The Role of Histopathological Outcome on Pain of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomised Trial

E. Ozah, E. Ezenwa
{"title":"The Role of Histopathological Outcome on Pain of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomised Trial","authors":"E. Ozah, E. Ezenwa","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i05/1677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate. The pain of prostate biopsy is of immense challenge. Many factors have been ascribed to it. Identifying such risk factors will assist in mitigating the pain associated with this procedure. This study therefore aims to assess the role of histopathological outcome on pain of TRUS guided prostate biopsy. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized study carried out in University of Benin Teaching Hospital over a 1year period between 2017 and 2018. Consecutive patients who met indications for biopsy were randomized into Group A: intrarectal xylocaine gel group and Group B: periprostatic block group. Pain was assessed during probe insertion, biopsy and one hour post biopsy using an 11-point visual analogue scale. Association between mean pain scores and histological diagnosis in both groups was assessed using the independent t- test, association between use of intrarectal xylocain gel, periprostatic block was done using the independent t-test. Level of significance set at p <0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean pain score during probe insertion, biopsy and post biopsy (p=0.3888), (p=0.089) and (p=0.584) respectively between benign and malignant histological diagnosis for Group A, while there was also no statistically significant difference in mean pain score during probe insertion, biopsy and post biopsy (p=0.266), (p=0.506) and (p=0.522) respectively between benign and malignant histological diagnosis in Group B. Cancer detection rate for Group A and Group B was 64.3% and 59.1% respectively, which was not statistically significant p=0.662. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that pain of TRUS guided prostate biopsy is not influenced by histopathological outcome irrespective of mode of anaesthesia. Cancer detection rate was also not influenced by choice of anaesthesia during TRUS guided prostate biopsy.","PeriodicalId":14008,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i05/1677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate. The pain of prostate biopsy is of immense challenge. Many factors have been ascribed to it. Identifying such risk factors will assist in mitigating the pain associated with this procedure. This study therefore aims to assess the role of histopathological outcome on pain of TRUS guided prostate biopsy. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized study carried out in University of Benin Teaching Hospital over a 1year period between 2017 and 2018. Consecutive patients who met indications for biopsy were randomized into Group A: intrarectal xylocaine gel group and Group B: periprostatic block group. Pain was assessed during probe insertion, biopsy and one hour post biopsy using an 11-point visual analogue scale. Association between mean pain scores and histological diagnosis in both groups was assessed using the independent t- test, association between use of intrarectal xylocain gel, periprostatic block was done using the independent t-test. Level of significance set at p <0.05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean pain score during probe insertion, biopsy and post biopsy (p=0.3888), (p=0.089) and (p=0.584) respectively between benign and malignant histological diagnosis for Group A, while there was also no statistically significant difference in mean pain score during probe insertion, biopsy and post biopsy (p=0.266), (p=0.506) and (p=0.522) respectively between benign and malignant histological diagnosis in Group B. Cancer detection rate for Group A and Group B was 64.3% and 59.1% respectively, which was not statistically significant p=0.662. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that pain of TRUS guided prostate biopsy is not influenced by histopathological outcome irrespective of mode of anaesthesia. Cancer detection rate was also not influenced by choice of anaesthesia during TRUS guided prostate biopsy.
组织病理学结果在经直肠超声引导前列腺活检疼痛中的作用:一项随机试验
导读:经直肠超声引导前列腺活检是诊断前列腺癌的金标准。前列腺活检的痛苦是一个巨大的挑战。许多因素都归因于此。识别这些危险因素将有助于减轻与此过程相关的疼痛。因此,本研究旨在评估组织病理学结果在TRUS引导下前列腺活检疼痛中的作用。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性随机研究,于2017年至2018年在贝宁大学教学医院进行。连续符合活检指征的患者随机分为A组:直肠内木卡因凝胶组和B组:前列腺周围阻滞组。在探针插入、活检和活检后一小时使用11点视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。采用独立t检验评估两组患者的平均疼痛评分与组织学诊断之间的相关性,采用独立t检验评估直肠内木聚糖凝胶与前列腺周围阻滞的使用之间的相关性。显著性水平为p <0.05。结果:A组良性与恶性组织学诊断时插入、活检和活检后的平均疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.3888)、(p=0.089)和(p=0.584),插入、活检和活检后的平均疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.266)。B组患者的良恶性组织学诊断率(p=0.506)、恶性组织学诊断率(p=0.522)分别为64.3%、59.1%,差异无统计学意义p=0.662。结论:研究表明,无论麻醉方式如何,TRUS引导下前列腺活检的疼痛不受组织病理学结果的影响。在TRUS引导下前列腺活检时,肿瘤检出率也不受麻醉选择的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信