Residents' reflection on tenure in security estates in South Africa

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Neoline le Roux, Alet C. Erasmus
{"title":"Residents' reflection on tenure in security estates in South Africa","authors":"Neoline le Roux, Alet C. Erasmus","doi":"10.4314/JFECS.V39I1.71599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years fear of crime has become an important motivation for South African families to move into security estates rather than residing in free standing homes in open neighbourhoods.  Those who can afford housing in security developments not only provide their families with a sense of security and safety, but also acquire a desirable lifestyle and status. This exploratory study involved 205 residents of both genders, who live in upmarket security estates in Tshwane. They completed a structured questionnaire, which investigated the factors that influenced their decision to move to a security estate as well as their post-purchase evaluation of residence in the estate. Convenient, snowball sampling provided the only workable solution to recruit respondents because it was time consuming and particularly difficult to gain access to these estates. Not surprising safety and security was identified as the most important factor that influenced residents’ housing decision although they admitted that the impressiveness of security estates also was also influential. Respondents unequivocally indicated that they would not want to move to a home other than one in a security estate. This study therefore confirms the positive post-purchase evaluation of homeownership in security estates. Respondents strongly agreed that their current homes provided them with a utopia where concerns about maintenance and management were handled by a competent body corporate. They enjoyed the uniqueness and spaciousness of their tenure; the safety and security aspects which secured their well-being; as well as a sense of neighbourliness. Issues however came to the fore in the projective technique that could be explored further, for example complaints about lack of privacy (in some estates, the yards are small because houses are densely built) and financial implications (levies surfaced as a concern in terms of long term affordability). Positive aspects however outweighed all their concerns.","PeriodicalId":53194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","volume":"76 1","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JFECS.V39I1.71599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years fear of crime has become an important motivation for South African families to move into security estates rather than residing in free standing homes in open neighbourhoods.  Those who can afford housing in security developments not only provide their families with a sense of security and safety, but also acquire a desirable lifestyle and status. This exploratory study involved 205 residents of both genders, who live in upmarket security estates in Tshwane. They completed a structured questionnaire, which investigated the factors that influenced their decision to move to a security estate as well as their post-purchase evaluation of residence in the estate. Convenient, snowball sampling provided the only workable solution to recruit respondents because it was time consuming and particularly difficult to gain access to these estates. Not surprising safety and security was identified as the most important factor that influenced residents’ housing decision although they admitted that the impressiveness of security estates also was also influential. Respondents unequivocally indicated that they would not want to move to a home other than one in a security estate. This study therefore confirms the positive post-purchase evaluation of homeownership in security estates. Respondents strongly agreed that their current homes provided them with a utopia where concerns about maintenance and management were handled by a competent body corporate. They enjoyed the uniqueness and spaciousness of their tenure; the safety and security aspects which secured their well-being; as well as a sense of neighbourliness. Issues however came to the fore in the projective technique that could be explored further, for example complaints about lack of privacy (in some estates, the yards are small because houses are densely built) and financial implications (levies surfaced as a concern in terms of long term affordability). Positive aspects however outweighed all their concerns.
南非居民对安全屋使用权的反思
近年来,对犯罪的恐惧已成为南非家庭搬进安全屋而不是住在开放社区的独立式房屋的重要动机。那些能够负担得起安全小区住房的人,不仅为他们的家庭提供了安全感,而且还获得了理想的生活方式和地位。这项探索性研究涉及205名居住在茨瓦内高档安全住宅区的男女居民。他们完成了一份结构化的问卷,调查了影响他们决定搬到安全屋的因素,以及他们在购买后对该屋的住宅的评估。方便的滚雪球抽样是唯一可行的方法来招募受访者,因为它既耗时又特别难以进入这些屋邨。毫不奇怪,安全和保障被确定为影响居民住房决策的最重要因素,尽管他们承认安全屋的印象也有影响。受访者明确表示,他们不想搬到安全邨以外的房屋。因此,本研究证实了保障屋的购后评价是积极的。受访者强烈同意,他们目前的家为他们提供了一个乌托邦,在那里,有关维护和管理的问题由一个有能力的法人团体处理。他们享受自己任期的独特性和广阔空间;保障他们福祉的安全和保障方面;以及睦邻友好的感觉。然而,投影技术中出现的问题可以进一步探讨,例如对缺乏隐私的抱怨(在一些小区,庭院很小,因为房屋密集)和财务影响(就长期负担能力而言,税收问题浮出水面)。然而,积极的方面超过了他们所有的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences
Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信