Do the effects of student engagement on the development of generic skills differ across nations?

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
N. Maloshonok, I. Shcheglova
{"title":"Do the effects of student engagement on the development of generic skills differ across nations?","authors":"N. Maloshonok, I. Shcheglova","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2021.1992641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The student engagement framework, originally developed for the US educational system, has become increasingly recognised internationally as a means of fostering learning gains in higher education. Despite its recognition, some researchers raise a question about the applicability of this framework in other cultural contexts. Our research extends the existing literature on student engagement by filling the gap of knowledge about the cross-cultural applicability of the student engagement framework. Utilising multi-group structural equation modelling, this paper answers the question about the national differences in associations between student engagement dimensions and the development of generic skills. Data collected from 21 universities across the U.S.A., China, Japan, and Russia, were used. Relying on student engagement literature, four student engagement dimensions were constructed: (1) class engagement, (2) extra effort to meet course objectives or own learning tasks, (3) disengagement, and (4) collaborative learning. The findings support multi-group invariance of the associations between student engagement dimensions and the perceived gains in generic skills across all participating countries. Regardless of country specifics, the extra effort and collaborative learning significantly contribute to the development of generic skills while disengagement has a negative effect.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"80 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1992641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The student engagement framework, originally developed for the US educational system, has become increasingly recognised internationally as a means of fostering learning gains in higher education. Despite its recognition, some researchers raise a question about the applicability of this framework in other cultural contexts. Our research extends the existing literature on student engagement by filling the gap of knowledge about the cross-cultural applicability of the student engagement framework. Utilising multi-group structural equation modelling, this paper answers the question about the national differences in associations between student engagement dimensions and the development of generic skills. Data collected from 21 universities across the U.S.A., China, Japan, and Russia, were used. Relying on student engagement literature, four student engagement dimensions were constructed: (1) class engagement, (2) extra effort to meet course objectives or own learning tasks, (3) disengagement, and (4) collaborative learning. The findings support multi-group invariance of the associations between student engagement dimensions and the perceived gains in generic skills across all participating countries. Regardless of country specifics, the extra effort and collaborative learning significantly contribute to the development of generic skills while disengagement has a negative effect.
学生参与对通用技能发展的影响是否因国家而异?
学生参与框架最初是为美国教育系统开发的,作为促进高等教育学习成果的一种手段,已在国际上得到越来越多的认可。尽管它得到了认可,但一些研究人员对这一框架在其他文化背景下的适用性提出了质疑。我们的研究通过填补关于学生投入框架跨文化适用性的知识空白,扩展了现有的关于学生投入的文献。利用多群体结构方程模型,本文回答了关于学生参与维度与通用技能发展之间关联的国家差异的问题。数据收集自美国、中国、日本和俄罗斯的21所大学。基于学生敬业度文献,我们构建了四个学生敬业度维度:(1)课堂敬业度,(2)为完成课程目标或自己的学习任务所付出的额外努力,(3)脱离敬业度,(4)协作学习。研究结果支持在所有参与国家中,学生参与维度与通用技能感知收益之间的关联存在多组不变性。无论国家具体情况如何,额外的努力和协作学习对一般技能的发展都有重大贡献,而脱离接触则会产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信