THE Economic Assesment On Bottom Ash Utilizing As The Bio Coal Fuel

D. Marganingrum, C. Irawan, A. T. Mursito, L. M. Estiaty, L. N. Listiyowati, D. N. Arifin, Hidawati
{"title":"THE Economic Assesment On Bottom Ash Utilizing As The Bio Coal Fuel","authors":"D. Marganingrum, C. Irawan, A. T. Mursito, L. M. Estiaty, L. N. Listiyowati, D. N. Arifin, Hidawati","doi":"10.14203/jep.29.1.2021.27-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coal bottom ash was included in Hazardous and Toxic Waste (LB3), which requires seriously manage not to warm the environment and humans health. LB3 management becomes an obligation for the industry which producing it and being a burden in itself due to the project of waste utilization often regarded as the high-cost investment projects or less profitable. This study aims to conduct an economic assessment of pilot-scale projects to reuse bottom ash to support the clean industry strategy. The study mixed coal bottom ash with biomass from municipalities solid waste (MSW), called bio-coal fuel. These raw materials were combined with a composition 60%:40% weight (bottom ash: biomass) to be briquette form by adding amylum as a binder. This study used the benefit-cost analysis approach to assess economic feasibility. Tree indicators used in this study were net benefit-cost ratio, payback period, and return on investment. These indicators provided the company policy to continue or stop this project. The finding study showed that the company got a payback period and the net benefit from the ninth year. The company also achieved a net B/C ratio was more than one, and ROI was 1.09 times in the ninth year. The other beneficiaries acquired by the company was included external costs, such as risks from commitment failure by third parties in coal waste management, costs rising risk of purchasing coal, and given a positive value for providing employment.","PeriodicalId":32634,"journal":{"name":"JEPI Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEPI Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/jep.29.1.2021.27-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal bottom ash was included in Hazardous and Toxic Waste (LB3), which requires seriously manage not to warm the environment and humans health. LB3 management becomes an obligation for the industry which producing it and being a burden in itself due to the project of waste utilization often regarded as the high-cost investment projects or less profitable. This study aims to conduct an economic assessment of pilot-scale projects to reuse bottom ash to support the clean industry strategy. The study mixed coal bottom ash with biomass from municipalities solid waste (MSW), called bio-coal fuel. These raw materials were combined with a composition 60%:40% weight (bottom ash: biomass) to be briquette form by adding amylum as a binder. This study used the benefit-cost analysis approach to assess economic feasibility. Tree indicators used in this study were net benefit-cost ratio, payback period, and return on investment. These indicators provided the company policy to continue or stop this project. The finding study showed that the company got a payback period and the net benefit from the ninth year. The company also achieved a net B/C ratio was more than one, and ROI was 1.09 times in the ninth year. The other beneficiaries acquired by the company was included external costs, such as risks from commitment failure by third parties in coal waste management, costs rising risk of purchasing coal, and given a positive value for providing employment.
底灰作为生物煤燃料的经济性评价
煤底灰分被列入危险和有毒废物(LB3),要求严格管理,不使环境和人类健康变暖。由于垃圾利用项目往往被视为高成本投资项目或低收益项目,垃圾b3管理成为生产企业的义务,本身也成为负担。本研究旨在对中试规模的底灰再利用项目进行经济评估,以支持清洁工业战略。该研究将煤底灰与来自城市固体废物(MSW)的生物质混合,称为生物煤燃料。通过添加淀粉作为粘合剂,将这些原料与重量为60%:40%(底灰:生物质)的组合物组合成型煤形式。本研究采用效益-成本分析方法评估经济可行性。本研究使用的3个指标为净收益成本比、投资回收期和投资回报率。这些指标提供了公司继续或停止该项目的政策。研究结果表明,公司从第九年开始有一个投资回收期和净收益。该公司还实现了净B/C比率超过1,第九年的投资回报率为1.09倍。公司获得的其他收益计入外部成本,如煤矸石管理中第三方承诺失败的风险、购买煤炭的成本上升风险等,并给予提供就业的正价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信