Patients' perspectives on improvement of medically unexplained physical symptoms: a qualitative analysis

N. V. Dessel, F. R. Velzeboer, J. C. Wouden, C. Boer, J. Dekker, H. Horst
{"title":"Patients' perspectives on improvement of medically unexplained physical symptoms: a qualitative analysis","authors":"N. V. Dessel, F. R. Velzeboer, J. C. Wouden, C. Boer, J. Dekker, H. Horst","doi":"10.25149/1756-8358.1102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title: Patients’ perspectives on improvement of Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: a qualitative analysis. \nBackground: Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are common. Knowledge of Knowledge on factors contributing to improvement of MUPS may be useful for the development of more effective treatments. This study aims to assess the factors contributing to improvement of symptoms, according to recently improved MUPS patients. \nMethods: This qualitative study is part of a prospective cohort study on the course of MUPS. We selected patients with at least moderate MUPS at baseline and with a substantial decrease of symptoms after 6 or 12 months. We performed semi-structured interviews. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed in ATLAS.ti. \nFindings: Although saturation of data was reached after 6 interviews, 9 patients were interviewed. Their symptoms had developed gradually and worsened until a certain point of crisis. Before this crisis patients were focused on finding symptom causes and on becoming one’s old self again. The experience of a crisis made them accept their situation. This resulted in a search for improvement instead of recovery. Participants started taking control of their own well-being by coping differently (e.g. by pacing activities and relaxing effectively), mostly supported by a therapist. This led to symptom improvement. Participants deemed it important that General Practitioners and therapists were coaching and took their problem seriously. Received therapies varied from regular therapies to complementary therapies. The latter were experienced as effective, as they combined psychological and physical components. Some participants missed this multidimensional approach in regular treatments. \nConclusions: Acceptance of symptoms and their consequences seems to be the most important condition for improvement of MUPS. As a moment of personal crisis forms the most important motivation for acceptance, it may be something that cannot be forced by therapists. Nevertheless, General Practitioners and therapists can support patients on their way to acceptance. A wish for multidimensional treatments in regular health care was identified.","PeriodicalId":89603,"journal":{"name":"Mental health in family medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health in family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25149/1756-8358.1102007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Title: Patients’ perspectives on improvement of Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: a qualitative analysis. Background: Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are common. Knowledge of Knowledge on factors contributing to improvement of MUPS may be useful for the development of more effective treatments. This study aims to assess the factors contributing to improvement of symptoms, according to recently improved MUPS patients. Methods: This qualitative study is part of a prospective cohort study on the course of MUPS. We selected patients with at least moderate MUPS at baseline and with a substantial decrease of symptoms after 6 or 12 months. We performed semi-structured interviews. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed in ATLAS.ti. Findings: Although saturation of data was reached after 6 interviews, 9 patients were interviewed. Their symptoms had developed gradually and worsened until a certain point of crisis. Before this crisis patients were focused on finding symptom causes and on becoming one’s old self again. The experience of a crisis made them accept their situation. This resulted in a search for improvement instead of recovery. Participants started taking control of their own well-being by coping differently (e.g. by pacing activities and relaxing effectively), mostly supported by a therapist. This led to symptom improvement. Participants deemed it important that General Practitioners and therapists were coaching and took their problem seriously. Received therapies varied from regular therapies to complementary therapies. The latter were experienced as effective, as they combined psychological and physical components. Some participants missed this multidimensional approach in regular treatments. Conclusions: Acceptance of symptoms and their consequences seems to be the most important condition for improvement of MUPS. As a moment of personal crisis forms the most important motivation for acceptance, it may be something that cannot be forced by therapists. Nevertheless, General Practitioners and therapists can support patients on their way to acceptance. A wish for multidimensional treatments in regular health care was identified.
患者对医学上无法解释的躯体症状改善的看法:一项定性分析
题目:病人对医学上无法解释的躯体症状改善的看法:一项定性分析。背景:医学上无法解释的躯体症状(MUPS)很常见。了解有助于改善MUPS的因素可能有助于开发更有效的治疗方法。这项研究的目的是评估有助于改善症状的因素,根据最近改善的MUPS患者。方法:本定性研究是前瞻性队列研究MUPS病程的一部分。我们选择了在基线时至少有中度MUPS且在6或12个月后症状明显减轻的患者。我们进行了半结构化的访谈。录音逐字转录并在ATLAS.ti中进行分析。结果:虽然6次访谈达到数据饱和,但仍有9例患者接受了访谈。他们的症状是逐渐发展和恶化的,直到某个危机点。在这次危机之前,病人们专注于寻找症状的原因,并重新成为原来的自己。危机的经历使他们接受了自己的处境。这导致了寻求改善而不是恢复。参与者开始通过不同的应对方式来控制自己的健康(例如,通过调整活动节奏和有效放松),主要是在治疗师的支持下。这导致了症状的改善。参与者认为全科医生和治疗师进行指导并认真对待他们的问题是很重要的。接受的治疗方法从常规治疗到补充治疗不等。后者被认为是有效的,因为它们结合了心理和生理因素。一些参与者在常规治疗中错过了这种多维方法。结论:接受症状及其后果似乎是改善MUPS的最重要条件。由于个人危机的时刻形成了接受的最重要动机,这可能是治疗师无法强迫的。然而,全科医生和治疗师可以支持病人接受。人们希望在常规保健中提供多层面治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书