ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS NO BRASIL: CONSTRUINDO ACESSO OU REPLICANDO EXCLUSÃO?

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
A. Carrieri, Gabriel Farias Alves Correia
{"title":"ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS NO BRASIL: CONSTRUINDO ACESSO OU REPLICANDO EXCLUSÃO?","authors":"A. Carrieri, Gabriel Farias Alves Correia","doi":"10.1590/s0034-759020200107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on teaching and research in Organizational Studies (OS) in the Brazilian context. The notes worked on here are just a few among many, reinforcing the plurality of views, perspectives, and epistemological foundations that comprise the field. In this sense, we are not looking for a definition of what teaching and research are or should be; rather, we are moving towards a diverse construction of reflexive directions in the hope that these processes can become more inclusive in the face of the unequal Brazilian reality.","PeriodicalId":46558,"journal":{"name":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020200107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This article reflects on teaching and research in Organizational Studies (OS) in the Brazilian context. The notes worked on here are just a few among many, reinforcing the plurality of views, perspectives, and epistemological foundations that comprise the field. In this sense, we are not looking for a definition of what teaching and research are or should be; rather, we are moving towards a diverse construction of reflexive directions in the hope that these processes can become more inclusive in the face of the unequal Brazilian reality.
巴西的组织研究:建立准入还是复制排斥?
本文对组织学在巴西的教学与研究进行了反思。这里所做的笔记只是众多笔记中的一小部分,它们强化了构成该领域的观点、视角和认识论基础的多样性。从这个意义上说,我们不是在寻找教学和研究是什么或应该是什么的定义;相反,我们正朝着反身性方向的多样化构建迈进,希望这些进程能够在巴西不平等的现实面前变得更具包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
78
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信