Feasibility of comics in health communication: Public responses to graphic medicine on Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic

Xin Zhao, A. Feigenbaum, Shannon McDavitt
{"title":"Feasibility of comics in health communication: Public responses to graphic medicine on Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Xin Zhao, A. Feigenbaum, Shannon McDavitt","doi":"10.1386/jvpc_00015_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has called for effective health communication strategies to better protect the public’s well-being, particularly over social media. Among various strategies, health-related comics, referred to as ‘graphic medicine’, were circulated on social media to communicate public health information and to share individuals’ struggles with mental health. Despite a growing body of research in the field of graphic medicine, studies on public responses to graphic medicine are rare, leaving a gap in understanding the feasibility of these comics for effective health communication over social media. To address this gap, this study focused on Instagram audience responses to graphic medicine posts related to the COVID-19 pandemic that were circulated on the platform. It used qualitative content analysis to study 334 comments on eleven comics related to mental health and 159 comments on ten comics related to vaccination. Findings evidence the feasibility of graphic medicine as a tool for health communication relating to showing empathy, contributing personal experiences and knowledge and understanding and elaborating on health-related knowledge, what we refer to as ‘health literacy’. Empirical implications of health communication through graphic medicine are discussed alongside the similarities and differences found in the comments relating to these two distinct COVID-19 issues.","PeriodicalId":93592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visual political communication","volume":"350 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of visual political communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00015_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has called for effective health communication strategies to better protect the public’s well-being, particularly over social media. Among various strategies, health-related comics, referred to as ‘graphic medicine’, were circulated on social media to communicate public health information and to share individuals’ struggles with mental health. Despite a growing body of research in the field of graphic medicine, studies on public responses to graphic medicine are rare, leaving a gap in understanding the feasibility of these comics for effective health communication over social media. To address this gap, this study focused on Instagram audience responses to graphic medicine posts related to the COVID-19 pandemic that were circulated on the platform. It used qualitative content analysis to study 334 comments on eleven comics related to mental health and 159 comments on ten comics related to vaccination. Findings evidence the feasibility of graphic medicine as a tool for health communication relating to showing empathy, contributing personal experiences and knowledge and understanding and elaborating on health-related knowledge, what we refer to as ‘health literacy’. Empirical implications of health communication through graphic medicine are discussed alongside the similarities and differences found in the comments relating to these two distinct COVID-19 issues.
漫画在健康传播中的可行性:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,公众对Instagram上图文医学的反应
COVID-19大流行要求采取有效的卫生传播战略,以更好地保护公众的福祉,特别是通过社交媒体。在各种策略中,与健康有关的漫画,被称为“图形医学”,在社交媒体上传播,以传达公共卫生信息,并分享个人与心理健康的斗争。尽管在图形医学领域的研究越来越多,但关于公众对图形医学的反应的研究很少,在理解这些漫画在社交媒体上进行有效健康传播的可行性方面留下了空白。为了解决这一差距,本研究重点关注Instagram用户对该平台上传播的与COVID-19大流行相关的图片医学帖子的反应。采用定性内容分析的方法,对11部与心理健康相关的漫画的334条评论和10部与疫苗接种相关的漫画的159条评论进行了研究。研究结果证明,图形医学作为一种健康交流工具的可行性,与表达同情、贡献个人经验和知识、理解和阐述与健康有关的知识有关,我们称之为“健康素养”。本文讨论了通过图形医学进行健康传播的经验意义,以及与这两个不同的COVID-19问题相关的评论中发现的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信