CT radiation dose optimization and reduction for routine head, chest and abdominal CT examination

Lama Sakhnini
{"title":"CT radiation dose optimization and reduction for routine head, chest and abdominal CT examination","authors":"Lama Sakhnini","doi":"10.15761/RDI.1000120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find an optimization approach to minimize the absorbed dose to adult patients undergoing CT examination, while maintain the diagnostic image quality. A single detector CT was considered, to represent typical practice in King Hamad University Hospital. We included 626 patients in this study and investigated radiation dose for three anatomical regions, head, chest and abdomen and pelvis. For each type of CT examination, two groups of patients were considered. 383 patients in Group I: were imaged according to the protocols set by the manufacturer. Group II: 243 patients were imaged according to the protocols set by our team after optimization. We were able to adjust the adjustable factors such as noise index, scan time, pitch, rotation time and slice thickness. For each examination the weighted volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded and noise is measured. Each study was also reviewed for image quality. Measured (CTDIvol, DLP) were compared to international reference levels. For Group I, the CTDIvol and DLP values were higher than the reference levels. After Dose optimization the CTDIvol and DLP values were significantly reduced to have lower values than the reference levels. The results of our study showed that the CTDIvol and DLP values taken from images done using the protocols set by the Ct machine developers are higher than the reference levels which indicate that manufacturers are focusing their efforts toward improving image quality rather than the minimizing the dose that can be given to the patient. Correspondence to: Lama Sakhnini, Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Bahrain, Sakhir, Kingdom of Bahrain; E-mail: l_ sakhnini@yahoo.com Received: November 1, 2017; Accepted: December 12, 2017; Published: December 15, 2017 Introduction The use of helical, multislice CT (MSCT) is rapidly growing due to technological improvements in the modern machines. Advances in CT imaging techniques have resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of CT examinations in both adult and children, replacing more and more radiographic examinations. However, CT can be responsible for the increase of carcinogenesis [1-4]. But we have to accept the fact that with the vast improvement of technology, patients benefited from a quicker and more accurate diagnosis and precise anatomic information for planning therapeutic procedures. This lead to a substantial increase in the collective dose, as reported by international organizations (ICRP 2000 and United Nations Scientific Committee 2000) [5]. In spite of this constructive contributions of CT to modern healthcare, attention must also be given to the health risk associated with the ionizing radiation received during a CT exam. Because of this potential radiation risk from this increased use of CT makes it important that CT doses be kept as low as reasonably achievable. However, modern CT scanners have a wide variety of exposure factors and involve techniques that allow dose optimization to the patient [6-9]. Guidelines to optimize the protection of patients during CT procedures have been provided by various international organizations [10-13]. All implemented guidelines include reference doses that are defined as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) or guidance levels. These guidelines assist in the optimization and reduction of patient protection and allow comparisons between the different CT scanners and techniques. The dose parameters suggested in the guidelines are the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) for the entire examination. Although there is still adequate room for improvement, CT dose reduction requires a combination of different approaches or strategies. These include optimization of scanning protocols according to ageor weight-based adjustments, justification of CT use by referring physicians and emergency departments, decrease of unnecessary examinations, development of better exposure protocols by manufacturers, and better training and education for radiological technologists. However, to our knowledge, no reports are available in Bahrain with regard to the investigation of CT scanning protocols. There are no standardized procedures for CT imaging across hospitals in Bahrain, as each hospital has its own specific protocol, which are not necessarily optimized in terms of dose reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the adult CT practice, analyze CT scanning parameters used in routine head, chest and abdomen and pelvis imaging in the radiology department at King Hamad University Hospital. Moreover, our practical goal was to find an optimization approach to minimize the absorbed dose to adult patients undergoing CT examination, while maintain the diagnostic image quality. We hope that the results of this study could be used by radiologists and medical imaging technologists to modify their existing practice and serve as one of the basis for optimization of CT imaging. Additionally, the medical community in Bahrain needs to better educate the public to the risks and benefits associated with CT, such that they can make conscience decisions based on scientific facts regarding their healthcare. Materials and methods Patient examinations In this study, medical images taken by Optima CT660 system (GE Health Care, WI, USA) are considered. Adult head, chest, and Sakhnini L (2017) CT radiation dose optimization and reduction for routine head, chest and abdominal CT examination Volume 2(1): 2-4 Radiol Diagn Imaging, 2017 doi: 10.15761/RDI.1000120 abdominal and pelvis CT examinations were chosen for the evaluations because they are most common procedures performed in the radiology department. The hospital ethics committees of King Hamad University Hospital approved the study protocol.","PeriodicalId":11275,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic imaging","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/RDI.1000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find an optimization approach to minimize the absorbed dose to adult patients undergoing CT examination, while maintain the diagnostic image quality. A single detector CT was considered, to represent typical practice in King Hamad University Hospital. We included 626 patients in this study and investigated radiation dose for three anatomical regions, head, chest and abdomen and pelvis. For each type of CT examination, two groups of patients were considered. 