Estimation of linear quadratic (LQ) model parameter alpha/beta (α/β) and biologically effective dose (BED) for acute normal tissue reactions in head and neck malignancies

Mirza Athar Ali, S. Jakhar, D. Punia, M. Bardia, Ajay Sharma, H. Kumar, Sandeep Jain, N. Sharma, Vinod Agrawal, K. Harsh, A. Kalwar, M. Babaiah, Prabhakar Mariappan, N. Madhusudhan, Sujana Priya Vuba
{"title":"Estimation of linear quadratic (LQ) model parameter alpha/beta (α/β) and biologically effective dose (BED) for acute normal tissue reactions in head and neck malignancies","authors":"Mirza Athar Ali, S. Jakhar, D. Punia, M. Bardia, Ajay Sharma, H. Kumar, Sandeep Jain, N. Sharma, Vinod Agrawal, K. Harsh, A. Kalwar, M. Babaiah, Prabhakar Mariappan, N. Madhusudhan, Sujana Priya Vuba","doi":"10.14319/IJCTO.44.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model has been widely used for describing radiobiological effectiveness of various fractionation schedules on tumour as well as normal tissues. This study estimates α/β for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Methods: 50 cases of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (stage III and IV) treated with external beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Patients were randomly distributed into Hyper-fractionation (HF) arm (1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 6 hours apart) and conventional fractionation (CF) arm (2 Gy/fraction, once daily) with 25 cases in each arm. α/β and BED were calculated for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Results: In our study, the estimated values of α/β for RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 11.2 Gy, 10.1 Gy and 9 Gy respectively. Estimated values of α/β for RTOG grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 9.7 Gy, 8.0 Gy and 9.1 Gy respectively. For Hyper-fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.45 Gy 11.239 , 66.90 Gy 10.114 and 73.43Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.5 Gy 9.797 , 57.8 Gy 8.011 and 70.8 Gy 9.106 respectively. For conventional fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.09 Gy 11.239 , 66.88 Gy 10.114 and 73.33 Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.52 Gy 9.797 , 57.68 Gy 8.011 and 70.73 Gy 9.106 respectively. Conclusion: LQ model and the concept of BED provide an excellent tool to compare different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. The estimated values of α/β for acute reacting normal tissues are in good agreement with the available literature.","PeriodicalId":13931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14319/IJCTO.44.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model has been widely used for describing radiobiological effectiveness of various fractionation schedules on tumour as well as normal tissues. This study estimates α/β for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Methods: 50 cases of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (stage III and IV) treated with external beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Patients were randomly distributed into Hyper-fractionation (HF) arm (1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 6 hours apart) and conventional fractionation (CF) arm (2 Gy/fraction, once daily) with 25 cases in each arm. α/β and BED were calculated for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Results: In our study, the estimated values of α/β for RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 11.2 Gy, 10.1 Gy and 9 Gy respectively. Estimated values of α/β for RTOG grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 9.7 Gy, 8.0 Gy and 9.1 Gy respectively. For Hyper-fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.45 Gy 11.239 , 66.90 Gy 10.114 and 73.43Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.5 Gy 9.797 , 57.8 Gy 8.011 and 70.8 Gy 9.106 respectively. For conventional fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.09 Gy 11.239 , 66.88 Gy 10.114 and 73.33 Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.52 Gy 9.797 , 57.68 Gy 8.011 and 70.73 Gy 9.106 respectively. Conclusion: LQ model and the concept of BED provide an excellent tool to compare different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. The estimated values of α/β for acute reacting normal tissues are in good agreement with the available literature.
头颈部恶性肿瘤急性正常组织反应的线性二次(LQ)模型参数α/β (α/β)和生物有效剂量(BED)的估计
目的:线性二次(LQ)模型已被广泛用于描述不同分离方案对肿瘤和正常组织的放射生物学效果。本研究使用Fe-plot法估计急性正常组织反应的α/β。方法:对50例局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(III期和IV期)行外束放射治疗的患者进行研究。患者随机分为超分割(HF)组(1.2 Gy/次,每日2次,间隔6小时)和常规分割(CF)组(2 Gy/次,每日1次),每组25例。用Fe-plot法计算急性正常组织反应的α/β和BED。结果:在我们的研究中,RTOG(放射治疗肿瘤组)1级、2级和3级皮肤反应的α/β估计值分别为11.2 Gy、10.1 Gy和9 Gy。RTOG 1级、2级和3级粘膜反应的α/β估计值分别为9.7 Gy、8.0 Gy和9.1 Gy。对于超分馏组,1级、2级和3级皮肤反应的计算BED值分别为54.45 Gy 11.239、66.90 Gy 10.114和73.43Gy 9.001, 1级、2级和3级粘膜反应的计算BED值分别为33.5 Gy 9.797、57.8 Gy 8.011和70.8 Gy 9.106。对于常规分馏组,1、2、3级皮肤反应的计算BED值分别为54.09 Gy 11.239、66.88 Gy 10.114和73.33 Gy 9.001, 1、2、3级粘膜反应的计算BED值分别为33.52 Gy 9.797、57.68 Gy 8.011和70.73 Gy 9.106。结论:LQ模型和BED概念为比较放疗中不同分割方案提供了一个很好的工具。急性反应正常组织的α/β估计值与现有文献一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书