Between Home and School: Organized Parents, Clubwomen, and Urban Education in the Progressive Era

William J. Reese
{"title":"Between Home and School: Organized Parents, Clubwomen, and Urban Education in the Progressive Era","authors":"William J. Reese","doi":"10.1086/443450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major concern of professional educators and urban lay people in the Progressive Era was how to define the precise relationships of parents and the public schools. Certainly the problem was not unique to the early twentieth century, since educators from the time of Horace Mann to that of John Dewey were distressed by the alienation and conflict which had historically divided home and school. While theorists agreed that teachers and parents should work in harmony for the educational welfare of the child, both sides were often veritable adversaries, suspicious of each other's motives and influence. If the problem was not unique, however, the organizational response that it generated became a striking social phenomenon in the early twentieth century.' Beginning in the early 1890s, numerous parent organizations, usually dominated by women, were preoccupied with the issue of home and school relationships on the local level. Like many educators today, urban parents and clubwomen tried to isolate the precise areas where home and school responsibilities began, overlapped, and ended. The activities of these coalitions of voluntary associations demonstrated that lay people could play a creative role in public education. By actively supporting innovative educational programs and social services in the schools, they helped break down the isolation of institutions whose increasingly professionalized and centralized nature threatened to drive them far away from the life of the average citizen. Vacation schools, playgrounds, social centers, school lunches, domes-","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"20 1","pages":"3 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

A major concern of professional educators and urban lay people in the Progressive Era was how to define the precise relationships of parents and the public schools. Certainly the problem was not unique to the early twentieth century, since educators from the time of Horace Mann to that of John Dewey were distressed by the alienation and conflict which had historically divided home and school. While theorists agreed that teachers and parents should work in harmony for the educational welfare of the child, both sides were often veritable adversaries, suspicious of each other's motives and influence. If the problem was not unique, however, the organizational response that it generated became a striking social phenomenon in the early twentieth century.' Beginning in the early 1890s, numerous parent organizations, usually dominated by women, were preoccupied with the issue of home and school relationships on the local level. Like many educators today, urban parents and clubwomen tried to isolate the precise areas where home and school responsibilities began, overlapped, and ended. The activities of these coalitions of voluntary associations demonstrated that lay people could play a creative role in public education. By actively supporting innovative educational programs and social services in the schools, they helped break down the isolation of institutions whose increasingly professionalized and centralized nature threatened to drive them far away from the life of the average citizen. Vacation schools, playgrounds, social centers, school lunches, domes-
在家庭与学校之间:进步时代有组织的家长、俱乐部女性和城市教育
在进步时代,专业教育工作者和城市外行人主要关心的是如何定义家长和公立学校的确切关系。当然,这个问题并不是20世纪初所独有的,因为从霍勒斯·曼(Horace Mann)时代到约翰·杜威(John Dewey)时代的教育家都为历史上把家庭和学校分开的异化和冲突感到苦恼。虽然理论家们同意教师和家长应该为孩子的教育福利和谐合作,但双方往往是真正的对手,怀疑彼此的动机和影响。然而,如果这个问题不是独一无二的,那么它所产生的组织反应在20世纪初成为一种引人注目的社会现象。”从19世纪90年代初开始,许多家长组织(通常以女性为主)开始关注地方层面的家庭和学校关系问题。像今天的许多教育工作者一样,城市父母和俱乐部女性试图将家庭和学校责任开始、重叠和结束的精确区域隔离开来。这些自愿协会联盟的活动表明,非专业人士可以在公共教育中发挥创造性作用。通过积极支持学校的创新教育项目和社会服务,他们帮助打破了机构的孤立,这些机构日益专业化和集中化的性质威胁着它们远离普通公民的生活。度假学校,操场,社交中心,学校午餐,圆顶
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书