Estimation of linear quadratic (LQ) model parameter alpha/beta (α/β) and biologically effective dose (BED) for acute normal tissue reactions in head and neck malignancies
Mirza Athar Ali, S. Jakhar, D. Punia, M. Bardia, Ajay Sharma, H. Kumar, Sandeep Jain, N. Sharma, Vinod Agrawal, K. Harsh, A. Kalwar, M. Babaiah, Prabhakar Mariappan, N. Madhusudhan, Sujana Priya Vuba
{"title":"Estimation of linear quadratic (LQ) model parameter alpha/beta (α/β) and biologically effective dose (BED) for acute normal tissue reactions in head and neck malignancies","authors":"Mirza Athar Ali, S. Jakhar, D. Punia, M. Bardia, Ajay Sharma, H. Kumar, Sandeep Jain, N. Sharma, Vinod Agrawal, K. Harsh, A. Kalwar, M. Babaiah, Prabhakar Mariappan, N. Madhusudhan, Sujana Priya Vuba","doi":"10.14319/IJCTO.44.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model has been widely used for describing radiobiological effectiveness of various fractionation schedules on tumour as well as normal tissues. This study estimates α/β for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Methods: 50 cases of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (stage III and IV) treated with external beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Patients were randomly distributed into Hyper-fractionation (HF) arm (1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 6 hours apart) and conventional fractionation (CF) arm (2 Gy/fraction, once daily) with 25 cases in each arm. α/β and BED were calculated for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Results: In our study, the estimated values of α/β for RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 11.2 Gy, 10.1 Gy and 9 Gy respectively. Estimated values of α/β for RTOG grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 9.7 Gy, 8.0 Gy and 9.1 Gy respectively. For Hyper-fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.45 Gy 11.239 , 66.90 Gy 10.114 and 73.43Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.5 Gy 9.797 , 57.8 Gy 8.011 and 70.8 Gy 9.106 respectively. For conventional fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.09 Gy 11.239 , 66.88 Gy 10.114 and 73.33 Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.52 Gy 9.797 , 57.68 Gy 8.011 and 70.73 Gy 9.106 respectively. Conclusion: LQ model and the concept of BED provide an excellent tool to compare different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. The estimated values of α/β for acute reacting normal tissues are in good agreement with the available literature.","PeriodicalId":13931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14319/IJCTO.44.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model has been widely used for describing radiobiological effectiveness of various fractionation schedules on tumour as well as normal tissues. This study estimates α/β for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Methods: 50 cases of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (stage III and IV) treated with external beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Patients were randomly distributed into Hyper-fractionation (HF) arm (1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 6 hours apart) and conventional fractionation (CF) arm (2 Gy/fraction, once daily) with 25 cases in each arm. α/β and BED were calculated for acute normal tissue reactions using Fe-plot method. Results: In our study, the estimated values of α/β for RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 11.2 Gy, 10.1 Gy and 9 Gy respectively. Estimated values of α/β for RTOG grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 9.7 Gy, 8.0 Gy and 9.1 Gy respectively. For Hyper-fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.45 Gy 11.239 , 66.90 Gy 10.114 and 73.43Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.5 Gy 9.797 , 57.8 Gy 8.011 and 70.8 Gy 9.106 respectively. For conventional fractionation arm, calculated BED values for grade 1, 2 and 3 skin reactions were 54.09 Gy 11.239 , 66.88 Gy 10.114 and 73.33 Gy 9.001 respectively and for grade 1, 2 and 3 mucosal reactions were 33.52 Gy 9.797 , 57.68 Gy 8.011 and 70.73 Gy 9.106 respectively. Conclusion: LQ model and the concept of BED provide an excellent tool to compare different fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. The estimated values of α/β for acute reacting normal tissues are in good agreement with the available literature.