Antibiotic Resistance Profile Among Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Clinical and Environmental Isolates

S. Emami, J. Nowroozi, R. Abiri, P. Mohajeri
{"title":"Antibiotic Resistance Profile Among Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Clinical and Environmental Isolates","authors":"S. Emami, J. Nowroozi, R. Abiri, P. Mohajeri","doi":"10.5812/jkums-135470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the resistance profile of Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia isolates -collected from clinical and environmental sources in a hospital- for different antibiotics to clarify their clonal relatedness. Methods: In this study, a total of 22 S. maltophilia isolates collected from 400 different clinical and environmental samples from Imam Reza Hospital were subjected to the analysis. Antibiotic susceptibility testing for each isolate was carried out by the disc diffusion method and according to the CLSI guidelines. Results: Among 22 S. maltophilia isolates, ten isolates were obtained from clinical specimens, and 12 were obtained from the environment. The isolates showed the lowest and highest antibiotic resistance to chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (18.2%) and meropenem (100%), respectively, and resistance to the other antibiotics were as follows: Chloramphenicol 18.2%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 18.2%, gentamicin 22.7%, tobramycin 50.0%, aztreonam 63.6%, amikacin 63.6, ceftriaxone 68.2%, and ceftazidime 68.2%. The antibiotic profile of S. maltophilia strains differed from tobramycin, aztreonam, amikacin, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin between clinical and environmental samples. Conclusions: Based on the high antibiotic resistance of S.maltophilia isolates and various responses to the selected antibiotic, chloramphenicol is the best therapeutic option, with 81.8% susceptibility. The early diagnosis and determination of antibiotic resistance patterns have the utmost importance.","PeriodicalId":16201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-135470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the resistance profile of Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia isolates -collected from clinical and environmental sources in a hospital- for different antibiotics to clarify their clonal relatedness. Methods: In this study, a total of 22 S. maltophilia isolates collected from 400 different clinical and environmental samples from Imam Reza Hospital were subjected to the analysis. Antibiotic susceptibility testing for each isolate was carried out by the disc diffusion method and according to the CLSI guidelines. Results: Among 22 S. maltophilia isolates, ten isolates were obtained from clinical specimens, and 12 were obtained from the environment. The isolates showed the lowest and highest antibiotic resistance to chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (18.2%) and meropenem (100%), respectively, and resistance to the other antibiotics were as follows: Chloramphenicol 18.2%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 18.2%, gentamicin 22.7%, tobramycin 50.0%, aztreonam 63.6%, amikacin 63.6, ceftriaxone 68.2%, and ceftazidime 68.2%. The antibiotic profile of S. maltophilia strains differed from tobramycin, aztreonam, amikacin, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin between clinical and environmental samples. Conclusions: Based on the high antibiotic resistance of S.maltophilia isolates and various responses to the selected antibiotic, chloramphenicol is the best therapeutic option, with 81.8% susceptibility. The early diagnosis and determination of antibiotic resistance patterns have the utmost importance.
嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌临床及环境分离株抗生素耐药性分析
目的:比较某医院临床和环境来源的嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌对不同抗生素的耐药情况,以阐明其克隆相关性。方法:对伊玛目礼萨医院400份不同临床和环境样本中分离的22株嗜麦芽链球菌进行分析。采用圆盘扩散法并按照CLSI指南对各分离株进行抗生素药敏试验。结果:22株嗜麦芽葡萄球菌中,临床分离10株,环境分离12株。菌株对氯霉素、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和美罗培南的耐药率分别为18.2%、18.2%、18.2%、庆大霉素22.7%、妥布霉素50.0%、氨曲南63.6%、阿米卡星63.6%、头孢曲松68.2%、头孢他啶68.2%。嗜麦芽葡萄球菌的抗生素谱在临床和环境样品中与妥布霉素、氨曲南、阿米卡星、头孢曲松、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑、头孢他啶、氯霉素和庆大霉素存在差异。结论:考虑到嗜麦芽链球菌的高耐药性和对所选抗生素的不同反应,氯霉素是最佳的治疗方案,其敏感性为81.8%。早期诊断和确定抗生素耐药模式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信