Economic Model of Unipolar World Order: Divestment in Central and Eastern European Countries

Mariia Lavrovna Gorbunova, I. Komarov, Tatiana Dmitrievna Komarova
{"title":"Economic Model of Unipolar World Order: Divestment in Central and Eastern European Countries","authors":"Mariia Lavrovna Gorbunova, I. Komarov, Tatiana Dmitrievna Komarova","doi":"10.15458/2335-4216.1324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research relevance: Investment processes are not free from the influence of the political situation and relations between states. The Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) take part in a liberal segment of the global financial system and have a comparatively peripheral position as latecomers to the EU. Due to this fact their economic model is the most consistent with the principles of the liberal world order. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess and interpret the investment/divestment process in Central and Eastern European countries and comparable financial systems in the political economy and geopolitical framework to consider the divestment process as a phenomenon connected to the world-order evolution, industrial and financial globalization. Structure/methodology/approach: We propose to consider the evolution of foreign direct and portfolio investment, together with other macroeconomic indicators that may shed light on the recovery process, as capital outflows have occurred in five CEE countries since 1990 till nowadays. This period covers both the time before and after the 2008 crisis. The study of the research methodology is both qualitative and quantitative. We used existing and target indicators, such as the difference between GNI and GDP, and the surplus/deficit of accumulated capital over savings, to see the broader financial context and the impact of the foreign sector on well-being through a descriptive methodology. While using the regression analysis, we found a greater impact of foreign direct investment on capital accumulation than on savings accumulation, compared to portfolio investment, although both types of investment are positively correlated with “excess” capital accumulation. This approach allows us to make an assessment of the manifestations of","PeriodicalId":30292,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Business Review","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research relevance: Investment processes are not free from the influence of the political situation and relations between states. The Central and Eastern European countries (CEE) take part in a liberal segment of the global financial system and have a comparatively peripheral position as latecomers to the EU. Due to this fact their economic model is the most consistent with the principles of the liberal world order. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess and interpret the investment/divestment process in Central and Eastern European countries and comparable financial systems in the political economy and geopolitical framework to consider the divestment process as a phenomenon connected to the world-order evolution, industrial and financial globalization. Structure/methodology/approach: We propose to consider the evolution of foreign direct and portfolio investment, together with other macroeconomic indicators that may shed light on the recovery process, as capital outflows have occurred in five CEE countries since 1990 till nowadays. This period covers both the time before and after the 2008 crisis. The study of the research methodology is both qualitative and quantitative. We used existing and target indicators, such as the difference between GNI and GDP, and the surplus/deficit of accumulated capital over savings, to see the broader financial context and the impact of the foreign sector on well-being through a descriptive methodology. While using the regression analysis, we found a greater impact of foreign direct investment on capital accumulation than on savings accumulation, compared to portfolio investment, although both types of investment are positively correlated with “excess” capital accumulation. This approach allows us to make an assessment of the manifestations of
单极世界秩序的经济模式:中欧和东欧国家的撤资
研究相关性:投资过程并非不受政治局势和国家间关系的影响。中欧和东欧国家(CEE)参与全球金融体系的自由部分,作为欧盟的后来者,处于相对边缘的地位。由于这一事实,他们的经济模式与自由世界秩序的原则最为一致。目的:本文的目的是在政治经济和地缘政治框架下评估和解释中欧和东欧国家和类似金融体系的投资/撤资过程,将撤资过程视为与世界秩序演变、工业和金融全球化相关的一种现象。结构/方法/方法:我们建议考虑外国直接投资和证券投资的演变,以及其他可能揭示复苏过程的宏观经济指标,因为自1990年至今,五个中东欧国家都发生了资本外流。这一时期涵盖了2008年金融危机前后的时间。研究方法的研究是定性和定量相结合的。我们使用现有和目标指标,如GNI和GDP之间的差异,以及积累资本对储蓄的盈余/赤字,通过描述性方法来了解更广泛的金融背景和外国部门对福祉的影响。在使用回归分析时,我们发现,与证券投资相比,外国直接投资对资本积累的影响大于对储蓄积累的影响,尽管这两种类型的投资都与“过剩”资本积累呈正相关。这种方法使我们能够对……的表现作出评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信