B. Chakravarty, R. Chattopadhyay, Kuladip Jana, P. Chakraborty
{"title":"Female Fertility Clock Closes to Tick around the Age of 43","authors":"B. Chakravarty, R. Chattopadhyay, Kuladip Jana, P. Chakraborty","doi":"10.18311/JER/2021/27816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate if attempting In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in women over 40 is of worth. Materials & Methods: Two hundred and thirty nine women over 40 years of age undergoing IVF were enrolled. Long protocol was used for downregulation followed by stimulation and IVF-ET. The primary outcome measure was live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of miscarriage, cycle cancellation, obstetrical complications, and maternal and fetal adverse events. Results: Clinical pregnancy rates per cycle were 42.85 %, 39.34 %, 34.09 %, 27.27 % and 16.66 % for 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44 years old, respectively. Absolute difference in live birth rate in age 40 - 44 vs control, -15 percentage points; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) -45 to 15.1, -18.77 percentage points; 95 % CI,(-56.31 to 18.79), -23.77 percentage points; 95 % CI,(-71.31 to 23.81), -25.82 percentage points; 95 % CI, (-77.48 to 25.84) and, - 27.72 percentage points; 95 % CI, (-83.16 to 27.76), respectively. Intra-uterine growth restriction and preterm delivery occurred significantly more frequently in the age group of 42 and above. Only one IVF cycle in patients aged 44 resulted in delivery. Conclusion: It appears that IVF treatment should be limited to patients not older than 43 years, with adequate ovarian response.","PeriodicalId":15664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology and Reproduction","volume":"1 1","pages":"79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology and Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/JER/2021/27816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate if attempting In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in women over 40 is of worth. Materials & Methods: Two hundred and thirty nine women over 40 years of age undergoing IVF were enrolled. Long protocol was used for downregulation followed by stimulation and IVF-ET. The primary outcome measure was live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of miscarriage, cycle cancellation, obstetrical complications, and maternal and fetal adverse events. Results: Clinical pregnancy rates per cycle were 42.85 %, 39.34 %, 34.09 %, 27.27 % and 16.66 % for 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44 years old, respectively. Absolute difference in live birth rate in age 40 - 44 vs control, -15 percentage points; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) -45 to 15.1, -18.77 percentage points; 95 % CI,(-56.31 to 18.79), -23.77 percentage points; 95 % CI,(-71.31 to 23.81), -25.82 percentage points; 95 % CI, (-77.48 to 25.84) and, - 27.72 percentage points; 95 % CI, (-83.16 to 27.76), respectively. Intra-uterine growth restriction and preterm delivery occurred significantly more frequently in the age group of 42 and above. Only one IVF cycle in patients aged 44 resulted in delivery. Conclusion: It appears that IVF treatment should be limited to patients not older than 43 years, with adequate ovarian response.