Economic Evaluation of Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Iran in 2019

Q3 Medicine
Mirtaher Mousavi, Rajabali Daroudi, Marzieh Shirazikhah, Mehdi Alizadeh Zarei, Hamidreza Hendi, Faezeh Joghataei, A. Darvishi
{"title":"Economic Evaluation of Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Iran in 2019","authors":"Mirtaher Mousavi, Rajabali Daroudi, Marzieh Shirazikhah, Mehdi Alizadeh Zarei, Hamidreza Hendi, Faezeh Joghataei, A. Darvishi","doi":"10.32598/rj.23.3.3369.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Despite the evidence that rehabilitation interventions are effective for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, these interventions usually impose costs on the health system. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions for the health system of countries through economic evaluation. In this study, we examined the cost-effectiveness and net financial benefits of rehabilitation services in treating spinal cord injuries in Iran. Materials & Methods Considering that this research is the first economic evaluation study related to spinal cord injury rehabilitation, the first stage of the economic evaluation was dedicated to designing an economic evaluation model. The model was designed based on disease groups, the natural course of the disease, the details of rehabilitation interventions for spinal cord injury patients in different disease groups, clinical outcomes, probability of occurrence of outcomes, and related costs. The structure of the economic evaluation model of this study is based on the design of a lifetime Markov model with a 1-year cycle length for each strategy and two groups of patients (paraplegia and tetraplegia). In this study, we also used the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to determine the cost of the most effective strategy. All findings were analyzed using Excel 2016 and TreeAge 2011 software. Results According to the annual incidence of spinal cord injury patients in need of rehabilitation services in the country, which is about 2000 people, based on public sector tariffs, the total annual cost of SCI rehabilitation in Iran in the paraplegia group ranges from 32997 to 40200 million Iranian Rials (IRR) and in the tetraplegia group from 25476 to 26119 million IRR in mild to very severe conditions. Also, the total rehabilitation costs of SCI patients based on public sector tariffs in one year were calculated to equal 256847 million IRR. Similarly, based on private sector tariffs, the total annual costs of SCI rehabilitation in the paraplegia group were estimated from 86374 to 103122 million IRR and in the tetraplegia group from 67509 to 68997 million IRR in mild to very severe cases. Meanwhile, the total rehabilitation costs of SCI patients were calculated based on private sector tariffs in one year, equivalent to 668847 million IRR. Also, the average lifetime of SCI patients undergoing rehabilitation is lower compared to non-rehabilitation and also has higher QALY (The quality-adjusted life year) values, which indicates the dominance of the rehabilitation strategy. The amount of ICER, in this case, is estimated based on public sector tariffs equal to negative 674 million IRR and based on private sector tariffs equal to negative 629 million IRR per QALY unit. Possible sensitivity analysis of the results and Monte Carlo simulation in both scenarios confirmed the initial analysis findings with high probability. Based on the public sector tariff, the net amount of incremental financial benefits of rehabilitation for the total annual incidence is estimated at 8991 billion IRR. These amounts were calculated based on private sector tariffs of 8579 billion IRR. Conclusion Generally, the results of this economic evaluation showed that the rehabilitation of spinal cord injury patients in Iran, based on public and private sector tariffs, is quite cost-effective and has significant net positive financial benefits. The results of the sensitivity analysis also confirmed this finding.","PeriodicalId":46374,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/rj.23.3.3369.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Despite the evidence that rehabilitation interventions are effective for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, these interventions usually impose costs on the health system. