Is There Personalization in Twitter Search? A Study on polarized opinions about the Brazilian Welfare Reform

J. Santos, S. Siqueira, B. Nunes, P. Balestrassi, F. H. S. Pereira
{"title":"Is There Personalization in Twitter Search? A Study on polarized opinions about the Brazilian Welfare Reform","authors":"J. Santos, S. Siqueira, B. Nunes, P. Balestrassi, F. H. S. Pereira","doi":"10.1145/3394231.3397917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personalization algorithms play an essential role in the way search platforms fetch results to users. While there are many empirical studies about the effects of these algorithms on Web searches like Google and Bing, reports about personalization on social media searches are rare. This exploratory study aims to understand and quantify the limits of personalization in Twitter search results. We developed a measurement methodology and agents to train a pair of polarized Twitter accounts and simultaneously collected search results from these accounts. The agents were run in a political context, the Brazilian Welfare Reform. Our findings show a significant amount of personalization differences when we compare search results from a new fresh profile to non-fresh ones. Peculiarly, little evidence for differences between two profiles that followed different accounts with polarized viewpoints about the same topic was found – the filter bubble hypothesis cannot be null.","PeriodicalId":93136,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","volume":"32 1","pages":"267-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Personalization algorithms play an essential role in the way search platforms fetch results to users. While there are many empirical studies about the effects of these algorithms on Web searches like Google and Bing, reports about personalization on social media searches are rare. This exploratory study aims to understand and quantify the limits of personalization in Twitter search results. We developed a measurement methodology and agents to train a pair of polarized Twitter accounts and simultaneously collected search results from these accounts. The agents were run in a political context, the Brazilian Welfare Reform. Our findings show a significant amount of personalization differences when we compare search results from a new fresh profile to non-fresh ones. Peculiarly, little evidence for differences between two profiles that followed different accounts with polarized viewpoints about the same topic was found – the filter bubble hypothesis cannot be null.
推特搜索有个性化吗?关于巴西福利改革的两极分化意见研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信