Effects of In vivo versus Simulation-Plus-In vivo training on the acquisition and generalization of grocery item selection by high school students with severe handicaps

John J. McDonnell , Robert H. Horner
{"title":"Effects of In vivo versus Simulation-Plus-In vivo training on the acquisition and generalization of grocery item selection by high school students with severe handicaps","authors":"John J. McDonnell ,&nbsp;Robert H. Horner","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(85)90003-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, high school students with moderate and severe retardation were trained to locate 15 grocery items through Isolated In vivo training and Simulation-Plus-In vivo training. Isolated in vivo training consisted of daily instruction in locating 15 target items in a single store located near the subjects' school. Simulation plus in vivo training included training with slides of grocery store aisles and shelves in the classroom plus training in a single store located near the students' school. Generalized responding was assessed through a multiple-baseline design across subjects in three novel grocery stores and validated in a store frequented by the students' families. Results indicate that generalization was more likely when the range of stimulus variation in training examples was expanded via in-class simulations. The results are discussed in terms of procedures for teaching generalized skills and guidelines that can be used by teachers for developing effective classroom-based simulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(85)90003-5","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468485900035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

In the present study, high school students with moderate and severe retardation were trained to locate 15 grocery items through Isolated In vivo training and Simulation-Plus-In vivo training. Isolated in vivo training consisted of daily instruction in locating 15 target items in a single store located near the subjects' school. Simulation plus in vivo training included training with slides of grocery store aisles and shelves in the classroom plus training in a single store located near the students' school. Generalized responding was assessed through a multiple-baseline design across subjects in three novel grocery stores and validated in a store frequented by the students' families. Results indicate that generalization was more likely when the range of stimulus variation in training examples was expanded via in-class simulations. The results are discussed in terms of procedures for teaching generalized skills and guidelines that can be used by teachers for developing effective classroom-based simulations.

在体训练与模拟加在体训练对严重残疾高中生杂货商品选择习得与泛化的影响
本研究以中重度发育迟缓高中生为研究对象,采用离体训练和模拟加体内训练的方法,对15种食品杂货商品进行定位训练。孤立的体内训练包括每天在被试学校附近的一家商店里找到15种目标物品。模拟加体内训练包括在教室里用杂货店过道和货架的幻灯片进行训练,以及在学生学校附近的一家商店进行训练。在三家新型杂货店中,通过多基线设计对受试者进行广义反应评估,并在学生家庭经常光顾的商店中进行验证。结果表明,通过课堂模拟,当训练样本的刺激变化范围扩大时,泛化的可能性更大。结果讨论了教学程序的通用技能和指导方针,可用于教师开发有效的基于课堂的模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信