The Synergistic Role of Integrated Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Disorders of the Pancreatobiliary System

Santosh Rai, S. Srivastava, S. Gopal, Anika Tiku
{"title":"The Synergistic Role of Integrated Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Disorders of the Pancreatobiliary System","authors":"Santosh Rai, S. Srivastava, S. Gopal, Anika Tiku","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  The aim of the study was to evaluate the synergistic role and advantages of integrating noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in disorders of the pancreatobiliary (PB) system. Methods  In this cross-sectional and retrospective record-based study, radiological (NCCT and MRCP) data were collected retrospectively for a period of 3 years (June 2018–August 2020) from 52 patients. The results were compared to the final diagnosis on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) findings (gold standard). The data collected were analyzed by measuring the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and p -value for NCCT, MRCP, and integrated NCCT plus MRCP at different cutoff points. Subsequently, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze different thresholds for NCCT, MRCP, and integrated NCCT plus MRCP. Results  The most common pathologies identified were biliary dilations (18.4%), common bile duct (CBD) calculi (13.6%), and biliary strictures (12.0%). Overall, MRCP provided a higher percentage of correct diagnoses (81.6%) compared to CT (56.0%). Integrating NCCT with MRCP showed a significant increase in sensitivities and specificities when compared to NCCT or MRCP alone. Integrated NCCT plus MRCP showed excellent performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of ROC analysis of 0.937. Conclusion  Our study showed that integrating NCCT and MRCP can prove to be an excellent tool in establishing a detailed diagnosis of PB disorders, better than either NCCT or MRCP alone. Due to the concurrent nature of PB disorders, it may be worth considering integrating NCCT and MRCP, given that there is an absence of contraindications to either modality.","PeriodicalId":52666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective  The aim of the study was to evaluate the synergistic role and advantages of integrating noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in disorders of the pancreatobiliary (PB) system. Methods  In this cross-sectional and retrospective record-based study, radiological (NCCT and MRCP) data were collected retrospectively for a period of 3 years (June 2018–August 2020) from 52 patients. The results were compared to the final diagnosis on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) findings (gold standard). The data collected were analyzed by measuring the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and p -value for NCCT, MRCP, and integrated NCCT plus MRCP at different cutoff points. Subsequently, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze different thresholds for NCCT, MRCP, and integrated NCCT plus MRCP. Results  The most common pathologies identified were biliary dilations (18.4%), common bile duct (CBD) calculi (13.6%), and biliary strictures (12.0%). Overall, MRCP provided a higher percentage of correct diagnoses (81.6%) compared to CT (56.0%). Integrating NCCT with MRCP showed a significant increase in sensitivities and specificities when compared to NCCT or MRCP alone. Integrated NCCT plus MRCP showed excellent performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of ROC analysis of 0.937. Conclusion  Our study showed that integrating NCCT and MRCP can prove to be an excellent tool in establishing a detailed diagnosis of PB disorders, better than either NCCT or MRCP alone. Due to the concurrent nature of PB disorders, it may be worth considering integrating NCCT and MRCP, given that there is an absence of contraindications to either modality.
综合计算机断层扫描和磁共振胆管造影在胰胆管系统疾病中的协同作用
摘要目的探讨非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)与磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在胰胆管系统疾病诊断中的协同作用及优势。方法在这项基于横截面和回顾性记录的研究中,回顾性收集了52例患者3年(2018年6月至2020年8月)的放射学(NCCT和MRCP)数据。将结果与内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的最终诊断结果(金标准)进行比较。收集的数据通过测量NCCT、MRCP以及NCCT + MRCP在不同截断点的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断准确性和p值进行分析。随后绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析NCCT、MRCP以及NCCT + MRCP综合检测的不同阈值。结果最常见的病理为胆道扩张(18.4%)、胆总管结石(13.6%)和胆道狭窄(12.0%)。总体而言,MRCP提供的正确诊断率(81.6%)高于CT(56.0%)。与单独使用NCCT或MRCP相比,将NCCT与MRCP结合使用的敏感性和特异性显著增加。综合NCCT + MRCP效果良好,ROC分析曲线下面积(AUC)为0.937。结论结合NCCT和MRCP是建立PB疾病详细诊断的一个很好的工具,比单独使用NCCT或MRCP更好。由于PB疾病的并发性,考虑到NCCT和MRCP两种方式都没有禁忌症,可能值得考虑整合NCCT和MRCP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信