Providing Validity Evidence to Improve the Assessment of English Language Learners. CRESST Report 738.

M. Wolf, J. Herman, Jinok S. Kim, J. Abedi, Seth Leon, Noelle C. Griffin, Patina L. Bachman, Sandy Chang, Tim Farnsworth, Hyekyung Jung, J. Nollner, H. Shin
{"title":"Providing Validity Evidence to Improve the Assessment of English Language Learners. CRESST Report 738.","authors":"M. Wolf, J. Herman, Jinok S. Kim, J. Abedi, Seth Leon, Noelle C. Griffin, Patina L. Bachman, Sandy Chang, Tim Farnsworth, Hyekyung Jung, J. Nollner, H. Shin","doi":"10.1037/e643102011-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research project addresses the validity of assessments used to measure the performance of English language learners (ELLs), such as those mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB, 2002). The goals of the research are to help educators understand and improve ELL performance by investigating the validity of their current assessments, and to provide states with much needed guidance to improve the validity of their English language proficiency (ELP) and academic achievement assessments for ELL students. The research has three phases. In the first phase, the researchers analyze existing data and documents to understand the nature and validity of states’ current practices and their priority needs. This first phase is exploratory in that the researchers identify key validity issues by examining the existing data and formulate research areas where further investigation is needed for the second phase. In the second phase of the research, the researchers will deepen their analysis of the areas identified from Phase I findings. In the third phase of the research, the researchers will develop specific guidelines on which states may base their ELL assessment policy and practice. The present report focuses on the researchers’ Phase I research activities and results. The report also discusses preliminary implications and recommendations for improving ELL assessment systems. 1 We would like to thank Lyle Bachman, Alison Bailey, Frances Butler, Diane August, and Guillermo SolanoFlores for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this report. We are also very grateful to our three participating states for their willingness to share their data and support of our work.","PeriodicalId":19116,"journal":{"name":"National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e643102011-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

This research project addresses the validity of assessments used to measure the performance of English language learners (ELLs), such as those mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB, 2002). The goals of the research are to help educators understand and improve ELL performance by investigating the validity of their current assessments, and to provide states with much needed guidance to improve the validity of their English language proficiency (ELP) and academic achievement assessments for ELL students. The research has three phases. In the first phase, the researchers analyze existing data and documents to understand the nature and validity of states’ current practices and their priority needs. This first phase is exploratory in that the researchers identify key validity issues by examining the existing data and formulate research areas where further investigation is needed for the second phase. In the second phase of the research, the researchers will deepen their analysis of the areas identified from Phase I findings. In the third phase of the research, the researchers will develop specific guidelines on which states may base their ELL assessment policy and practice. The present report focuses on the researchers’ Phase I research activities and results. The report also discusses preliminary implications and recommendations for improving ELL assessment systems. 1 We would like to thank Lyle Bachman, Alison Bailey, Frances Butler, Diane August, and Guillermo SolanoFlores for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this report. We are also very grateful to our three participating states for their willingness to share their data and support of our work.
为提高英语学习者的评价提供效度证据。738号报告。
本研究项目探讨了用于衡量英语学习者(ELLs)表现的评估的有效性,例如2001年《不让一个孩子掉队法》(NCLB, 2002)规定的评估。本研究的目的是通过调查当前评估的有效性来帮助教育工作者了解和提高外语学习成绩,并为各州提供急需的指导,以提高他们对外语学生的英语语言能力(ELP)和学业成绩评估的有效性。这项研究分为三个阶段。在第一阶段,研究人员分析现有数据和文件,以了解各州当前做法的性质和有效性以及它们的优先需求。第一阶段是探索性的,研究人员通过检查现有数据确定关键的有效性问题,并制定第二阶段需要进一步调查的研究领域。在第二阶段的研究中,研究人员将对第一阶段发现的领域进行深入分析。在研究的第三阶段,研究人员将制定具体的指导方针,各州可以以此为基础制定ELL评估政策和实践。本报告的重点是研究人员的第一阶段的研究活动和结果。报告还讨论了改善ELL评估系统的初步影响和建议。1 .我们要感谢莱尔·巴赫曼、艾莉森·贝利、弗朗西斯·巴特勒、黛安·奥古斯特和吉列尔莫·索拉纳·洛夫雷斯对本报告早期草稿提出的宝贵意见。我们也非常感谢三个参与国愿意分享数据并支持我们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信