Widows, Aids, Health and Human Rights in Africa

Susan von Struensee
{"title":"Widows, Aids, Health and Human Rights in Africa","authors":"Susan von Struensee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.569665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Widows - both child and adult in Tanzania, as in many other parts of the world, face discrimination on a regular basis. Such discrimination commonly destroys a woman's ability to live a life outside of poverty. In the face of the suffering and injustice widows endure throughout Africa, and elsewhere, there is no consensus on the importance of changing the customary legal rules relating to widows, and on the larger question of the proper place of customary law and harmful traditional, cultural, and religious practices in the changing African society. Yet practices which hitherto have been taken as settled and widely accepted are now being challenged in the face of the changing socioeconomic conditions in Africa, flagrant human rights violations, the health and human rights movement, and the AIDS epidemic. In many African countries social and legal structures are the result of three coexisting cultural layers: The traditional, the colonial, and the post colonial economic, social, and political structures, rendering unviable the current sustained blanket application of traditional cultural practices unrealistic and unjust to a majority of African women, whose voices are not yet fully represented in national policy debates today. Though family patterns, on which the traditions were based, have drastically changed, customary laws of the past are still applied. While some may argue that the forced entry of African traditional societies into the capitalist economy has been imposed by colonial imperialists, the fact is these changes exist, Africa has been transformed and adaptation is necessary, and an idealization of the traditional past with an extended family that no longer exists in its traditional form is not helpful to creating the responsive institutions for Africa today. The extended family is not a static unit, but a dynamic entity customized by persons to fit their purposes. Customary laws and practices, if ever appropriate can no longer be justified in Africa under the guise of protecting the extended family, even if customary laws and practices were ever reasonable and justifiable in the past. A rejection of the customary rules of inheritance today by the growing women's movement in the continent stems from their inability to deal with changing circumstances in Africa. The impact of colonialism, urbanization, globalization, and the emergence of modern states in the continent have produced irreversible social, cultural, and economic changes in the continent which cannot be readily ignored. Welshman Ncube argues there is no fidelity in reasserting customary laws which are oppressive and politically fabricated for advantage and not even actually based on kinship or the public good. Rather, the concern should be to remake our laws in such a way that they are fair, just and reasonable. African widows have no choices other than those perpetuating the domination of widows by male relatives, e.g., choices to accept her husband's brother as a husband, residing with married children who may mistreat them or accepting horrific treatment of widows. The amendment of discriminatory customary laws and practices is demanded in accordance with evolving international human rights standards on equality and non-discrimination. Tanzanian women face such discrimination on a daily basis. The extent of the discriminatory practices in place in Tanzania is evidenced by the current laws on women's intestate succession (i.e., inheritance) rights. The current Tanzanian laws relating to inheritance rights illustrate women's inequality in the ownership of property, and illustrate persistently unequal conditions of women's lives. Widows and female children in Tanzania traditionally have had little right to inherit property from their husbands' estates even when the property was acquired during the marriage. This issue is further complicated by a three-part legal system consisting of customary, religious, i.e., Islamic law, and statutory law. The uncertainty and confusion surrounding this three-part system compounds existing exploitative practices in inheritance, such as widow inheritance, widow sexual cleansing, and property grabbing. As a result, Tanzanian women and their children, more often than not, are left destitute and homeless upon the death of their spouses. Despite Tanzania's commitment to secure equality for women under its own constitution and under international law, these conditions persist. Tanzania has also signed and ratified a number of international treatises in its efforts, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the African Charter on Human and People's Rights. Notwithstanding the legal obligations it has pledged itself to, Tanzania has not eradicated discrimination against women; despite its obligation based on its own law and international commitments to guarantee women's equality in all aspects of life, including the law relating to intestate succession, and to eliminate laws, cultural practices, and beliefs that act as legal barriers to that equality. Inheritance rights are a critical issue for women because traditionally in many African countries, rather than offer protection to widows, common law, customary law, and statutory laws in the country perpetuate the discrimination against them. The experiences of African widows range from disinheritance and forceful deprivation of property to the mandatory observance of harmful rituals. While important in its own right, the issue of inheritance rights also illustrates more broadly women's inequality in the ownership of property and in marriage and provides a window into the persistently unequal conditions of women's lives throughout Africa. Finally, the issue of women's inheritance rights provides an opportunity to assess the efficacy of legislation in guaranteeing women's rights and changing longstanding social