How Do We Know If Teachers Are Well? The Wellbeing Holistic Assessment for Teachers Tool

Fernanda Soares, Nina Menezes Cunha, Paul Frisoli
{"title":"How Do We Know If Teachers Are Well? The Wellbeing Holistic Assessment for Teachers Tool","authors":"Fernanda Soares, Nina Menezes Cunha, Paul Frisoli","doi":"10.33682/f059-7nxk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on the development, adaptation, and validation of the Wellbeing Holistic Assessment for Teachers (WHAT) tool with a sample of 1,659 Salvadoran teachers. El Salvador is a conflict-affected country marked by high levels of gang-related violence, which interacts with education and directly affects the wellbeing of teachers. Having a contextually grounded and validated tool is imperative to further our understanding of educator wellbeing in El Salvador and other conflict-affected settings, as it enables us to generate evidence that informs policies and interventions. In this article, we describe how we reviewed and selected the measures that comprise the WHAT tool, followed by an initial conceptualization of teacher wellbeing and a description of the experiences and challenges teachers in El Salvador are facing. We describe our process for translating and adapting the selected measures to the Salvadoran context, which included conducting cognitive interviews. The results from our exploratory factor analysis provide construct validity evidence for the internal structure of the individual measures used. The exploratory factor analysis that included all the items for all the measures confirmed that each scale is indeed measuring a different construct. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a good model fit. The process of adapting the tool and the results of our psychometric analysis provide evidence of the tool's validity, based on the content of the items in the tool, the internal structure, and its relationship to other variables.","PeriodicalId":93794,"journal":{"name":"Journal on education in emergencies","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on education in emergencies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33682/f059-7nxk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article reports on the development, adaptation, and validation of the Wellbeing Holistic Assessment for Teachers (WHAT) tool with a sample of 1,659 Salvadoran teachers. El Salvador is a conflict-affected country marked by high levels of gang-related violence, which interacts with education and directly affects the wellbeing of teachers. Having a contextually grounded and validated tool is imperative to further our understanding of educator wellbeing in El Salvador and other conflict-affected settings, as it enables us to generate evidence that informs policies and interventions. In this article, we describe how we reviewed and selected the measures that comprise the WHAT tool, followed by an initial conceptualization of teacher wellbeing and a description of the experiences and challenges teachers in El Salvador are facing. We describe our process for translating and adapting the selected measures to the Salvadoran context, which included conducting cognitive interviews. The results from our exploratory factor analysis provide construct validity evidence for the internal structure of the individual measures used. The exploratory factor analysis that included all the items for all the measures confirmed that each scale is indeed measuring a different construct. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a good model fit. The process of adapting the tool and the results of our psychometric analysis provide evidence of the tool's validity, based on the content of the items in the tool, the internal structure, and its relationship to other variables.
我们如何知道老师是否健康?教师福祉整体评估工具
本文以1659名萨尔瓦多教师为样本,报告了教师福祉整体评估(WHAT)工具的开发、适应和验证。萨尔瓦多是一个受冲突影响的国家,与帮派有关的暴力事件发生率很高,这与教育相互作用,直接影响到教师的福祉。拥有一个基于背景并经过验证的工具对于进一步了解萨尔瓦多和其他受冲突影响的环境中的教育工作者的福祉至关重要,因为它使我们能够生成为政策和干预提供信息的证据。在本文中,我们描述了我们如何审查和选择构成WHAT工具的措施,随后是教师福利的初步概念化,并描述了萨尔瓦多教师面临的经验和挑战。我们描述了翻译和调整选定措施以适应萨尔瓦多环境的过程,其中包括进行认知访谈。我们的探索性因子分析的结果为所使用的个别措施的内部结构提供了结构效度证据。探索性因子分析包括所有测量的所有项目,证实每个量表确实是测量不同的结构。验证性因子分析的结果证实了良好的模型拟合。根据工具中项目的内容、内部结构及其与其他变量的关系,调整工具的过程和我们的心理测量分析结果为工具的有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信