Substrate roughness affects stream benthic algal diversity, assemblage composition, and nestedness

Fabiana Schneck, A. Schwarzbold, A. S. Melo
{"title":"Substrate roughness affects stream benthic algal diversity, assemblage composition, and nestedness","authors":"Fabiana Schneck, A. Schwarzbold, A. S. Melo","doi":"10.1899/11-044.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract.  Heterogeneity generated by irregularities on the surface of streambed substrates is an important determinant of local species diversity of algae. However, few investigators have examined the effects of substrate roughness on the composition of algal growth forms and on patterns of species distribution. We examined the influence of substrate roughness on stream benthic algal assemblages through a field experiment with 2 treatments (smooth and rough artificial substrates for algal colonization). We assessed whether species richness, density, and assemblage composition of benthic algae (all taxa and those in 5 growth-form groups) differed between treatments and whether differences in species composition between substrates were the result of species turnover or nestedness. We also used a data subsampling procedure to investigate the effect of differences in species richness between treatments. Total species richness was higher on rough than on smooth substrates, but density did not differ between treatments. Species richness, density, and composition of the adnate/prostrate growth form did not differ between treatments. The erect/stalked growth form had higher species richness on rough substrates, but did not differ in density between treatments. All other growth forms (filamentous, motile, and metaphyton) had higher species richness and density on rough substrates and differed in species composition between substrates. The results of the subsampling analysis indicated that assemblage composition was affected by differences in species richness and by changes in species composition (i.e., turnover). Species distribution had a nested pattern, in which the assemblages on smooth substrates were a subgroup of the species occurring on rough substrates. We suggest that the differences in assemblage composition between smooth and rough substrates resulted from variability in species' capabilities to colonize substrates with or without crevices. This variability resulted in both nestedness and turnover.","PeriodicalId":49987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","volume":"58 1","pages":"1049 - 1056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1899/11-044.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Abstract.  Heterogeneity generated by irregularities on the surface of streambed substrates is an important determinant of local species diversity of algae. However, few investigators have examined the effects of substrate roughness on the composition of algal growth forms and on patterns of species distribution. We examined the influence of substrate roughness on stream benthic algal assemblages through a field experiment with 2 treatments (smooth and rough artificial substrates for algal colonization). We assessed whether species richness, density, and assemblage composition of benthic algae (all taxa and those in 5 growth-form groups) differed between treatments and whether differences in species composition between substrates were the result of species turnover or nestedness. We also used a data subsampling procedure to investigate the effect of differences in species richness between treatments. Total species richness was higher on rough than on smooth substrates, but density did not differ between treatments. Species richness, density, and composition of the adnate/prostrate growth form did not differ between treatments. The erect/stalked growth form had higher species richness on rough substrates, but did not differ in density between treatments. All other growth forms (filamentous, motile, and metaphyton) had higher species richness and density on rough substrates and differed in species composition between substrates. The results of the subsampling analysis indicated that assemblage composition was affected by differences in species richness and by changes in species composition (i.e., turnover). Species distribution had a nested pattern, in which the assemblages on smooth substrates were a subgroup of the species occurring on rough substrates. We suggest that the differences in assemblage composition between smooth and rough substrates resulted from variability in species' capabilities to colonize substrates with or without crevices. This variability resulted in both nestedness and turnover.
基质粗糙度影响溪流底栖藻类的多样性、组合组成和筑巢性
摘要河床底物表面的不规则性所产生的异质性是当地藻类物种多样性的重要决定因素。然而,很少有研究者研究了基质粗糙度对藻类生长形式组成和物种分布模式的影响。我们通过两种处理(光滑和粗糙的人工基质用于藻类定植)的现场实验,研究了基质粗糙度对溪流底栖藻类组合的影响。我们评估了底栖藻类(所有分类群和5个生长形态组)的物种丰富度、密度和组合组成在不同处理之间是否存在差异,以及不同基质之间物种组成的差异是否是物种更替或筑巢的结果。我们还使用数据亚采样程序来研究不同处理之间物种丰富度差异的影响。总体物种丰富度在粗糙基质上高于光滑基质,但密度在不同处理间无显著差异。不同处理间的物种丰富度、密度和匍匐生长形式的组成没有差异。直立/茎干生长方式在粗糙基质上具有较高的物种丰富度,但不同处理间的密度差异不大。所有其他生长形式(丝状、活动和变生)在粗糙基质上具有更高的物种丰富度和密度,并且在不同基质上的物种组成存在差异。亚样分析结果表明,群落组成受物种丰富度差异和物种组成变化(即更替)的影响。物种分布呈巢状分布,光滑基质上的物种是粗糙基质上物种的一个亚群。我们认为,光滑和粗糙基质之间组合组成的差异是由于物种在有或没有裂缝的基质上定殖能力的变化。这种可变性导致了嵌套性和周转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Journal of the North American Benthological Society 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信