E-Cig Tipping Points vs. FDA Deeming Regulations

J. Nitzkin
{"title":"E-Cig Tipping Points vs. FDA Deeming Regulations","authors":"J. Nitzkin","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-cigarettes and related vapor products (e-cigs) are here to stay. They have tipped from a fad to a permanent part of the tobacco product scene. They now constitute a ten year old multibillion dollar industry in the United States. More likely than not, they offer personal and public health benefits far exceeding theoretically plausible harms. The current FDA “deeming” regulations threaten to eliminate more than 99% of e-cig products by imposing requirements so costly that few can afford to apply. Federal regulation of all tobacco-related products is needed to best protect the health of the public. Instead, the current regulations protect cigarettes from competition from e-cigs and other lowrisk alternatives and threaten to drive dedicated e-cig users back to cigarettes or to hazardous contraband and home-made products. Alternatives to the current regulations are proposed.","PeriodicalId":14828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

E-cigarettes and related vapor products (e-cigs) are here to stay. They have tipped from a fad to a permanent part of the tobacco product scene. They now constitute a ten year old multibillion dollar industry in the United States. More likely than not, they offer personal and public health benefits far exceeding theoretically plausible harms. The current FDA “deeming” regulations threaten to eliminate more than 99% of e-cig products by imposing requirements so costly that few can afford to apply. Federal regulation of all tobacco-related products is needed to best protect the health of the public. Instead, the current regulations protect cigarettes from competition from e-cigs and other lowrisk alternatives and threaten to drive dedicated e-cig users back to cigarettes or to hazardous contraband and home-made products. Alternatives to the current regulations are proposed.
电子烟引爆点vs FDA认定法规
电子烟和相关蒸汽产品(e-cigs)将继续存在。它们已经从一种时尚变成了烟草产品场景中永久的一部分。它们现在在美国构成了一个有10年历史、价值数十亿美元的产业。更有可能的是,它们给个人和公共健康带来的好处远远超过理论上合理的危害。目前FDA的“认定”规定,由于要求的成本太高,几乎没有人能负担得起,因此有可能淘汰99%以上的电子烟产品。需要对所有烟草相关产品进行联邦监管,以最好地保护公众的健康。相反,目前的规定保护香烟免受电子烟和其他低风险替代品的竞争,并有可能迫使专门的电子烟用户重新使用香烟或危险的违禁品和自制产品。提出了现行规定的替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信