Influence of Superplasticizer Type on the Compresive Strength of Reactive Powder Mortars

L. Coppola, R. Troli, A. Borsoi, P. Zaffaroni, M. Collepardi
{"title":"Influence of Superplasticizer Type on the Compresive Strength of Reactive Powder Mortars","authors":"L. Coppola, R. Troli, A. Borsoi, P. Zaffaroni, M. Collepardi","doi":"10.14359/6201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reactive powder mortar (RPM) mixtures cured at room temperature with different portland cement, silica fume and steel fibers were manufactured. The influence of the superplasticizer type on the ROM performance - in terms of w/c and compressive strength - was studied. The acrylic polymer (AP) admixture performed better than the naphthalene (SNF) or melamine (SMF) based superplasticizers in regard to lower water-cement ratio and higher compressive strength at ages after 3 days. The 1-day compressive strength of the RPM with the AP admixture was much lower than that of the corresponding mixtures with SNF or SMF with C3a-free portland cement with a low specific surface are was used. This was due to a strong retarding effect of the early hydration when this cement was used in combination with some silica fume types. With other portland cements, the retarding in the early hydration caused by AP did not occur and therefore the 1-day compressive strength was quite high. The 28-day compressive strength of RPM specimens, cured at room temperature, were strongly dependent on the type of cement, silica fume and superplasticizer. However, the highest values obtained in this investigation (160-180 Mpa) were lower than those reported by the inventors of RPM (170-230 Mpa).","PeriodicalId":21898,"journal":{"name":"SP-173: Fifth CANMET/ACI International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-173: Fifth CANMET/ACI International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/6201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reactive powder mortar (RPM) mixtures cured at room temperature with different portland cement, silica fume and steel fibers were manufactured. The influence of the superplasticizer type on the ROM performance - in terms of w/c and compressive strength - was studied. The acrylic polymer (AP) admixture performed better than the naphthalene (SNF) or melamine (SMF) based superplasticizers in regard to lower water-cement ratio and higher compressive strength at ages after 3 days. The 1-day compressive strength of the RPM with the AP admixture was much lower than that of the corresponding mixtures with SNF or SMF with C3a-free portland cement with a low specific surface are was used. This was due to a strong retarding effect of the early hydration when this cement was used in combination with some silica fume types. With other portland cements, the retarding in the early hydration caused by AP did not occur and therefore the 1-day compressive strength was quite high. The 28-day compressive strength of RPM specimens, cured at room temperature, were strongly dependent on the type of cement, silica fume and superplasticizer. However, the highest values obtained in this investigation (160-180 Mpa) were lower than those reported by the inventors of RPM (170-230 Mpa).
高效减水剂种类对活性粉砂浆抗压强度的影响
制备了不同硅酸盐水泥、硅灰和钢纤维常温固化的活性粉末砂浆(RPM)混合物。研究了高效减水剂种类对ROM性能的影响,包括w/c和抗压强度。在龄期3 d后,丙烯酸聚合物(AP)比萘(SNF)和三聚氰胺(SMF)具有更低的水灰比和更高的抗压强度。掺入AP的RPM的1天抗压强度远低于SNF或SMF掺入低比表面无c3a硅酸盐水泥的相应混合物。这是由于当这种水泥与某些硅灰类型结合使用时,早期水化的强缓凝作用。与其他硅酸盐水泥相比,未发生AP引起的早期水化迟滞,因此1天抗压强度较高。室温下固化的RPM试件的28天抗压强度与水泥、硅灰和高效减水剂的类型密切相关。然而,本研究获得的最高值(160-180 Mpa)低于RPM发明人报告的值(170-230 Mpa)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信