The Effect of Test Machine Compliance on the Measured Shear Punch Yield Stress as Predicted Using Finite Element Analysis

M. Toloczko, K. Abe, M. L. Hamilton, F. Garner, R. Kurtz
{"title":"The Effect of Test Machine Compliance on the Measured Shear Punch Yield Stress as Predicted Using Finite Element Analysis","authors":"M. Toloczko, K. Abe, M. L. Hamilton, F. Garner, R. Kurtz","doi":"10.1520/STP10831S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In previous research involving the use of the shear punch test, it was assumed that the displacement of the punch tip was only slightly different than the crosshead displacement. The present work explores this assumption and its ramifications by simulating the shear punch test with finite element analysis (FEA). The simulations suggest that punch tip displacement is much less than previously assumed, and that for the test frames which have been used, crosshead displacement is over an order of magnitude greater than punch tip displacement. This difference in displacements is thought to be due to test machine and punch compliance, and a simple elasticity calculation of the compliance of the punch, the test machine, and a specimen gives a result which is in agreement with the FEA simulations. The effect of using punch tip displacement on the observed effective shear yield stress was evaluated using FEA simulated shear punch tests on several different metals. Yield was measured at several different offset shear strains with a 1.0% offset shear yield strength measurement providing the best correlation with 0.2% offset uniaxial yield strength. When using the 1.0% offset shear yield values, the previously observed material-to-material variability in the tensile-shear correlation all butmore » disappeared. Based on this work, it appears that the material-to-material variations in prior correlations between uniaxial yield strength and shear yield strength is due to a combination of large test machine compliance and material-to-material differences in the work hardening exponent.« less","PeriodicalId":18264,"journal":{"name":"Materials Transactions Jim","volume":"34 1","pages":"1356-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Transactions Jim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/STP10831S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In previous research involving the use of the shear punch test, it was assumed that the displacement of the punch tip was only slightly different than the crosshead displacement. The present work explores this assumption and its ramifications by simulating the shear punch test with finite element analysis (FEA). The simulations suggest that punch tip displacement is much less than previously assumed, and that for the test frames which have been used, crosshead displacement is over an order of magnitude greater than punch tip displacement. This difference in displacements is thought to be due to test machine and punch compliance, and a simple elasticity calculation of the compliance of the punch, the test machine, and a specimen gives a result which is in agreement with the FEA simulations. The effect of using punch tip displacement on the observed effective shear yield stress was evaluated using FEA simulated shear punch tests on several different metals. Yield was measured at several different offset shear strains with a 1.0% offset shear yield strength measurement providing the best correlation with 0.2% offset uniaxial yield strength. When using the 1.0% offset shear yield values, the previously observed material-to-material variability in the tensile-shear correlation all butmore » disappeared. Based on this work, it appears that the material-to-material variations in prior correlations between uniaxial yield strength and shear yield strength is due to a combination of large test machine compliance and material-to-material differences in the work hardening exponent.« less
试验机顺应性对用有限元分析预测的剪切冲床屈服应力的影响
在先前的研究中,使用剪切冲头试验,假设冲头尖端的位移仅与十字头位移略有不同。本工作探讨了这一假设及其后果,模拟剪切冲击试验与有限元分析(FEA)。模拟表明,冲头位移远小于先前的假设,并且对于已使用的测试框架,十字头位移大于冲头位移一个数量级以上。这种位移的差异被认为是由于试验机和冲床的顺应性,并且对冲床、试验机和试样的顺应性进行简单的弹性计算,得出的结果与有限元模拟一致。通过对几种不同金属进行有限元模拟剪切冲压试验,评价了冲压头位移对观察到的有效剪切屈服应力的影响。在几种不同的偏置剪切应变下测量了屈服,其中1.0%的偏置剪切屈服强度测量与0.2%的偏置单轴屈服强度的相关性最好。当使用1.0%偏移剪切屈服值时,之前观察到的材料与材料之间的拉伸-剪切相关性变化几乎完全消失。基于这项工作,单轴屈服强度和剪切屈服强度之间的先验相关性在材料与材料之间的变化似乎是由于大型试验机的顺应性和加工硬化指数中材料与材料之间的差异的结合。«少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信