La co-gestión de Políticas Públicas Sociales entre Estado y sociedad civil: El aporte de la Psicología Social Comunitaria a la construcción del diálogo entre actores diversos

Alicia Rodríguez
{"title":"La co-gestión de Políticas Públicas Sociales entre Estado y sociedad civil: El aporte de la Psicología Social Comunitaria a la construcción del diálogo entre actores diversos","authors":"Alicia Rodríguez","doi":"10.7728/0402201306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the contribution of Social Community Psychology (SCP) to the development of understanding and participation in the context of social public policies (SPP) that are co-managed between the State and civil society. We provide an analysis of the complexity of the socio-political setting, and the importance of considering psychosocial and subjective processes when aiming to strengthen the participation of civil society organizations (CSOs) and the population targeted by the policy. We present an intervention developed by the Faculty of Psychology at the University of the Republic (Uruguay) in a comprehensive care program for early childhood in poor areas, carried out by the provincial government of Montevideo in partnership with CSOs. We describe and analyze the construction of the problem of the intervention and develop the methodological strategy carried out in that context, the techniques used and the results obtained, after explaining the concept of participation and co-management. In keeping with the construction of the problem, the methodological strategy was formulated following three purposes: (1) to integrate the different voices that constitute the program, (2) to build dialogic spaces, and (3) to alternate a look a the whole program with a focus on unique processes that were deployed in the various early education centers. We discuss techniques, tools and materials to promote collective and participatory work, to socialize and discuss the findings, conclusions and questions about participation in early education centers. We conclude that the contribution of the SCP to SPP requires consistency between an analysis of the complexity of the field and an intervention strategy that is flexible and dynamic. When there is an interest in developing a social policy that will strengthen participation and democracy, the association with potential contributions of SCP is favored. However, this does not mean the absence of contradictions and conflicts in the process, some of which are expressions of the stress of a leftist government within the framework of a capitalist state.","PeriodicalId":87260,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of community psychology practice","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of community psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7728/0402201306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents the contribution of Social Community Psychology (SCP) to the development of understanding and participation in the context of social public policies (SPP) that are co-managed between the State and civil society. We provide an analysis of the complexity of the socio-political setting, and the importance of considering psychosocial and subjective processes when aiming to strengthen the participation of civil society organizations (CSOs) and the population targeted by the policy. We present an intervention developed by the Faculty of Psychology at the University of the Republic (Uruguay) in a comprehensive care program for early childhood in poor areas, carried out by the provincial government of Montevideo in partnership with CSOs. We describe and analyze the construction of the problem of the intervention and develop the methodological strategy carried out in that context, the techniques used and the results obtained, after explaining the concept of participation and co-management. In keeping with the construction of the problem, the methodological strategy was formulated following three purposes: (1) to integrate the different voices that constitute the program, (2) to build dialogic spaces, and (3) to alternate a look a the whole program with a focus on unique processes that were deployed in the various early education centers. We discuss techniques, tools and materials to promote collective and participatory work, to socialize and discuss the findings, conclusions and questions about participation in early education centers. We conclude that the contribution of the SCP to SPP requires consistency between an analysis of the complexity of the field and an intervention strategy that is flexible and dynamic. When there is an interest in developing a social policy that will strengthen participation and democracy, the association with potential contributions of SCP is favored. However, this does not mean the absence of contradictions and conflicts in the process, some of which are expressions of the stress of a leftist government within the framework of a capitalist state.
国家与公民社会共同管理社会公共政策:社区社会心理学对不同行动者之间对话建设的贡献
本文介绍了社会社区心理学(SCP)在国家和民间社会共同管理的社会公共政策(SPP)背景下对理解和参与发展的贡献。我们分析了社会政治环境的复杂性,以及在旨在加强民间社会组织(cso)和政策目标人群的参与时考虑社会心理和主观过程的重要性。我们在蒙得维的亚省政府与民间社会组织合作开展的贫困地区幼儿综合护理项目中,介绍了乌拉圭共和国大学心理学院开发的一项干预措施。在解释了参与和共同管理的概念之后,我们描述和分析了干预问题的构建,并制定了在此背景下实施的方法学策略、使用的技术和获得的结果。为了与问题的构建保持一致,方法学策略的制定遵循三个目的:(1)整合构成项目的不同声音,(2)建立对话空间,(3)对整个项目进行交替观察,重点关注各个早教中心部署的独特过程。我们讨论的技术,工具和材料,以促进集体和参与性的工作,社会化和讨论的发现,结论和问题参与早教中心。我们得出结论,SCP对SPP的贡献需要对该领域复杂性的分析与灵活动态的干预策略之间的一致性。当有兴趣制定一项社会政策,将加强参与和民主,与SCP的潜在贡献的联系是有利的。然而,这并不意味着在这个过程中没有矛盾和冲突,其中一些是资本主义国家框架内左翼政府压力的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信