practices.","PeriodicalId":73765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health care law & policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health care law & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.569665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Widows - both child and adult in Tanzania, as in many other parts of the world, face discrimination on a regular basis. Such discrimination commonly destroys a woman's ability to live a life outside of poverty. In the face of the suffering and injustice widows endure throughout Africa, and elsewhere, there is no consensus on the importance of changing the customary legal rules relating to widows, and on the larger question of the proper place of customary law and harmful traditional, cultural, and religious practices in the changing African society. Yet practices which hitherto have been taken as settled and widely accepted are now being challenged in the face of the changing socioeconomic conditions in Africa, flagrant human rights violations, the health and human rights movement, and the AIDS epidemic. In many African countries social and legal structures are the result of three coexisting cultural layers: The traditional, the colonial, and the post colonial economic, social, and political structures, rendering unviable the current sustained blanket application of traditional cultural practices unrealistic and unjust to a majority of African women, whose voices are not yet fully represented in national policy debates today. Though family patterns, on which the traditions were based, have drastically changed, customary laws of the past are still applied. While some may argue that the forced entry of African traditional societies into the capitalist economy has been imposed by colonial imperialists, the fact is these changes exist, Africa has been transformed and adaptation is necessary, and an idealization of the traditional past with an extended family that no longer exists in its traditional form is not helpful to creating the responsive institutions for Africa today. The extended family is not a static unit, but a dynamic entity customized by persons to fit their purposes. Customary laws and practices, if ever appropriate can no longer be justified in Africa under the guise of protecting the extended family, even if customary laws and practices were ever reasonable and justifiable in the past. A rejection of the customary rules of inheritance today by the growing women's movement in the continent stems from their inability to deal with changing circumstances in Africa. The impact of colonialism, urbanization, globalization, and the emergence of modern states in the continent have produced irreversible social, cultural, and economic changes in the continent which cannot be readily ignored. Welshman Ncube argues there is no fidelity in reasserting customary laws which are oppressive and politically fabricated for advantage and not even actually based on kinship or the public good. Rather, the concern should be to remake our laws in such a way that they are fair, just and reasonable. African widows have no choices other than those perpetuating the domination of widows by male relatives, e.g., choices to accept her husband's brother as a husband, residing with married children who may mistreat them or accepting horrific treatment of widows. The amendment of discriminatory customary laws and practices is demanded in accordance with evolving international human rights standards on equality and non-discrimination. Tanzanian women face such discrimination on a daily basis. The extent of the discriminatory practices in place in Tanzania is evidenced by the current laws on women's intestate succession (i.e., inheritance) rights. The current Tanzanian laws relating to inheritance rights illustrate women's inequality in the ownership of property, and illustrate persistently unequal conditions of women's lives. Widows and female children in Tanzania traditionally have had little right to inherit property from their husbands' estates even when the property was acquired during the marriage. This issue is further complicated by a three-part legal system consisting of customary, religious, i.e., Islamic law, and statutory law. The uncertainty and confusion surrounding this three-part system compounds existing exploitative practices in inheritance, such as widow inheritance, widow sexual cleansing, and property grabbing. As a result, Tanzanian women and their children, more often than not, are left destitute and homeless upon the death of their spouses. Despite Tanzania's commitment to secure equality for women under its own constitution and under international law, these conditions persist. Tanzania has also signed and ratified a number of international treatises in its efforts, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the African Charter on Human and People's Rights. Notwithstanding the legal obligations it has pledged itself to, Tanzania has not eradicated discrimination against women; despite its obligation based on its own law and international commitments to guarantee women's equality in all aspects of life, including the law relating to intestate succession, and to eliminate laws, cultural practices, and beliefs that act as legal barriers to that equality. Inheritance rights are a critical issue for women because traditionally in many African countries, rather than offer protection to widows, common law, customary law, and statutory laws in the country perpetuate the discrimination against them. The experiences of African widows range from disinheritance and forceful deprivation of property to the mandatory observance of harmful rituals. While important in its own right, the issue of inheritance rights also illustrates more broadly women's inequality in the ownership of property and in marriage and provides a window into the persistently unequal conditions of women's lives throughout Africa. Finally, the issue of women's inheritance rights provides an opportunity to assess the efficacy of legislation in guaranteeing women's rights and changing longstanding social practices.
