Accelerating Similarity Search for Elastic Measures: A Study and New Generalization of Lower Bounding Distances

John Paparrizos, Kaize Wu, Aaron J. Elmore, C. Faloutsos, M. Franklin
{"title":"Accelerating Similarity Search for Elastic Measures: A Study and New Generalization of Lower Bounding Distances","authors":"John Paparrizos, Kaize Wu, Aaron J. Elmore, C. Faloutsos, M. Franklin","doi":"10.14778/3594512.3594530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Similarity search is a core analytical task, and its performance critically depends on the choice of distance measure. For time-series querying, elastic measures achieve state-of-the-art accuracy but are computationally expensive. Thus, fast lower bounding (LB) measures prune unnecessary comparisons with elastic distances to accelerate similarity search. Despite decades of attention, there has never been a study to assess the progress in this area. In addition, the research has disproportionately focused on one popular elastic measure, while other accurate measures have received little or no attention. Therefore, there is merit in developing a framework to accumulate knowledge from previously developed LBs and eliminate the notoriously challenging task of designing separate LBs for each elastic measure. In this paper, we perform the first comprehensive study of 11 LBs spanning 5 elastic measures using 128 datasets. We identify four properties that constitute the effectiveness of LBs and propose the Generalized Lower Bounding (GLB) framework to satisfy all desirable properties. GLB creates cache-friendly summaries, adaptively exploits summaries of both query and target time series, and captures boundary distances in an unsupervised manner. GLB outperforms\n all\n LBs in speedup (e.g., up to 13.5× faster against the strongest LB in terms of pruning power), establishes new state-of-the-art results for the 5 elastic measures, and provides the first LBs for 2 elastic measures with no known LBs. Overall, GLB enables the effective development of LBs to facilitate fast similarity search.\n","PeriodicalId":20467,"journal":{"name":"Proc. VLDB Endow.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. VLDB Endow.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14778/3594512.3594530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Similarity search is a core analytical task, and its performance critically depends on the choice of distance measure. For time-series querying, elastic measures achieve state-of-the-art accuracy but are computationally expensive. Thus, fast lower bounding (LB) measures prune unnecessary comparisons with elastic distances to accelerate similarity search. Despite decades of attention, there has never been a study to assess the progress in this area. In addition, the research has disproportionately focused on one popular elastic measure, while other accurate measures have received little or no attention. Therefore, there is merit in developing a framework to accumulate knowledge from previously developed LBs and eliminate the notoriously challenging task of designing separate LBs for each elastic measure. In this paper, we perform the first comprehensive study of 11 LBs spanning 5 elastic measures using 128 datasets. We identify four properties that constitute the effectiveness of LBs and propose the Generalized Lower Bounding (GLB) framework to satisfy all desirable properties. GLB creates cache-friendly summaries, adaptively exploits summaries of both query and target time series, and captures boundary distances in an unsupervised manner. GLB outperforms all LBs in speedup (e.g., up to 13.5× faster against the strongest LB in terms of pruning power), establishes new state-of-the-art results for the 5 elastic measures, and provides the first LBs for 2 elastic measures with no known LBs. Overall, GLB enables the effective development of LBs to facilitate fast similarity search.
加速弹性测度的相似搜索:下边界距离的研究与新推广
相似度搜索是一项核心的分析任务,它的性能在很大程度上取决于距离度量的选择。对于时间序列查询,弹性度量可以达到最先进的精度,但计算成本很高。因此,快速下限边界(LB)度量减少了不必要的与弹性距离的比较,从而加快了相似性搜索。尽管人们关注了几十年,但从来没有一项研究对这一领域的进展进行评估。此外,研究不成比例地集中在一种流行的弹性测量上,而其他准确的测量方法很少或根本没有得到关注。因此,有必要开发一个框架来积累以前开发的lb的知识,并消除为每个弹性度量设计单独lb的众所周知的挑战性任务。在本文中,我们使用128个数据集对11 LBs跨越5个弹性测量进行了首次全面研究。我们确定了构成lb有效性的四个性质,并提出了广义下边界(GLB)框架来满足所有理想的性质。GLB创建缓存友好的摘要,自适应地利用查询和目标时间序列的摘要,并以无监督的方式捕获边界距离。GLB在加速方面优于所有LB(例如,在修剪功率方面比最强LB快13.5倍),为5个弹性测量建立了新的最先进的结果,并为2个未知LB的弹性测量提供了第一个LB。总体而言,GLB使LBs得以有效开发,便于快速进行相似度搜索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信