Courtney Armstrong, S. Grant, K. Kinnett, B. Denger, Annalee Martin, I. Coulter, M. Booth, Dmitry Khodyakov
{"title":"Participant experiences with a new online modified-Delphi approach for engaging patients and caregivers in developing clinical guidelines.","authors":"Courtney Armstrong, S. Grant, K. Kinnett, B. Denger, Annalee Martin, I. Coulter, M. Booth, Dmitry Khodyakov","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPatient engagement in clinical practice guideline (CPG) development has increased significantly in recent years. However, only a few patients and caregivers join CPG development groups.\n\n\nObjective\nTo describe participant experiences with a novel online, scalable approach for patient and caregiver engagement in CPG development.\n\n\nDesign\nWe developed and tested the RAND/PPMD Patient-Centeredness Method (RPM), a novel online modified-Delphi approach to patient engagement in CPG development that consists of an optional idea generation round and two rating rounds interspersed with an online discussion round.\n\n\nSetting and Participants\nUsing the online ExpertLens™ system, we ran 2 concurrent panels of patients and caregivers of individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD).\n\n\nMain Outcome Measures\nWe surveyed all 95 panel participants about their participation and satisfaction with the process. We also conducted telephone interviews with 25 participants.\n\n\nResults\nParticipants expressed satisfaction with various ExpertLens™ features, noting that the system fostered lively interaction among them. Panelists also appreciated participating in an educational, interactive and convenient discussion forum that allowed them to share their opinions on the importance and acceptability of different recommendations. The RPM was viewed as empowering by patients and their caregivers who felt it would be useful for CPG developers.\n\n\nDiscussion and Conclusion\nThe results of our study show the overall participant satisfaction with a novel, scalable, online approach to engaging patients and caregivers in CPG development, which allows them to share their perspectives and lived experiences using a rigorous, systematic and iterative way that is similar to how clinicians provide their input.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"189 1","pages":"476-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Background
Patient engagement in clinical practice guideline (CPG) development has increased significantly in recent years. However, only a few patients and caregivers join CPG development groups.
Objective
To describe participant experiences with a novel online, scalable approach for patient and caregiver engagement in CPG development.
Design
We developed and tested the RAND/PPMD Patient-Centeredness Method (RPM), a novel online modified-Delphi approach to patient engagement in CPG development that consists of an optional idea generation round and two rating rounds interspersed with an online discussion round.
Setting and Participants
Using the online ExpertLens™ system, we ran 2 concurrent panels of patients and caregivers of individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD).
Main Outcome Measures
We surveyed all 95 panel participants about their participation and satisfaction with the process. We also conducted telephone interviews with 25 participants.
Results
Participants expressed satisfaction with various ExpertLens™ features, noting that the system fostered lively interaction among them. Panelists also appreciated participating in an educational, interactive and convenient discussion forum that allowed them to share their opinions on the importance and acceptability of different recommendations. The RPM was viewed as empowering by patients and their caregivers who felt it would be useful for CPG developers.
Discussion and Conclusion
The results of our study show the overall participant satisfaction with a novel, scalable, online approach to engaging patients and caregivers in CPG development, which allows them to share their perspectives and lived experiences using a rigorous, systematic and iterative way that is similar to how clinicians provide their input.