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions for the health system of countries through economic evaluation. In this study, we examined the cost-effectiveness and net financial benefits of rehabilitation services in treating spinal cord injuries in Iran. Materials & Methods Considering that this research is the first economic evaluation study related to spinal cord injury rehabilitation, the first stage of the economic evaluation was dedicated to designing an economic evaluation model. The model was designed based on disease groups, the natural course of the disease, the details of rehabilitation interventions for spinal cord injury patients in different disease groups, clinical outcomes, probability of occurrence of outcomes, and related costs. The structure of the economic evaluation model of this study is based on the design of a lifetime Markov model with a 1-year cycle length for each strategy and two groups of patients (paraplegia and tetraplegia). In this study, we also used the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to determine the cost of the most effective strategy. All findings were analyzed using Excel 2016 and TreeAge 2011 software. Results According to the annual incidence of spinal cord injury patients in need of rehabilitation services in the country, which is about 2000 people, based on public sector tariffs, the total annual cost of SCI rehabilitation in Iran in the paraplegia group ranges from 32997 to 40200 million Iranian Rials (IRR) and in the tetraplegia group from 25476 to 26119 million IRR in mild to very severe conditions. Also, the total rehabilitation costs of SCI patients based on public sector tariffs in one year were calculated to equal 256847 million IRR. Similarly, based on private sector tariffs, the total annual costs of SCI rehabilitation in the paraplegia group were estimated from 86374 to 103122 million IRR and in the tetraplegia group from 67509 to 68997 million IRR in mild to very severe cases. Meanwhile, the total rehabilitation costs of SCI patients were calculated based on private sector tariffs in one year, equivalent to 668847 million IRR. Also, the average lifetime of SCI patients undergoing rehabilitation is lower compared to non-rehabilitation and also has higher QALY (The quality-adjusted life year) values, which indicates the dominance of the rehabilitation strategy. The amount of ICER, in this case, is estimated based on public sector tariffs equal to negative 674 million IRR and based on private sector tariffs equal to negative 629 million IRR per QALY unit. Possible sensitivity analysis of the results and Monte Carlo simulation in both scenarios confirmed the initial analysis findings with high probability. Based on the public sector tariff, the net amount of incremental financial benefits of rehabilitation for the total annual incidence is estimated at 8991 billion IRR. These amounts were calculated based on private sector tariffs of 8579 billion IRR. Conclusion Generally, the results of this economic evaluation showed that the rehabilitation of spinal cord injury patients in Iran, based on public and private sector tariffs, is quite cost-effective and has significant net positive financial benefits. The results of the sensitivity analysis also confirmed this finding.
2019年伊朗脊髓损伤患者康复经济评价
尽管有证据表明康复干预对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者有效,但这些干预措施通常会给卫生系统带来成本。因此,有必要通过经济评价来审查这些干预措施对各国卫生系统的成本效益。在这项研究中,我们研究了伊朗治疗脊髓损伤康复服务的成本效益和净经济效益。考虑到本研究是第一个与脊髓损伤康复相关的经济评价研究,经济评价的第一阶段致力于设计经济评价模型。模型根据疾病分组、疾病的自然病程、不同疾病组脊髓损伤患者康复干预的细节、临床结局、结局发生的概率、相关费用进行设计。本研究的经济评价模型的结构是基于生命周期马尔可夫模型的设计,每个策略的周期长度为1年,两组患者(截瘫和四肢瘫)。在本研究中,我们还使用增量成本-效果比(ICER)来确定最有效策略的成本。使用Excel 2016和TreeAge 2011软件对所有结果进行分析。结果根据伊朗每年约2000名需要康复服务的脊髓损伤患者的发病率,按公共部门收费计算,伊朗截瘫组脊髓损伤康复的年总费用为32997 - 402亿伊朗里亚尔(IRR),四肢瘫痪组轻度至极重度脊髓损伤康复的年总费用为25476 - 261.19亿伊朗里亚尔(IRR)。同时,根据公共部门收费计算,SCI患者一年内的康复总费用为256847亿IRR。同样,根据私营部门的关税,截瘫组脊髓损伤康复的年度总成本估计为86374至103122亿IRR,四肢瘫痪组在轻度至极重度病例中为67509至689.97亿IRR。同时,根据私营部门关税计算SCI患者一年的康复总费用,相当于6688.47亿IRR。同时,接受康复治疗的SCI患者的平均生存期较未接受康复治疗的患者短,且质量调整生命年(QALY)值较高,表明康复治疗策略占主导地位。在这种情况下,ICER的金额是根据等于负6.74亿国内卢比的公共部门关税和等于负6.29亿国内卢比的私营部门关税估算的。两种情况下可能的灵敏度分析结果和蒙特卡罗模拟高概率地证实了初步分析结果。根据公共部门的费率,每年总发病率中康复的增量财政效益净额估计为89910亿印度卢比。这些数额是根据私营部门8579亿印度卢比的关税计算的。总的来说,这项经济评估的结果表明,根据公共和私营部门的关税,伊朗脊髓损伤患者的康复具有相当高的成本效益,并具有显著的净正经济效益。敏感性分析的结果也证实了这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信