The modern trends in alcohol, drugs and driving research

Elke Raes , Kristof Pil , Alain G. Verstraete
{"title":"The modern trends in alcohol, drugs and driving research","authors":"Elke Raes ,&nbsp;Kristof Pil ,&nbsp;Alain G. Verstraete","doi":"10.1016/j.fsisup.2009.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on alcohol, drugs<span> and driving can be broadly separated into experimental and epidemiological studies. Every approach has its inherent advantages and disadvantages. Experimental studies can result in an interpretation by single cause, but can only identify potential risks, and the results can sometimes be of limited value because of the use of non-realistic doses or because of the drug use history or inter-individual differences of the volunteers. Recent studies have used higher, more realistic doses and paid more attention to the combination of alcohol and drugs and have shown that the chronic use of illicit drugs<span> can be associated with some cognitive and/or psychomotor impairment, and can lead to a decrease in driving performance even when the subject is no longer intoxicated.</span></span></p><p>Epidemiological studies include roadside surveys, studies in a subset of drivers, accident risk studies, responsibility analyses, surveys and pharmaco-epidemiological studies. Between studies, results may be incomparable due to testing different populations, different kinds of samples, etc. More large-scale roadside studies are conducted now.</p><p>Advances in analytical toxicology have also contributed to a better understanding of the risks associated with driving under the influence. While older studies measured the inactive metabolite THC-COOH and did not show an increased risk in cannabis-positive drivers, more recent studies measured the active THC in blood and did show a concentration dependent increase in crash risk. The use of LC–MS/MS has allowed more broad-range screening as this technique can measure many different drugs in a small sample volume. While some older studies used saliva but had many analytical problems (including an insufficient sample volume in up to a third of the cases), newer methods of saliva sampling and analysis give better results. The use of saliva for roadside surveys allows non-invasive sampling, but the lack of correlation with the concentrations in blood makes interpretation of results difficult.</p><p>The results of both epidemiological and experimental studies should be combined to obtain a good estimate of the impact of certain drugs on driving performance and accident risk. In 2006–07 a committee of international experts drafted guidelines for future research into drugs and driving. These have been taken on board by the DRUID project, a large-scale EU funded project on driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol and medicines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100550,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International Supplement Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fsisup.2009.07.004","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875174109000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research on alcohol, drugs and driving can be broadly separated into experimental and epidemiological studies. Every approach has its inherent advantages and disadvantages. Experimental studies can result in an interpretation by single cause, but can only identify potential risks, and the results can sometimes be of limited value because of the use of non-realistic doses or because of the drug use history or inter-individual differences of the volunteers. Recent studies have used higher, more realistic doses and paid more attention to the combination of alcohol and drugs and have shown that the chronic use of illicit drugs can be associated with some cognitive and/or psychomotor impairment, and can lead to a decrease in driving performance even when the subject is no longer intoxicated.

Epidemiological studies include roadside surveys, studies in a subset of drivers, accident risk studies, responsibility analyses, surveys and pharmaco-epidemiological studies. Between studies, results may be incomparable due to testing different populations, different kinds of samples, etc. More large-scale roadside studies are conducted now.

Advances in analytical toxicology have also contributed to a better understanding of the risks associated with driving under the influence. While older studies measured the inactive metabolite THC-COOH and did not show an increased risk in cannabis-positive drivers, more recent studies measured the active THC in blood and did show a concentration dependent increase in crash risk. The use of LC–MS/MS has allowed more broad-range screening as this technique can measure many different drugs in a small sample volume. While some older studies used saliva but had many analytical problems (including an insufficient sample volume in up to a third of the cases), newer methods of saliva sampling and analysis give better results. The use of saliva for roadside surveys allows non-invasive sampling, but the lack of correlation with the concentrations in blood makes interpretation of results difficult.

The results of both epidemiological and experimental studies should be combined to obtain a good estimate of the impact of certain drugs on driving performance and accident risk. In 2006–07 a committee of international experts drafted guidelines for future research into drugs and driving. These have been taken on board by the DRUID project, a large-scale EU funded project on driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol and medicines.

酒精、毒品和驾驶研究的现代趋势
对酒精、毒品和驾驶的研究可以大致分为实验研究和流行病学研究。每种方法都有其固有的优点和缺点。实验研究可以得出单一原因的解释,但只能确定潜在的风险,并且由于使用的剂量不实际或由于使用药物的历史或志愿者的个体间差异,结果有时价值有限。最近的研究使用了更高、更实际的剂量,并更多地关注酒精和药物的结合,研究表明,长期使用非法药物可能与某些认知和/或精神运动障碍有关,即使受试者不再醉酒,也可能导致驾驶性能下降。流行病学研究包括路边调查、部分司机研究、事故风险研究、责任分析、调查和药物流行病学研究。在不同的研究之间,由于测试不同的人群,不同种类的样本等,结果可能无法比较。更多的大型路边研究正在进行。分析毒理学方面的进展也有助于更好地了解与酒后驾驶有关的风险。虽然较早的研究测量了非活性代谢物THC- cooh,并没有显示大麻阳性驾驶员的风险增加,但最近的研究测量了血液中的活性THC,确实显示了浓度依赖性的撞车风险增加。LC-MS /MS的使用允许更广泛的筛选,因为该技术可以在小样本量中测量许多不同的药物。虽然一些较早的研究使用唾液,但存在许多分析问题(包括多达三分之一的病例中样本量不足),但较新的唾液取样和分析方法给出了更好的结果。使用唾液进行路边调查允许非侵入性采样,但缺乏与血液浓度的相关性,使得解释结果变得困难。流行病学和实验研究的结果应该结合起来,以获得对某些药物对驾驶性能和事故风险的影响的良好估计。2006-07年,一个由国际专家组成的委员会起草了关于未来药物与驾驶研究的指导方针。德鲁伊项目是一个由欧盟资助的关于在毒品、酒精和药物影响下驾驶的大型项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信