 8). After gastric damage was induced by 100% ethanol, celecoxib was administered by gastric gavage (n = 8). Gastric mucosal concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 and the lesion index (LI) were measured. Morphological changes of the gastric mucosa were assessed under light and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS:  Indomethacin caused marked gastric damage (LI: 13.38 ± 2.06) and significant reduction of the concentrations of 6-keto-PGF1α and TXB2 (P < 0.01), Celecoxib did not produce necrotic injuries on healthy gastric mucosa (LI: 0), but the mucosal injuries previously induced by ethanol worsened after its administration (LI: 37.19 ± 3.34 vs 19.90 ± 2.28, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:  Inhibition of COX-1 is the major mechanism of NSAIDs in producing gastric mucosal damage. As a selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib does not produce toxic injuries of the healthy gastric mucosa, and is thus safer than conventional NSAID. However, when administered in the presence of an altered gastric mucosa, gastric injuries were worsened.
选择性COX‐2抑制剂塞来昔布对胃粘膜安全性的实验研究
目的:比较COX-2抑制剂塞来昔布和传统非甾体抗炎药吲哚美辛对胃粘膜的损伤。方法:分别用吲哚美辛和塞来昔布制备非甾体抗炎药(nsaid)致胃粘膜损伤大鼠模型(n = 8), 100%乙醇诱导胃损伤后,灌胃塞来昔布(n = 8),测定胃黏膜6-酮- pgf1 α、TXB2浓度及损伤指数(LI)。在光镜和扫描电镜下观察胃黏膜的形态学变化。结果:吲哚美辛对胃损伤显著(LI: 13.38±2.06),6-酮- pgf1 α和TXB2浓度显著降低(P < 0.01),塞来昔布对健康胃粘膜无坏死损伤(LI: 0),但给药后乙醇诱导的粘膜损伤加重(LI: 37.19±3.34 vs 19.90±2.28,P < 0.01)。结论:抑制COX-1是非甾体抗炎药引起胃粘膜损伤的主要机制。作为一种选择性COX-2抑制剂,塞来昔布不会对健康胃粘膜产生毒性损伤,因此比传统的非甾体抗炎药更安全。然而,当胃粘膜发生改变时,胃损伤加重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信