Characterization of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures Among Workers from May 2020-June 2021

Carly D. Robinson, Shannon Gidley, Kara Garcia
{"title":"Characterization of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures Among Workers from May 2020-June 2021","authors":"Carly D. Robinson, Shannon Gidley, Kara Garcia","doi":"10.24926/jrmc.v6i3.5284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the relationship between early adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures (before vaccine availability) and later vaccination status (after vaccines were widely available) in the Southwest Indiana workforce population. \nDesign: Retrospective analysis of existing longitudinal cohort from two surveys: a COVID-19 prevalence survey in May 2020 and a follow up survey in June 2021. \nSetting: This study focused on secondary analysis of existing data from two surveys of the same Southwest Indiana workforce population, spanning manufacturing, finance, healthcare, and service industries. \nParticipants: The analysis included participants who completed the 2020 survey (845), 2021 survey (492), or both (343). \nMain Outcome Measures: Relationship of adherence to early mitigation measures on vaccine adoption. We also examined differences in demographic characteristics including age, rurality (rural, rural/mixed, or urban county based on zip code of residence), education level, gender, and workplace environment. \nResults: Significant differences in age (p=0.02) and education (p=0.01), but not rurality, were observed between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Furthermore, comparison of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups found significantly different responses to the degree of self-reported mitigation practices in early 2020. \nConclusions: Consistent with previous studies, we found that demographic characteristics such as age and education may influence vaccination status. Furthermore, our data suggest an association between willingness to practice mitigation measures at the beginning of the pandemic and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.  ","PeriodicalId":92811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of regional medical campuses","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of regional medical campuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/jrmc.v6i3.5284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the relationship between early adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures (before vaccine availability) and later vaccination status (after vaccines were widely available) in the Southwest Indiana workforce population. Design: Retrospective analysis of existing longitudinal cohort from two surveys: a COVID-19 prevalence survey in May 2020 and a follow up survey in June 2021. Setting: This study focused on secondary analysis of existing data from two surveys of the same Southwest Indiana workforce population, spanning manufacturing, finance, healthcare, and service industries. Participants: The analysis included participants who completed the 2020 survey (845), 2021 survey (492), or both (343). Main Outcome Measures: Relationship of adherence to early mitigation measures on vaccine adoption. We also examined differences in demographic characteristics including age, rurality (rural, rural/mixed, or urban county based on zip code of residence), education level, gender, and workplace environment. Results: Significant differences in age (p=0.02) and education (p=0.01), but not rurality, were observed between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Furthermore, comparison of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups found significantly different responses to the degree of self-reported mitigation practices in early 2020. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, we found that demographic characteristics such as age and education may influence vaccination status. Furthermore, our data suggest an association between willingness to practice mitigation measures at the beginning of the pandemic and willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.  
2020年5月至2021年6月工人COVID-19缓解措施的特征
目的:确定印第安纳州西南部劳动力人口早期遵守COVID-19缓解措施(在疫苗可用之前)与后来的疫苗接种状况(在疫苗广泛可用之后)之间的关系。设计:回顾性分析来自两项调查的现有纵向队列:2020年5月的COVID-19患病率调查和2021年6月的随访调查。背景:本研究侧重于对来自印第安纳州西南部相同劳动力人口的两次调查的现有数据的二次分析,涵盖制造业、金融、医疗保健和服务业。参与者:分析包括完成2020年调查(845),2021年调查(492)或两者(343)的参与者。主要结果测量:遵守早期缓解措施与疫苗采用的关系。我们还研究了人口统计学特征的差异,包括年龄、农村性(农村、农村/混合或城市县,基于居住地的邮政编码)、教育水平、性别和工作环境。结果:接种疫苗组与未接种疫苗组在年龄(p=0.02)和受教育程度(p=0.01)上存在显著差异,但农村性差异无统计学意义。此外,对接种疫苗组和未接种疫苗组的比较发现,2020年初对自我报告的缓解措施程度的反应存在显著差异。结论:与以往的研究一致,我们发现人口统计学特征,如年龄和教育程度可能影响疫苗接种状况。此外,我们的数据表明,在大流行开始时采取缓解措施的意愿与接种COVID-19疫苗的意愿之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信