THE CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF ECOLOGICAL—STATUS ASSESSMENTS USING DIATOMS

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
M. Kelly, L. King, Bernadette Ní Chatháin
{"title":"THE CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF ECOLOGICAL—STATUS ASSESSMENTS USING DIATOMS","authors":"M. Kelly, L. King, Bernadette Ní Chatháin","doi":"10.3318/BIOE.2009.109.3.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Most member states of the EU have chosen to use existing diatom-based metrics for assessment of ecological status, as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD), rather than develop new methods. In this paper we assess the suitability of such methods in light of the requirements of the normative definitions of ecological status. In particular, we focus on the rationale for the placement of ecological-status boundaries. As the WFD defines ecological status in terms of the 'structure and functioning' of aquatic ecosystems, we interpret changes in the diatom assemblage in light of changes in entire phytobenthos. Whilst we believe that analysis of diatom assemblages is a sensible approach to developing a first generation of WFD-compatible tools, bearing in mind tight deadlines and limited budgets, the potential of non-diatoms should not be ignored when developing future methods.","PeriodicalId":55370,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Environment-Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy","volume":"14 1","pages":"175 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Environment-Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3318/BIOE.2009.109.3.175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Abstract:Most member states of the EU have chosen to use existing diatom-based metrics for assessment of ecological status, as required by the Water Framework Directive (WFD), rather than develop new methods. In this paper we assess the suitability of such methods in light of the requirements of the normative definitions of ecological status. In particular, we focus on the rationale for the placement of ecological-status boundaries. As the WFD defines ecological status in terms of the 'structure and functioning' of aquatic ecosystems, we interpret changes in the diatom assemblage in light of changes in entire phytobenthos. Whilst we believe that analysis of diatom assemblages is a sensible approach to developing a first generation of WFD-compatible tools, bearing in mind tight deadlines and limited budgets, the potential of non-diatoms should not be ignored when developing future methods.
利用硅藻进行生态状况评价的概念基础
摘要:根据水框架指令(WFD)的要求,大多数欧盟成员国选择使用现有的基于硅藻的指标来评估生态状况,而不是开发新的方法。在本文中,我们根据生态状况规范定义的要求,评估这些方法的适用性。我们特别关注设置生态地位界限的理由。由于WFD根据水生生态系统的“结构和功能”来定义生态状况,我们根据整个底栖植物的变化来解释硅藻组合的变化。虽然我们认为分析硅藻组合是开发第一代wfd兼容工具的明智方法,但考虑到紧迫的期限和有限的预算,在开发未来方法时不应忽视非硅藻的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to offer a broad coverage of the subject area, including the following: - biology and ecology of the Irish flora and fauna - microbial ecology - animal, plant and environmental physiology - global change - palaeoecology and palaeoclimatology - population biology; conservation of genetic resources - pollution and environmental quality; ecotoxicology - environmental management - hydrology - land use, agriculture, soils and environment. Submissions on other relevant topics are also welcome, and papers of a cross-disciplinary nature are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书