383 patients in Group I: were imaged according to the protocols set by the manufacturer. Group II: 243 patients were imaged according to the protocols set by our team after optimization. We were able to adjust the adjustable factors such as noise index, scan time, pitch, rotation time and slice thickness. For each examination the weighted volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded and noise is measured. Each study was also reviewed for image quality. Measured (CTDIvol, DLP) were compared to international reference levels. For Group I, the CTDIvol and DLP values were higher than the reference levels. After Dose optimization the CTDIvol and DLP values were significantly reduced to have lower values than the reference levels. The results of our study showed that the CTDIvol and DLP values taken from images done using the protocols set by the Ct machine developers are higher than the reference levels which indicate that manufacturers are focusing their efforts toward improving image quality rather than the minimizing the dose that can be given to the patient. Correspondence to: Lama Sakhnini, Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Bahrain, Sakhir, Kingdom of Bahrain; E-mail: l_ sakhnini@yahoo.com Received: November 1, 2017; Accepted: December 12, 2017; Published: December 15, 2017 Introduction The use of helical, multislice CT (MSCT) is rapidly growing due to technological improvements in the modern machines. Advances in CT imaging techniques have resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of CT examinations in both adult and children, replacing more and more radiographic examinations. However, CT can be responsible for the increase of carcinogenesis [1-4]. But we have to accept the fact that with the vast improvement of technology, patients benefited from a quicker and more accurate diagnosis and precise anatomic information for planning therapeutic procedures. This lead to a substantial increase in the collective dose, as reported by international organizations (ICRP 2000 and United Nations Scientific Committee 2000) [5]. In spite of this constructive contributions of CT to modern healthcare, attention must also be given to the health risk associated with the ionizing radiation received during a CT exam. Because of this potential radiation risk from this increased use of CT makes it important that CT doses be kept as low as reasonably achievable. However, modern CT scanners have a wide variety of exposure factors and involve techniques that allow dose optimization to the patient [6-9]. Guidelines to optimize the protection of patients during CT procedures have been provided by various international organizations [10-13]. All implemented guidelines include reference doses that are defined as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) or guidance levels. These guidelines assist in the optimization and reduction of patient protection and allow comparisons between the different CT scanners and techniques. The dose parameters suggested in the guidelines are the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) for the entire examination. Although there is still adequate room for improvement, CT dose reduction requires a combination of different approaches or strategies. These include optimization of scanning protocols according to ageor weight-based adjustments, justification of CT use by referring physicians and emergency departments, decrease of unnecessary examinations, development of better exposure protocols by manufacturers, and better training and education for radiological technologists. However, to our knowledge, no reports are available in Bahrain with regard to the investigation of CT scanning protocols. There are no standardized procedures for CT imaging across hospitals in Bahrain, as each hospital has its own specific protocol, which are not necessarily optimized in terms of dose reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the adult CT practice, analyze CT scanning parameters used in routine head, chest and abdomen and pelvis imaging in the radiology department at King Hamad University Hospital. Moreover, our practical goal was to find an optimization approach to minimize the absorbed dose to adult patients undergoing CT examination, while maintain the diagnostic image quality. We hope that the results of this study could be used by radiologists and medical imaging technologists to modify their existing practice and serve as one of the basis for optimization of CT imaging. Additionally, the medical community in Bahrain needs to better educate the public to the risks and benefits associated with CT, such that they can make conscience decisions based on scientific facts regarding their healthcare. Materials and methods Patient examinations In this study, medical images taken by Optima CT660 system (GE Health Care, WI, USA) are considered. Adult head, chest, and Sakhnini L (2017) CT radiation dose optimization and reduction for routine head, chest and abdominal CT examination Volume 2(1): 2-4 Radiol Diagn Imaging, 2017 doi: 10.15761/RDI.1000120 abdominal and pelvis CT examinations were chosen for the evaluations because they are most common procedures performed in the radiology department. The hospital ethics committees of King Hamad University Hospital approved the study protocol.