非洲的寡妇、艾滋病、健康和人权
与世界上许多其他地区一样,坦桑尼亚的寡妇——无论是儿童还是成人——经常受到歧视。这种歧视通常会破坏妇女摆脱贫困生活的能力。面对整个非洲和其他地方的寡妇所遭受的苦难和不公正,对于改变与寡妇有关的习惯法规则的重要性,以及在不断变化的非洲社会中习惯法和有害的传统、文化和宗教习俗的适当地位这一更大的问题,人们没有达成共识。然而,面对非洲不断变化的社会经济条件、公然侵犯人权、保健和人权运动以及艾滋病流行,迄今被视为已确定和广泛接受的做法现在正受到挑战。在许多非洲国家,社会和法律结构是三个共存的文化层次的结果:传统的、殖民的和后殖民的经济、社会和政治结构,这使得目前持续的传统文化习俗的全面应用对大多数非洲妇女来说是不现实和不公正的,她们的声音在今天的国家政策辩论中尚未得到充分体现。虽然作为传统基础的家庭模式已经发生了巨大的变化,但过去的习惯法仍然适用。虽然有些人可能会争辩说,非洲传统社会被迫进入资本主义经济是由殖民帝国主义者强加的,但事实是这些变化是存在的,非洲已经改变了,适应是必要的,对传统过去的理想化,即不再以其传统形式存在的大家庭,无助于为今天的非洲建立反应迅速的机构。大家庭不是一个静态的单位,而是人们为满足自己的目的而定制的动态实体。在非洲,即使习惯法律和做法在过去曾经是合理和正当的,也不能再在保护大家庭的幌子下为其辩护。非洲大陆日益壮大的妇女运动今天拒绝传统的继承规则,这是由于她们无法应付非洲不断变化的情况。殖民主义、城市化、全球化和现代国家的出现对非洲大陆的影响产生了不可逆转的社会、文化和经济变化,这些变化不容忽视。威尔士曼·恩库贝认为,重申习惯法是不忠诚的,习惯法是压迫性的,是政治上为了利益而捏造的,甚至不是基于亲属关系或公共利益。相反,我们应该关注的是如何重新制定我们的法律,使其公平、公正和合理。非洲寡妇没有别的选择,只能使男性亲属对寡妇的统治持续下去,例如,选择在丈夫去世后接受丈夫的兄弟作为丈夫,由兄弟“继承”她,与可能虐待她们的已婚子女同住,或接受对寡妇的可怕待遇。要求根据关于平等和不歧视的国际人权标准,修正歧视性的习惯法和做法。坦桑尼亚妇女每天都面临这种歧视。关于妇女无遗嘱继承(即继承)权利的现行法律证明了坦桑尼亚现行歧视性做法的严重程度。坦桑尼亚目前有关继承权的法律说明妇女在财产所有权方面的不平等,并说明妇女的生活状况一直不平等。传统上,坦桑尼亚的寡妇和女童几乎没有权利从丈夫的遗产中继承财产,即使这些财产是在婚姻期间获得的。习惯法、宗教法(即伊斯兰法)和成文法三部分组成的法律体系使这个问题进一步复杂化。这一由三部分组成的制度的不确定性和混乱加剧了现有的遗产剥削做法,如寡妇由亡夫的兄弟继承遗产、寡妇的性清洗和财产掠夺。因此,坦桑尼亚妇女及其子女往往在配偶死亡后陷入赤贫和无家可归的境地。尽管坦桑尼亚承诺根据本国宪法和国际法确保妇女平等,但这些情况仍然存在。坦桑尼亚在其努力中还签署和批准了若干国际文书,包括《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》、《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》、《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》、《儿童权利公约》和《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信