Multi‐mode standardization under extreme time‐pressure – the case of COVID‐19 contact‐tracing apps

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
R&D Management Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1111/radm.12508
K. Marhold, Jan Fell
{"title":"Multi‐mode standardization under extreme time‐pressure – the case of COVID‐19 contact‐tracing apps","authors":"K. Marhold, Jan Fell","doi":"10.1111/radm.12508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigates the standardization process of contact tracing apps during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Due to the epidemiological urgency, and differing from classical examples in the literature, this process is characterized by a compressed timeframe. In this setting, we investigate the role of different standard‐setting modes and their interaction through the lens of multi‐mode standardization. We find that the processes of standard setting through market competition or inclusive multi‐stakeholder committees proved time‐consuming and inefficient in addressing the immediate needs during this major global health crisis. Multi‐mode standardization between committees, market players, and governments equally proved unable to coordinate a standard. Ultimately, a so far neglected actor, namely platform owners, proved to be pivotal in coordinating a widely‐adopted standard. Our research extends multi‐mode standardization with platform owners as a further standardization actor of proliferating importance given the increasing pervasiveness of platforms in numerous contexts. The present article provides implications for the interplay between different modes of standard setting in general, and the setting of technological standards in crises in particular.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"356 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study investigates the standardization process of contact tracing apps during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Due to the epidemiological urgency, and differing from classical examples in the literature, this process is characterized by a compressed timeframe. In this setting, we investigate the role of different standard‐setting modes and their interaction through the lens of multi‐mode standardization. We find that the processes of standard setting through market competition or inclusive multi‐stakeholder committees proved time‐consuming and inefficient in addressing the immediate needs during this major global health crisis. Multi‐mode standardization between committees, market players, and governments equally proved unable to coordinate a standard. Ultimately, a so far neglected actor, namely platform owners, proved to be pivotal in coordinating a widely‐adopted standard. Our research extends multi‐mode standardization with platform owners as a further standardization actor of proliferating importance given the increasing pervasiveness of platforms in numerous contexts. The present article provides implications for the interplay between different modes of standard setting in general, and the setting of technological standards in crises in particular.
极端时间压力下的多模式标准化——以COVID - 19接触者追踪应用为例
本研究调查了COVID - 19大流行期间接触者追踪应用程序的标准化过程。由于流行病学的紧迫性,并且与文献中的经典例子不同,这一过程的特点是时间紧迫。在这种情况下,我们通过多模式标准化的视角研究了不同标准制定模式的作用及其相互作用。我们发现,在解决这一重大全球卫生危机期间的迫切需求方面,通过市场竞争或包容性多利益攸关方委员会制定标准的过程既耗时又低效。委员会、市场参与者和政府之间的多模式标准化同样被证明无法协调一个标准。最终,一个一直被忽视的角色,即平台所有者,在协调广泛采用的标准方面发挥了关键作用。我们的研究扩展了多模式标准化,平台所有者作为一个进一步的标准化参与者,鉴于平台在众多环境中的日益普及,其重要性日益增加。本文为标准制定的不同模式之间的相互作用提供了启示,特别是在危机中制定技术标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信