The compare of three kinds of inferior oblique surgeries

Heng Sun, Liyun Guo, Hong-gen Du
{"title":"The compare of three kinds of inferior oblique surgeries","authors":"Heng Sun, Liyun Guo, Hong-gen Du","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the influences of three inferior oblique surgeries on horizontal, vertical and rotary eye positions. \n \n \nMethods \nFifty-one cases of inferior oblique (IO) muscles overaction who underwent the weaken surgery alone were collected retrospectively. There were three surgical methods underwent: recessions of IO (Group A, 15 cases), myectomy of IO (Group B, 23 cases) and transposition of IO (Group C, 13 cases). \n \n \nResults \nThe influences on horizontal position in group A, B, C were not different(P >0.05). The influences on vertical position were 7.5△±3.5△, 8.1△±2.9△, 12.8△±3.1△ in group A, B, C, respectively, and there was no significant differenc between group A and B (P >0.05), and there were significant differences between group C and A/group C and B (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nIn efficiency of influence to eye positions, both recession and myectomy are equal. There is few influence to the horizontal eye position in these three surgery methods. Transposition of the IO strikes the greatest influence to the vertical eye position. All three surgery methods have the similar influence to rotary position. \n \n \nKey words: \nInferior oblique overaction; Recession; Myectomy; Transposition","PeriodicalId":10236,"journal":{"name":"中国实用眼科杂志","volume":"69 1","pages":"996-998"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实用眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-4443.2017.10.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the influences of three inferior oblique surgeries on horizontal, vertical and rotary eye positions. Methods Fifty-one cases of inferior oblique (IO) muscles overaction who underwent the weaken surgery alone were collected retrospectively. There were three surgical methods underwent: recessions of IO (Group A, 15 cases), myectomy of IO (Group B, 23 cases) and transposition of IO (Group C, 13 cases). Results The influences on horizontal position in group A, B, C were not different(P >0.05). The influences on vertical position were 7.5△±3.5△, 8.1△±2.9△, 12.8△±3.1△ in group A, B, C, respectively, and there was no significant differenc between group A and B (P >0.05), and there were significant differences between group C and A/group C and B (P 0.05). Conclusions In efficiency of influence to eye positions, both recession and myectomy are equal. There is few influence to the horizontal eye position in these three surgery methods. Transposition of the IO strikes the greatest influence to the vertical eye position. All three surgery methods have the similar influence to rotary position. Key words: Inferior oblique overaction; Recession; Myectomy; Transposition
三种下斜肌手术的比较
目的比较三种下斜眼手术对水平、垂直和旋转眼位的影响。方法回顾性分析51例单独行下斜肌弱化手术的下斜肌过度活动的病例。采用三种手术方式:内眦赘肉切除(A组,15例)、内眦赘肉切除(B组,23例)和内眦赘肉转位(C组,13例)。结果A、B、C组对水平体位的影响无显著性差异(P < 0.05)。A、B、C组对垂直体位的影响分别为7.5△±3.5△、8.1△±2.9△、12.8△±3.1△,A、B组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05), C组与A/ C、B组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论在对眼位的影响方面,切除与切除对眼位的影响是相等的。三种手术方式对水平眼位影响不大。眼内移位对眼的垂直位置影响最大。三种手术方式对旋转位置的影响相似。关键词:下斜肌过动;经济衰退;肌切除术;换位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9101
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信