{"title":"About non-federal justice Part I. Should the constitutional (statutory) ones have been abolished courts of the subjects of the Russian Federation?","authors":"M. Kleandrov","doi":"10.31857/s102694520025928-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the first of a series of articles, devoted to the problems of domestic non-federal justice, examines a set of issues related to the constitutional (statutory) courts of the Russian Federation. The author, considering the role and importance of this institution of justice in Russia, the presence of a huge scientific and legal component of its foundation and other factors, as well as the insufficiency of the grounds for its abolition, came to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore it. Taking into account the main drawback of the named institution in the public consciousness – its “high cost” and low “productivity”, the author makes specific proposals to offset this shortcoming when recreating – on a new legislative basis – this institution of domestic justice.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520025928-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, the first of a series of articles, devoted to the problems of domestic non-federal justice, examines a set of issues related to the constitutional (statutory) courts of the Russian Federation. The author, considering the role and importance of this institution of justice in Russia, the presence of a huge scientific and legal component of its foundation and other factors, as well as the insufficiency of the grounds for its abolition, came to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore it. Taking into account the main drawback of the named institution in the public consciousness – its “high cost” and low “productivity”, the author makes specific proposals to offset this shortcoming when recreating – on a new legislative basis – this institution of domestic justice.