EFFECT OF THE PSEUDOTIME FUNCTION ON GAS RESERVOIR DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATION

IF 0.5 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
F. Escobar, A. Lopez, José-Humberto Cantillo
{"title":"EFFECT OF THE PSEUDOTIME FUNCTION ON GAS RESERVOIR DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATION","authors":"F. Escobar, A. Lopez, José-Humberto Cantillo","doi":"10.29047/01225383.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gas flow equation is normally linearized to allow the liquid solution of the diffusivity equation to satisfy gas behavior when analyzing transient test data of gas reservoirs. When wellbore storage conditions are insignificant, drawdown tests are best analyzed using the pseudopressure function. On the other hand, buildup pressure tests require linearization of both pseudotime and pseudopressure. It is not the case for the TDS technique which is indifferently applied to either drawdown or buildup tests. However, whichever the case, pseudotime has certain effect at very long testing times in formations of moderate to high permeability.  In this paper, we implemented the Tiab’s Direct Synthesis (TDS) technique, to include pseudotime effects, and observe its influence on the interpretation results of gas well test data at early and late time periods. New analytical equations to estimate reservoir permeability, wellbore storage coefficient, pseudoskin factor and reservoir drainage area are presented. Then, a comparison of results against rigorous time was carried out for simulated and field cases. We found acceptable results for permeability, pseudoskin factor and wellbore storage coefficient. However, for the case of reservoir drainage area, the deviation error was of 4,1% for a simulated case and 17,9% for a field case. However, the smaller of these deviations may be small if related to pressure transient analysis results. However, this deviation in a gas reservoir with reserves of one tera standard cubic feet is equivalent to a huge difference of 38 gigas of standard cubic feet of gas which may have an economic impact to any oil company.","PeriodicalId":55200,"journal":{"name":"Ct&f-Ciencia Tecnologia Y Futuro","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ct&f-Ciencia Tecnologia Y Futuro","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The gas flow equation is normally linearized to allow the liquid solution of the diffusivity equation to satisfy gas behavior when analyzing transient test data of gas reservoirs. When wellbore storage conditions are insignificant, drawdown tests are best analyzed using the pseudopressure function. On the other hand, buildup pressure tests require linearization of both pseudotime and pseudopressure. It is not the case for the TDS technique which is indifferently applied to either drawdown or buildup tests. However, whichever the case, pseudotime has certain effect at very long testing times in formations of moderate to high permeability.  In this paper, we implemented the Tiab’s Direct Synthesis (TDS) technique, to include pseudotime effects, and observe its influence on the interpretation results of gas well test data at early and late time periods. New analytical equations to estimate reservoir permeability, wellbore storage coefficient, pseudoskin factor and reservoir drainage area are presented. Then, a comparison of results against rigorous time was carried out for simulated and field cases. We found acceptable results for permeability, pseudoskin factor and wellbore storage coefficient. However, for the case of reservoir drainage area, the deviation error was of 4,1% for a simulated case and 17,9% for a field case. However, the smaller of these deviations may be small if related to pressure transient analysis results. However, this deviation in a gas reservoir with reserves of one tera standard cubic feet is equivalent to a huge difference of 38 gigas of standard cubic feet of gas which may have an economic impact to any oil company.
拟时间函数对气藏排水面积确定的影响
在分析气藏瞬态测试数据时,对气体流动方程进行了正态线性化处理,使扩散方程的液相解能够满足气相特性。当井筒储存条件不显著时,降压测试最好使用伪压力函数进行分析。另一方面,累积压力测试需要对伪时间和伪压力进行线性化。对于TDS技术来说,情况并非如此,它被冷漠地应用于降压或累积测试。然而,无论哪种情况,在中高渗地层中,在很长的测试时间内,假时间都有一定的影响。在本文中,我们实施了Tiab的直接综合(TDS)技术,包括伪时间效应,并观察了其对早期和后期气井测试数据解释结果的影响。提出了新的储层渗透率、井筒储集系数、伪表皮系数和储层泄油面积的解析方程。然后,对模拟和现场实例进行了严格时间下的结果比较。渗透率、假表皮系数和井筒储层系数的测量结果都可以接受。然而,对于储层排水区域,模拟情况下的偏差为4.1%,实际情况下的偏差为17.9%。然而,如果与压力瞬态分析结果相关,这些偏差中较小的可能很小。然而,在储量为1兆标准立方英尺的气藏中,这种偏差相当于38千兆标准立方英尺天然气的巨大差异,这可能会对任何石油公司产生经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ct&f-Ciencia Tecnologia Y Futuro
Ct&f-Ciencia Tecnologia Y Futuro Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of CT&F is to publish the achievements of scientific research and technological developments of Ecopetrol S.A. and the research of other institutions in the field of oil, gas and alternative energy sources. CT&F welcomes original, novel and high-impact contributions from all the fields in the oil and gas industry like: Acquisition and Exploration technologies, Basins characterization and modeling, Petroleum geology, Reservoir modeling, Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies, Unconventional resources, Petroleum refining, Petrochemistry, Upgrading technologies, Technologies for fuels quality, Process modeling, and optimization, Supply chain optimization, Biofuels, Renewable energies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信