Future workplace EV charging architectures: DC and AC charging choices

Q3 Engineering
M. Yasko, Attila Bálint, J. Driesen, W. Martínez
{"title":"Future workplace EV charging architectures: DC and AC charging choices","authors":"M. Yasko, Attila Bálint, J. Driesen, W. Martínez","doi":"10.1109/ESARS-ITEC57127.2023.10114837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of differences between the electric vehicle (EV) charging architectures is a crucial point in choosing between AC and DC charging solutions, given the diverse requirements of various use cases (e.g. workplace charging). This research paper presents a model and simulation of EV charging architectures, including the grid, photovoltaic (PV), and battery energy storage system (BESS), for varied charging scenarios to investigate the power conversion efficiency of AC and DC charging at 11 kW and 22 kW power levels. The EV chargers are used in different architectures to simulate charging scenarios using grid, PV, and BESS. The simulation parameters incorporate a typical office consumption profile and multiple charging points for both power levels. The simulation results demonstrate that DC charging is superior in both PV and BESS scenarios, with PV charging being more efficient. The daily losses for different charging architectures were extrapolated to weekly and annual losses to elucidate the long-term benefits of PV DC charging.","PeriodicalId":38493,"journal":{"name":"AUS","volume":"211 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESARS-ITEC57127.2023.10114837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of differences between the electric vehicle (EV) charging architectures is a crucial point in choosing between AC and DC charging solutions, given the diverse requirements of various use cases (e.g. workplace charging). This research paper presents a model and simulation of EV charging architectures, including the grid, photovoltaic (PV), and battery energy storage system (BESS), for varied charging scenarios to investigate the power conversion efficiency of AC and DC charging at 11 kW and 22 kW power levels. The EV chargers are used in different architectures to simulate charging scenarios using grid, PV, and BESS. The simulation parameters incorporate a typical office consumption profile and multiple charging points for both power levels. The simulation results demonstrate that DC charging is superior in both PV and BESS scenarios, with PV charging being more efficient. The daily losses for different charging architectures were extrapolated to weekly and annual losses to elucidate the long-term benefits of PV DC charging.
未来工作场所电动汽车充电架构:直流和交流充电选择
考虑到各种用例(例如工作场所充电)的不同要求,评估电动汽车(EV)充电架构之间的差异是选择交流和直流充电解决方案的关键。本文提出了电动汽车充电架构的模型和仿真,包括电网、光伏(PV)和电池储能系统(BESS),用于不同的充电场景,以研究交流和直流充电在11千瓦和22千瓦功率水平下的功率转换效率。电动汽车充电器用于不同的架构中,以模拟使用电网,PV和BESS的充电场景。仿真参数包含典型的办公室消耗配置文件和两个功率水平的多个充电点。仿真结果表明,直流充电在光伏和BESS两种情况下均优于直流充电,且光伏充电效率更高。不同充电架构的日损失被外推到每周和每年的损失,以阐明光伏直流充电的长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AUS
AUS Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Revista AUS es una publicación académica de corriente principal perteneciente a la comunidad de investigadores de la arquitectura y el urbanismo sostenibles, en el ámbito de las culturas locales y globales. La revista es semestral, cuenta con comité editorial y sus artículos son revisados por pares en el sistema de doble ciego. Periodicidad semestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信