The influence of resilience and expressive flexibility on character strengths and virtues on military leadership in U.S. Military cadets

Vasiliki Georgoulas-Sherry
{"title":"The influence of resilience and expressive flexibility on character strengths and virtues on military leadership in U.S. Military cadets","authors":"Vasiliki Georgoulas-Sherry","doi":"10.18297/jwellness/vol3/iss2/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Character strengths and virtues are greatly revered in military leadership. However, there is no empirical work assessing the relationship of resilience and expressive flexibility, two essential psychological constructs crucial in nurturing mentally healthy individuals, also for successful officer development and military leadership. Methods: Employing a cross-sectional design, this study recruited 107 participants (ages 18 to 22) from a private U.S. Military university. McGrath, Rashid, Park, and Peterson’s and Peterson and Seligman’s taxonomies of character strengths and virtues were measured. Self-reported resilience and expressive flexibility were additionally assessed. Results: Results revealed McGrath et al.’s virtue of self-control and Peterson and Seligman’s virtues of temperance, wisdom and knowledge, and humanity as the top ranked virtues for an effective military leader. In terms of character strengths, judgment ranked the highest, with perspective and fairness, second and third. Additional results showed a model suggesting that resilience and expressive flexibility explained 45.9% of variance suggesting that resilience and expressive flexibility significantly (p < .001) predicted leadership. Regression models that included honesty, social intelligence, and hope also offered significant predictive outcomes on leadership (p < .001). Furthermore, results revealed that expressive flexibility predicted the character strengths of creativity (p = .001), bravery (p = .045), love (p = .044), hope (p = .016), teamwork (p = .013), appreciation of beauty (p = .016), curiosity (p = .044), prudence (p = .034), love of learning (p = .020), zest (p = .017), humor (p = .018), and perspective (p = .003). Conclusions: Understanding the relationships amongst these constructs will help in better cultivating protective mechanisms that safeguard from adversity, in encouraging wellness and health, and in supporting healthy human performance and development.","PeriodicalId":90738,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18297/jwellness/vol3/iss2/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Character strengths and virtues are greatly revered in military leadership. However, there is no empirical work assessing the relationship of resilience and expressive flexibility, two essential psychological constructs crucial in nurturing mentally healthy individuals, also for successful officer development and military leadership. Methods: Employing a cross-sectional design, this study recruited 107 participants (ages 18 to 22) from a private U.S. Military university. McGrath, Rashid, Park, and Peterson’s and Peterson and Seligman’s taxonomies of character strengths and virtues were measured. Self-reported resilience and expressive flexibility were additionally assessed. Results: Results revealed McGrath et al.’s virtue of self-control and Peterson and Seligman’s virtues of temperance, wisdom and knowledge, and humanity as the top ranked virtues for an effective military leader. In terms of character strengths, judgment ranked the highest, with perspective and fairness, second and third. Additional results showed a model suggesting that resilience and expressive flexibility explained 45.9% of variance suggesting that resilience and expressive flexibility significantly (p < .001) predicted leadership. Regression models that included honesty, social intelligence, and hope also offered significant predictive outcomes on leadership (p < .001). Furthermore, results revealed that expressive flexibility predicted the character strengths of creativity (p = .001), bravery (p = .045), love (p = .044), hope (p = .016), teamwork (p = .013), appreciation of beauty (p = .016), curiosity (p = .044), prudence (p = .034), love of learning (p = .020), zest (p = .017), humor (p = .018), and perspective (p = .003). Conclusions: Understanding the relationships amongst these constructs will help in better cultivating protective mechanisms that safeguard from adversity, in encouraging wellness and health, and in supporting healthy human performance and development.
美国军校学员的韧性和表达灵活性对性格优势和军事领导美德的影响
导言:在军事领导中,性格优势和美德受到极大的尊重。然而,没有实证研究评估弹性和表达灵活性的关系,这两个基本的心理结构对于培养心理健康的个体至关重要,对于成功的军官发展和军事领导也至关重要。方法:采用横断面设计,本研究从美国一所私立军事大学招募了107名参与者(18至22岁)。麦格拉思,拉希德,帕克,彼得森彼得森和塞利格曼的性格优势和美德分类进行了测量。自我报告的弹性和表达灵活性也被评估。结果:结果显示,McGrath等人的自我控制美德和Peterson和Seligman的节制、智慧和知识以及人性美德是有效军事领导者的首要美德。在性格优势方面,判断力排名最高,观点和公平分列第二和第三。结果显示,弹性和表达灵活性解释了45.9%的方差,表明弹性和表达灵活性对领导力有显著的预测作用(p < 0.001)。包括诚实、社会智力和希望在内的回归模型也对领导力提供了显著的预测结果(p < 0.001)。此外,结果显示,表达灵活性预测了创造力(p = .001)、勇敢(p = .045)、爱心(p = .044)、希望(p = .016)、团队合作(p = .013)、欣赏美(p = .016)、好奇心(p = .044)、谨慎(p = .034)、热爱学习(p = .020)、热情(p = .017)、幽默(p = .018)和观点(p = .003)的性格优势。结论:了解这些构式之间的关系将有助于更好地培养保护机制,以保护人们免受逆境,促进健康和健康,并支持健康的人类表现和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书