GENERAL THEORETICAL ISSUES RELATED TO ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL EVIDENCE: PROBLEM AND SOLUTION

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
B. Khamidov
{"title":"GENERAL THEORETICAL ISSUES RELATED TO ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL EVIDENCE: PROBLEM AND SOLUTION","authors":"B. Khamidov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.ccj.1.1./pcpb3884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a scientific analysis of the concepts of electronic or digital evidence. In particular, issues related to the legal and technical characteristics of digital evidence, their collection, storage, verification, transportation and evaluation have been investigated. At the same time, the problems and gaps in the practice of national legislation and law enforcement in the field of digital evidence processing have been critically considered. Scientifically based ways and criteria for their elimination have been developed. The article is prepared on the basis of scientific and practical research and opinions of theorists and practitioners conducted in the field of working with digital evidence, as well as technical research. As a result of the research, the methodological rules for working with digital evidence have been analyzed. National legislation, investigative and judicial practice, international experience and practice have been studied, and their achievements and shortcomings have been justified in conclusions. Based on this, the most optimal criteria for law enforcement entities to collect, verify and evaluate digital evidence have been developed. The article analyzes the problems in this area from a systematic, legal, scientific and methodological point of view and provides conclusions on this issue. At the same time, issues related to ensuring the admissibility of digital evidence, its identification and authentication, verification and evaluation of expert opinions are also covered. Scientifically based proposals and recommendations have been developed for the legislator and the subjects applying it.","PeriodicalId":46586,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.ccj.1.1./pcpb3884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a scientific analysis of the concepts of electronic or digital evidence. In particular, issues related to the legal and technical characteristics of digital evidence, their collection, storage, verification, transportation and evaluation have been investigated. At the same time, the problems and gaps in the practice of national legislation and law enforcement in the field of digital evidence processing have been critically considered. Scientifically based ways and criteria for their elimination have been developed. The article is prepared on the basis of scientific and practical research and opinions of theorists and practitioners conducted in the field of working with digital evidence, as well as technical research. As a result of the research, the methodological rules for working with digital evidence have been analyzed. National legislation, investigative and judicial practice, international experience and practice have been studied, and their achievements and shortcomings have been justified in conclusions. Based on this, the most optimal criteria for law enforcement entities to collect, verify and evaluate digital evidence have been developed. The article analyzes the problems in this area from a systematic, legal, scientific and methodological point of view and provides conclusions on this issue. At the same time, issues related to ensuring the admissibility of digital evidence, its identification and authentication, verification and evaluation of expert opinions are also covered. Scientifically based proposals and recommendations have been developed for the legislator and the subjects applying it.
与电子或数字证据相关的一般理论问题:问题与解决方案
本文对电子证据和数字证据的概念进行了科学的分析。特别是,对数字证据的法律和技术特征及其收集、储存、核查、运输和评估等问题进行了调查。同时,对数字证据处理领域国家立法和执法实践中存在的问题和差距进行了批判性思考。已经制定了基于科学的消除方法和标准。本文是根据在数字证据工作领域进行的科学和实践研究以及理论家和实践者的意见以及技术研究编写的。作为研究的结果,分析了处理数字证据的方法规则。对国家立法、调查和司法实践、国际经验和做法进行了研究,并在结论中说明了它们的成就和缺点。在此基础上,制定了执法机构收集、核实和评估数字证据的最优标准。本文从系统的、法律的、科学的和方法论的角度分析了这一领域存在的问题,并给出了结论。同时,还涵盖了与确保数字证据的可采性、数字证据的识别和认证、专家意见的验证和评估有关的问题。为立法者和应用它的主体制定了基于科学的提案和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice publishes quarterly coverage of the theoretical and scientific aspects of the study of crime and the practical problems of law enforcement, administration of justice and the treatment of offenders, particularly in the Canadian context. Since 1958, this peer-reviewed journal has provided a forum for original contributions and discussions in the fields of criminology and criminal justice. This bilingual, peer-reviewed journal was previously called the Canadian Journal of Criminology, the Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, and the Canadian Journal of Corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信