Assessment of the Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients In Kazakhstan (on the Example of Balkhash)

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Saltanat Makhanova, Raushan Sekenova
{"title":"Assessment of the Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients In Kazakhstan (on the Example of Balkhash)","authors":"Saltanat Makhanova, Raushan Sekenova","doi":"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study: analysis and assessment of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in Kazakhstan on the example of Balkhash. Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the municipal state institution (KSU) \"Polyclinic No. 2\" of the city of Balkhash, Karaganda region in the period from 2019 to 2020. The study involved 46 men and 74 women. The average age of the respondents was ≥64 years. To determine the quality of life of glaucoma patients, we conducted a questionnaire compiled by ourselves and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. The respondents were conditionally divided into three groups: group 1-patients who receive only conservative treatment; group 2 – patients who underwent laser correction in parallel with conservative treatment; group 3-patients who, in addition to previous types of treatment, were operated on. Results. Among the comparison groups, the values of indicators of dependence on the help of others (23.7) and role difficulties (23.9) and social activity (81.6) were significantly lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment. In this group, along with the physical and mental components, it was found that the gap in visual indicators is up to 4 times. Conclusions. The results of the study show that in glaucoma patients receiving only conservative treatment, the quality of life is low compared to the control groups according to all indicators of the scales. A significant impact on the decrease in the quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment is caused by the discomfort associated with regular use of drugs prescribed for glaucoma and their side effects. Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, NEI VFQ-256 questionnaire, Kazakhstan.","PeriodicalId":11852,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-2-42-52-62","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study: analysis and assessment of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in Kazakhstan on the example of Balkhash. Methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the municipal state institution (KSU) "Polyclinic No. 2" of the city of Balkhash, Karaganda region in the period from 2019 to 2020. The study involved 46 men and 74 women. The average age of the respondents was ≥64 years. To determine the quality of life of glaucoma patients, we conducted a questionnaire compiled by ourselves and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. The respondents were conditionally divided into three groups: group 1-patients who receive only conservative treatment; group 2 – patients who underwent laser correction in parallel with conservative treatment; group 3-patients who, in addition to previous types of treatment, were operated on. Results. Among the comparison groups, the values of indicators of dependence on the help of others (23.7) and role difficulties (23.9) and social activity (81.6) were significantly lower in patients receiving only conservative treatment. In this group, along with the physical and mental components, it was found that the gap in visual indicators is up to 4 times. Conclusions. The results of the study show that in glaucoma patients receiving only conservative treatment, the quality of life is low compared to the control groups according to all indicators of the scales. A significant impact on the decrease in the quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment is caused by the discomfort associated with regular use of drugs prescribed for glaucoma and their side effects. Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, NEI VFQ-256 questionnaire, Kazakhstan.
哈萨克斯坦青光眼患者生活质量评价(以巴尔喀什为例)
本研究目的:以巴尔喀什为例,对哈萨克斯坦青光眼患者的生活质量进行分析和评价。方法。这项研究是在市政国家机构(KSU)的基础上进行的。2019年至2020年期间卡拉干达地区巴尔喀什市“第二综合诊所”。这项研究涉及46名男性和74名女性。受访者平均年龄≥64岁。为了确定青光眼患者的生活质量,我们进行了自己编写的问卷和NEI VFQ-25问卷。受访者被有条件地分为三组:第一组仅接受保守治疗的患者;第二组:在保守治疗的同时进行激光矫正的患者;第三组患者在原有治疗方法的基础上进行手术治疗。结果。在对照组中,仅接受保守治疗的患者对他人帮助的依赖性(23.7)、角色困难(23.9)和社会活动(81.6)指标值均显著低于对照组。在这一组中,加上身体和精神成分,发现视觉指标的差距高达4倍。结论。研究结果显示,仅接受保守治疗的青光眼患者的生活质量在各量表指标上均低于对照组。对接受保守治疗的患者生活质量下降的一个重要影响是由于经常使用青光眼处方药物及其副作用引起的不适。关键词:青光眼,生活质量,NEI VFQ-256问卷,哈萨克斯坦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development is a multi and interdisciplinary platform that provides space for public health experts in academics, policy and programs to share empirical evidence to contribute to health development agenda. We publish original research articles, reviews, brief communications and commentaries on public health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to the scholars in the field of public health, social sciences and humanities, health practitioners and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of public health from a wide range of fields: epidemiology, environmental health, health economics, reproductive health, behavioral sciences, nutrition, psychiatry, social pharmacy, medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychology and wide arrays of social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes the following types of contribution: 1) Peer-reviewed original research articles and critical or analytical reviews in any area of social public health. These papers may be up to 3,500 words excluding abstract, tables, and references. Papers below this limit are preferred. 2) Peer-reviewed short reports of research findings on topical issues or published articles of between 2000 and 4000 words. 3) Brief communications, and commentaries debating on particular areas of focus, and published alongside, selected articles. 4) Special Issues bringing together collections of papers on a particular theme, and usually guest edited. 5) Editorial that flags critical issues of public health debate for policy, program and scientific consumption or further debate
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信