Comparison of the push-out bond strength of different prefabricated fiber post systems: An in vitro study

Q3 Dentistry
Ayşe Karabaş, G. Avcu, N. Tatar
{"title":"Comparison of the push-out bond strength of different prefabricated fiber post systems: An in vitro study","authors":"Ayşe Karabaş, G. Avcu, N. Tatar","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_161_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of post type and hydrothermal aging on the push-out bond strength of four different fiber post systems. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human upper central incisors were treated with root canal treatment and divided into four different groups according to the treated post system (UniCore post [group U] [n = 20], Reforpost fiber [group R] [n = 20], Voco Rebilda post GT [group V] [n = 20], and EverStick post [group E] [n = 20]). The posts of teeth in all groups were divided into three parts from coronal, middle, and apical aspects. Half of the samples in all groups were subjected to hydrothermal aging (10,000 cycles). All subjects were applied to the crosshead speed push-out bond strength test at a 1-mm/min rate until being fractured. Fracture types were determined with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests statistically. Results: Bond strength values of EverStick post were significantly lower compared to the other groups (P < 0.01). In the presence/absence of hydrothermal aging, push-out bond strength in the coronal and middle regions was significantly higher compared to the apical region in all groups (P < 0.01). Bond strength values decreased in all groups following hydrothermal aging (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Push-out bond strength may be affected more negatively from coronal and middle of the tooth compared to its apical part. Hydrothermal aging may worsen the bond strength. The use of Reforpost fiber, VocoRebilda post GT, and UniCore posts may provide better bond strength compared to EverStick post.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"148 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_161_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of post type and hydrothermal aging on the push-out bond strength of four different fiber post systems. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human upper central incisors were treated with root canal treatment and divided into four different groups according to the treated post system (UniCore post [group U] [n = 20], Reforpost fiber [group R] [n = 20], Voco Rebilda post GT [group V] [n = 20], and EverStick post [group E] [n = 20]). The posts of teeth in all groups were divided into three parts from coronal, middle, and apical aspects. Half of the samples in all groups were subjected to hydrothermal aging (10,000 cycles). All subjects were applied to the crosshead speed push-out bond strength test at a 1-mm/min rate until being fractured. Fracture types were determined with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square tests statistically. Results: Bond strength values of EverStick post were significantly lower compared to the other groups (P < 0.01). In the presence/absence of hydrothermal aging, push-out bond strength in the coronal and middle regions was significantly higher compared to the apical region in all groups (P < 0.01). Bond strength values decreased in all groups following hydrothermal aging (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Push-out bond strength may be affected more negatively from coronal and middle of the tooth compared to its apical part. Hydrothermal aging may worsen the bond strength. The use of Reforpost fiber, VocoRebilda post GT, and UniCore posts may provide better bond strength compared to EverStick post.
不同预制纤维桩体系推出粘结强度的比较:体外研究
前言:本研究的目的是评价柱型和水热老化对四种不同纤维柱体系的推出粘结强度的影响。材料与方法:对80例拔除的人上颌中切牙进行根管治疗,根据处理后的桩体系分为4组(UniCore桩[U组][n = 20], Reforpost纤维桩[R组][n = 20], Voco Rebilda桩GT [V组][n = 20], EverStick桩[E组][n = 20])。各组牙柱分别从冠、中、尖三个方面进行划分。所有组中一半的样品进行水热老化(10,000次循环)。所有受试者均以1 mm/min的速率进行十字头速度推出粘结强度试验,直至断裂。用体视显微镜观察骨折类型。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果:evertick桩的粘结强度值明显低于其他各组(P < 0.01)。在有/无水热老化的情况下,各组冠状区和中部区的推出粘结强度均显著高于顶端区(P < 0.01)。水热老化后,各处理组的粘结强度值均降低(P < 0.01)。结论:冠状牙和中牙对牙体外推结合强度的影响大于尖牙。热液时效会使粘结强度下降。使用Reforpost纤维、VocoRebilda post GT和UniCore post可以提供比evertick post更好的粘合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信