A Numerical Study of Tertiary Oil Recovery by Injection of Low-Salinity Water

A. Wattan, Mohammed S. Aljwad, U. Alameedy
{"title":"A Numerical Study of Tertiary Oil Recovery by Injection of Low-Salinity Water","authors":"A. Wattan, Mohammed S. Aljwad, U. Alameedy","doi":"10.52716/jprs.v13i1.674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The injection of Low Salinity Water (LSWI) as an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) method has recently attracted a lot of attention. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate and identify the positive effects of LSWI on oil recovery.\nIn order to demonstrate the impact of introducing low salinity water into a reservoir, simulations on the ECLIPSE 100 simulator are being done in this work. To simulate an actual reservoir, an easy static model was made. In order to replicate the effects of injecting low salinity water and normal salinity, or seawater, the reservoir is three-phase with oil, gas, and water. It has one injector and one producer.\nFive cases were suggested to investigate the effect of low salinity water injection with different concentrations and the period of injection.\nThe low salinity injection period varied from twenty-five years in case one and reduced five years in each case until reached to five years in final case.\nHigher oil recovery factor obtained in case one with injection time twenty-five years and lower recovery factor for case five with injection time of low salinity water injection five years.\nLower water concentration gives higher oil recovery for all cases where this study investigated the effect of low-salinity water flooding as slug injection.\nFrom the five cases presented, field oil recovery factor (FOE), field oil production rate (FOPR), field oil production total (FOPT), field pressure (FP), and field water cut (FWCT) were observed. Oil recovery is 56.6 percent in high salinity water flooding (HSWF), and 71.8 percent in low salinity water flooding (LSWF) for 0 percent salt concentration and 62.40 percent for 20 percent salt concentration as in case one.","PeriodicalId":16710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v13i1.674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The injection of Low Salinity Water (LSWI) as an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) method has recently attracted a lot of attention. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate and identify the positive effects of LSWI on oil recovery. In order to demonstrate the impact of introducing low salinity water into a reservoir, simulations on the ECLIPSE 100 simulator are being done in this work. To simulate an actual reservoir, an easy static model was made. In order to replicate the effects of injecting low salinity water and normal salinity, or seawater, the reservoir is three-phase with oil, gas, and water. It has one injector and one producer. Five cases were suggested to investigate the effect of low salinity water injection with different concentrations and the period of injection. The low salinity injection period varied from twenty-five years in case one and reduced five years in each case until reached to five years in final case. Higher oil recovery factor obtained in case one with injection time twenty-five years and lower recovery factor for case five with injection time of low salinity water injection five years. Lower water concentration gives higher oil recovery for all cases where this study investigated the effect of low-salinity water flooding as slug injection. From the five cases presented, field oil recovery factor (FOE), field oil production rate (FOPR), field oil production total (FOPT), field pressure (FP), and field water cut (FWCT) were observed. Oil recovery is 56.6 percent in high salinity water flooding (HSWF), and 71.8 percent in low salinity water flooding (LSWF) for 0 percent salt concentration and 62.40 percent for 20 percent salt concentration as in case one.
低矿化度注水三次采油数值研究
注低矿化度水(LSWI)作为一种提高采收率(EOR)的方法近年来引起了人们的广泛关注。为了调查和确定LSWI对采收率的积极影响,已经进行了广泛的研究。为了证明在油藏中引入低盐度水的影响,在ECLIPSE 100模拟器上进行了模拟。为了模拟实际油藏,建立了简单的静态模型。为了复制注入低矿化度水和正常矿化度水(即海水)的效果,储层是油、气、水三相的。它有一个注入器和一个生产者。建议对5例患者进行不同浓度低矿化度水注射及注射周期的效果观察。低矿化度注入周期从案例1的25年开始变化,每个案例减少5年,直到最后一个案例达到5年。注时间为25年的案例1采收率较高,注时间为5年的案例5采收率较低。在本研究中,低矿化度水驱作为段塞流注入的效果得到了更高的采收率。从上述5个案例中,观察了油田采收率(FOE)、油田产油量(FOPR)、油田总产油量(FOPT)、油田压力(FP)和油田含水率(FWCT)。当盐浓度为0%时,高矿化度水驱(HSWF)的采收率为56.6%,当盐浓度为20%时,低矿化度水驱(LSWF)的采收率为71.8%,当盐浓度为20%时采收率为62.40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信