头颅、胸部、腹部常规CT检查的CT辐射剂量优化与降低
本研究的目的是寻找一种优化方法,在保持诊断图像质量的同时,使接受CT检查的成年患者的吸收剂量最小化。考虑单探头CT,以代表哈马德国王大学医院的典型做法。本研究纳入626例患者,研究了头部、胸腹和骨盆三个解剖区域的辐射剂量。对于每一种类型的CT检查,考虑两组患者。第一组383例患者按照制造商制定的方案进行影像学检查。第二组:243例患者,经优化后按照本组制定的方案进行影像学检查。我们能够调整噪声指数、扫描时间、螺距、旋转时间和切片厚度等可调节因素。每次检查均记录加权体积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度积(DLP),并测量噪声。对每项研究的图像质量也进行了审查。测量值(CTDIvol, DLP)与国际参考水平进行比较。第一组CTDIvol和DLP值均高于参考水平。剂量优化后,CTDIvol和DLP值显著降低至低于参考水平。我们的研究结果表明,使用Ct机开发人员设定的协议从图像中获取的CTDIvol和DLP值高于参考水平,这表明制造商正在努力提高图像质量,而不是尽可能减少给患者的剂量。通讯对象:巴林王国萨希尔巴林大学理学院物理系Lama Sakhnini;邮箱:l_ sakhnini@yahoo.com收稿日期:2017年11月1日;录用日期:2017年12月12日;导论由于现代机器的技术进步,螺旋多层CT (MSCT)的使用正在迅速增长。CT成像技术的进步使得成人和儿童的CT检查频率显著增加,取代了越来越多的x线检查。然而,CT可导致癌变的增加[1-4]。但我们必须接受这样一个事实:随着技术的巨大进步,患者受益于更快、更准确的诊断和精确的解剖信息,从而制定治疗方案。根据国际组织(ICRP 2000和联合国科学委员会2000)的报告,这导致集体剂量大幅增加[5]。尽管CT对现代医疗保健作出了这些建设性贡献,但我们也必须注意到CT检查期间所接受的电离辐射所带来的健康风险。由于CT使用的增加带来了潜在的辐射风险,因此将CT剂量保持在合理可行的最低水平是很重要的。然而,现代CT扫描仪具有各种各样的暴露因素,并涉及允许对患者进行剂量优化的技术[6-9]。各种国际组织已经提供了优化CT过程中患者保护的指南[10-13]。所有实施的指南都包括被定义为诊断参考水平(drl)或指导水平的参考剂量。这些指南有助于优化和减少对患者的保护,并允许对不同的CT扫描仪和技术进行比较。指南中建议的剂量参数是整个检查的体积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度积(DLP)。虽然仍有足够的改进空间,但CT剂量降低需要不同方法或策略的结合。这些措施包括根据年龄或体重调整优化扫描方案,转诊医生和急诊科使用CT的理由,减少不必要的检查,制造商制定更好的暴露方案,以及对放射技术人员进行更好的培训和教育。然而,据我们所知,巴林没有关于CT扫描方案调查的报告。巴林各医院没有CT成像的标准化程序,因为每家医院都有自己的具体方案,这些方案不一定在减少剂量方面得到优化。本研究的目的是评估成人CT实践,分析哈马德国王大学医院放射科常规头部、胸部、腹部和骨盆CT扫描参数。此外,我们的实际目标是找到一种优化方法,使接受CT检查的成人患者的吸收剂量最小化,同时保持诊断图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信