Interpreting Kierkegaard's Notion That "Truth Is Subjectivity"

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael Healy, R. Chervin
{"title":"Interpreting Kierkegaard's Notion That \"Truth Is Subjectivity\"","authors":"Michael Healy, R. Chervin","doi":"10.5840/QD2019923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Abstract:</p><p>The article interprets Kierkegaard's thesis that \"truth is subjectivity,\" unfolding four possible meanings: <list list-type=\"order\"><list-item><label>1</label><p>the deepest kinds of knowledge can only come from lived experience;</p></list-item><list-item><label>2</label><p>self-knowledge is essential for metanoia or change;</p></list-item><list-item><label>3</label><p>if the \"how\" is right, then the \"what\" or the truth will also be given; and</p></list-item><list-item><label>4</label><p>the deepest importance of truth lies in living it.</p></list-item></list></p><p>These reflections are then related to personalist themes: the incarnate person as responsible, as inviolable, and as averse to coercion; the incarnate person as having a mysterious interiority, an infinite abyss of existence, and as never reducible to a mere part of a whole nor simply determined from within or without; this interiority is not isolating but opens up toward others; and freedom is not arbitrary but implies universal moral and particular religious calls.</p><p>Finally, I ask whether Kierkegaard's personalism is too individualistic and does not do full justice to some of the themes here.</p>","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"32 1","pages":"31 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD2019923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:

The article interprets Kierkegaard's thesis that "truth is subjectivity," unfolding four possible meanings:

the deepest kinds of knowledge can only come from lived experience;

self-knowledge is essential for metanoia or change;

if the "how" is right, then the "what" or the truth will also be given; and

the deepest importance of truth lies in living it.

These reflections are then related to personalist themes: the incarnate person as responsible, as inviolable, and as averse to coercion; the incarnate person as having a mysterious interiority, an infinite abyss of existence, and as never reducible to a mere part of a whole nor simply determined from within or without; this interiority is not isolating but opens up toward others; and freedom is not arbitrary but implies universal moral and particular religious calls.

Finally, I ask whether Kierkegaard's personalism is too individualistic and does not do full justice to some of the themes here.

克尔凯郭尔“真理即主体性”思想解读
摘要:本文对克尔凯郭尔的“真理是主体性”这一命题进行了阐释,揭示了四种可能的含义:1、最深层次的知识只能来自于生活经验;2、自我认识是蜕变或变化的必要条件;3、如果“如何”是正确的,那么“是什么”或真理也将被给予;真理的最重要之处在于实践它。这些反思与个人主义主题相关:化身的人是负责任的,不可侵犯的,反对强迫的;化身的人有一个神秘的内在,一个存在的无限深渊,永远不能简化为一个整体的一部分,也不能简单地由内部或外部决定;这种内在不是孤立的,而是向他人开放的;自由不是武断的,而是意味着普遍的道德和特殊的宗教召唤。最后,我要问克尔凯郭尔的个人主义是否过于个人主义,是否没有完全公正地处理这里的一些主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信