PROLONGED POST – OPERATIVE HOSPITALIZATION PREDICTS HIGH BURDEN OF UMBLICAL PORT SITE INFECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.

Abdul Hadi, M. Aqeel, Muhammad Shahbaz
{"title":"PROLONGED POST – OPERATIVE HOSPITALIZATION PREDICTS HIGH BURDEN OF UMBLICAL PORT SITE INFECTION IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY.","authors":"Abdul Hadi, M. Aqeel, Muhammad Shahbaz","doi":"10.7176/jmpb/54-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the commonly performed surgical procedure these days which is associated with significant reduction of morbidities and mortality. This study was conducted to ascertain port site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using gloves. Objective; To determine frequency of port site infection (PSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy when gallbladder is removed without using gloves. Material and Methods; A total of 254 patients undergoing laparoscpic cholecystectomy were enrolled in our study. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed and after removal of gall bladder without endogloves the laparoscope was moved to the epigastric port, and a large-tooth grasping forceps were inserted through the umbilical port to grasp the gallbladder at the area of the cystic duct and were followed for wound infection. Results; Of these 254 study cases, 98 (36.6 %) were male patients while 156 (61.4 %) were female patients. Mean age of our study cases was 49.58 ± 6.32 years. Of these 254 study cases, 89 (35.0 %) belonged to rural areas and 165 (65.0 %) belonged to urban areas. Diabetes was present in 68 (26.8 %) of our study cases. Hypertension was present in 126 (49.6 %) of our study cases.  Mean duration of surgery was 55.28 ± 15.23 minutes and 185 (72.8 %) had duration of procedure up to 1 hour. Mean hospital stay was 5.22 ± 2.18 days and 204 (80.3%) had hospital stay up to 6 days. Umblical port site infection (PSI) was noted in 20 (7.9%). Conclusion; High frequency of umblical port site infection was noted in our study among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using gloves, so use of gloves is safe, cost effective and reduces related morbidities. Port site infection was significantly associated with increasing, gender, diabetes, residential status, prolonged duration of surgery and duration of hospitalization. Keywords; Umblical Port site infection, gloves, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy DOI : 10.7176/JMPB/54-13 Publication date : April 30 th 2019","PeriodicalId":16339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/54-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the commonly performed surgical procedure these days which is associated with significant reduction of morbidities and mortality. This study was conducted to ascertain port site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using gloves. Objective; To determine frequency of port site infection (PSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy when gallbladder is removed without using gloves. Material and Methods; A total of 254 patients undergoing laparoscpic cholecystectomy were enrolled in our study. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed and after removal of gall bladder without endogloves the laparoscope was moved to the epigastric port, and a large-tooth grasping forceps were inserted through the umbilical port to grasp the gallbladder at the area of the cystic duct and were followed for wound infection. Results; Of these 254 study cases, 98 (36.6 %) were male patients while 156 (61.4 %) were female patients. Mean age of our study cases was 49.58 ± 6.32 years. Of these 254 study cases, 89 (35.0 %) belonged to rural areas and 165 (65.0 %) belonged to urban areas. Diabetes was present in 68 (26.8 %) of our study cases. Hypertension was present in 126 (49.6 %) of our study cases.  Mean duration of surgery was 55.28 ± 15.23 minutes and 185 (72.8 %) had duration of procedure up to 1 hour. Mean hospital stay was 5.22 ± 2.18 days and 204 (80.3%) had hospital stay up to 6 days. Umblical port site infection (PSI) was noted in 20 (7.9%). Conclusion; High frequency of umblical port site infection was noted in our study among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using gloves, so use of gloves is safe, cost effective and reduces related morbidities. Port site infection was significantly associated with increasing, gender, diabetes, residential status, prolonged duration of surgery and duration of hospitalization. Keywords; Umblical Port site infection, gloves, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy DOI : 10.7176/JMPB/54-13 Publication date : April 30 th 2019
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后住院时间延长预示着脐孔部位感染的高负担。
背景;腹腔镜胆囊切除术是当今常用的外科手术之一,它与发病率和死亡率的显著降低有关。本研究在不戴手套的情况下进行了腹腔镜胆囊切除术后端口感染的研究。客观的;目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在不戴手套摘除胆囊时发生port site感染(PSI)的频率。材料与方法;我们的研究共纳入254例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者。行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,切除胆囊后不带内手套,将腹腔镜移至胃壁口,经脐口插入大齿抓钳,在胆囊管处抓取胆囊,随访伤口感染情况。结果;254例患者中,男性98例(36.6%),女性156例(61.4%)。我们研究病例的平均年龄为49.58±6.32岁。254例病例中,农村89例(35.0%),城镇165例(65.0%)。我们的研究病例中有68例(26.8%)患有糖尿病。126例(49.6%)患者存在高血压。平均手术时间55.28±15.23分钟,185例(72.8%)手术时间超过1小时。平均住院时间为5.22±2.18 d,住院时间超过6 d的204例(80.3%)。20例(7.9%)出现脐部感染(PSI)。结论;在我们的研究中发现,腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在不戴手套的情况下,脐孔部位感染的发生率很高,因此使用手套是安全、经济、有效的,可以降低相关的发病率。口岸感染与增加、性别、糖尿病、居住状况、手术时间延长和住院时间显著相关。关键字;脐端口感染,手套,腹腔镜胆囊切除术DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/54-13出版日期:2019年4月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信