Digitalization and money laundering: the moderating effects of ethical behaviour of firms and corruption

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Imen Khelil, Anis El Ammari, Mohamed Amine Bouraoui, Hichem Khlif
{"title":"Digitalization and money laundering: the moderating effects of ethical behaviour of firms and corruption","authors":"Imen Khelil, Anis El Ammari, Mohamed Amine Bouraoui, Hichem Khlif","doi":"10.1108/jmlc-01-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the relationship between digitalization and money laundering and tests whether ethical behaviour of firms and corruption moderate this association.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe sample includes 114 countries during 2016. Basel Anti-Money Laundering Report for 2016 is used to collect data concerning money laundering. Digitalization proxies are collected from digital adoption index from the World Bank for 2016. Finally, the remaining variables are gathered from the Global Competitiveness Report for the same year.\n\n\nFindings\nResults show negative and significant associations between the overall digitalization score and sub-scores dealing with digitalization adoption by businesses, people and government and money laundering. When testing for the moderating effect of corruption, the negative and significant association remains stable for both low and high corrupt environments for the overall digitalization score and sub-scores dealing digitalization adoption by businesses and people and money laundering. Similarly, ethical behaviour of firms does not moderate the association between digitalization (overall index and digitalization by business and people) and money laundering, as the relationship remains negative and significant for low and high ethical behaviour sub-samples. By contrast, the association becomes insignificant between digitalization adoption by government and money laundering for countries characterized by high corruption and low ethical behaviour of firms, while it is negative and significant for countries characterized by low corruption and high ethical behaviour firms.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese findings confirm that digitalization effort represents a crucial arm to combat money laundering. It also emphasizes the interrelation that may exist between digitalization effort in governmental institutions and institutional environment, as low levels of money laundering cannot be reached if the digitalization effort undertaken by governments is not supported by low corruption and ethical business environment.\n","PeriodicalId":46042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-01-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the relationship between digitalization and money laundering and tests whether ethical behaviour of firms and corruption moderate this association. Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 114 countries during 2016. Basel Anti-Money Laundering Report for 2016 is used to collect data concerning money laundering. Digitalization proxies are collected from digital adoption index from the World Bank for 2016. Finally, the remaining variables are gathered from the Global Competitiveness Report for the same year. Findings Results show negative and significant associations between the overall digitalization score and sub-scores dealing with digitalization adoption by businesses, people and government and money laundering. When testing for the moderating effect of corruption, the negative and significant association remains stable for both low and high corrupt environments for the overall digitalization score and sub-scores dealing digitalization adoption by businesses and people and money laundering. Similarly, ethical behaviour of firms does not moderate the association between digitalization (overall index and digitalization by business and people) and money laundering, as the relationship remains negative and significant for low and high ethical behaviour sub-samples. By contrast, the association becomes insignificant between digitalization adoption by government and money laundering for countries characterized by high corruption and low ethical behaviour of firms, while it is negative and significant for countries characterized by low corruption and high ethical behaviour firms. Originality/value These findings confirm that digitalization effort represents a crucial arm to combat money laundering. It also emphasizes the interrelation that may exist between digitalization effort in governmental institutions and institutional environment, as low levels of money laundering cannot be reached if the digitalization effort undertaken by governments is not supported by low corruption and ethical business environment.
数字化与洗钱:企业道德行为与腐败的调节作用
本文旨在研究数字化与洗钱之间的关系,并检验企业的道德行为和腐败是否会缓和这种联系。设计/方法/方法样本包括2016年的114个国家。《2016年巴塞尔反洗钱报告》用于收集有关洗钱的数据。数字化代理数据来自世界银行2016年的数字化采用指数。最后,剩下的变量来自同年的《全球竞争力报告》。研究结果显示,总体数字化得分与涉及企业、个人和政府采用数字化以及洗钱的子得分之间存在显著负相关。在对腐败的调节效应进行测试时,无论是在低腐败环境还是在高腐败环境中,总体数字化得分以及涉及企业和个人采用数字化和洗钱的子得分都保持稳定的负相关和显著关联。同样,企业的道德行为并不能调节数字化(总体指数和企业和人员的数字化)与洗钱之间的关联,因为在低道德行为和高道德行为子样本中,这种关系仍然是负相关的,并且显著。相比之下,在腐败程度高、企业道德行为低的国家,政府采用数字化与洗钱之间的关联变得不显著,而在腐败程度低、企业道德行为高的国家,这种关联则是显著的。这些发现证实,数字化工作是打击洗钱的重要手段。它还强调了政府机构的数字化努力与制度环境之间可能存在的相互关系,因为如果政府开展的数字化努力没有低腐败和道德商业环境的支持,就无法达到低水平的洗钱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Journal of Money Laundering Control CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
59
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信